Cargando…

Quantification of left ventricular mass by echocardiography compared to cardiac magnet resonance imaging in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), defined by the left ventricular mass index (LVMI), is highly prevalent in hemodialysis patients and a strong independent predictor of cardiovascular events. Compared to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), echocardiography tends to overestimate th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grebe, Sören Jendrik, Malzahn, Uwe, Donhauser, Julian, Liu, Dan, Wanner, Christoph, Krane, Vera, Hammer, Fabian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7495823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32938484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12947-020-00217-y
_version_ 1783582967575085056
author Grebe, Sören Jendrik
Malzahn, Uwe
Donhauser, Julian
Liu, Dan
Wanner, Christoph
Krane, Vera
Hammer, Fabian
author_facet Grebe, Sören Jendrik
Malzahn, Uwe
Donhauser, Julian
Liu, Dan
Wanner, Christoph
Krane, Vera
Hammer, Fabian
author_sort Grebe, Sören Jendrik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), defined by the left ventricular mass index (LVMI), is highly prevalent in hemodialysis patients and a strong independent predictor of cardiovascular events. Compared to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), echocardiography tends to overestimate the LVMI. Here, we evaluate the diagnostic performance of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) compared to CMR regarding the assessment of LVMI in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: TTR and CMR data for 95 hemodialysis patients who participated in the MiREnDa trial were analyzed. The LVMI was calculated by two-dimensional (2D) TTE-guided M-mode measurements employing the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and Teichholz (Th) formulas, which were compared to the reference method, CMR. RESULTS: LVH was present in 44% of patients based on LVMI measured by CMR. LVMI measured by echocardiography correlated moderately with CMR, ASE: r = 0.44 (0.34–0.62); Th: r = 0.44 (0.32–0.62). Compared to CMR, both echocardiographic formulas overestimated LVMI (mean ∆LVMI (ASE-CMR): 19.5 ± 19.48 g/m(2), p < 0.001; mean ∆LVMI (Th-CMR): 15.9 ± 15.89 g/m(2), p < 0.001). We found greater LVMI overestimation in patients with LVH using the ASE formula compared to the Th formula. Stratification of patients into CMR LVMI quartiles showed a continuous decrease in ∆LVMI with increasing CMR LVMI quartiles for the Th formula (p < 0.001) but not for the ASE formula (p = 0.772). Bland-Altman analysis showed that the Th formula had a constant bias independent of LVMI. Both methods had good discrimination ability for the detection of LVH (ROC-AUC: 0.819 (0.737–0.901) and 0.808 (0.723–0.892) for Th and ASE, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The ASE and Th formulas overestimate LVMI in hemodialysis patients. However, the overestimation is less with the Th formula, particularly with increasing LVMI. The results suggest that the Th formula should be preferred for measurement of LVMI in chronic hemodialysis patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The data was derived from the following clinical trial: NCT01691053, registered on 19 September 2012 before enrollment of the first participant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7495823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74958232020-09-23 Quantification of left ventricular mass by echocardiography compared to cardiac magnet resonance imaging in hemodialysis patients Grebe, Sören Jendrik Malzahn, Uwe Donhauser, Julian Liu, Dan Wanner, Christoph Krane, Vera Hammer, Fabian Cardiovasc Ultrasound Research BACKGROUND: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), defined by the left ventricular mass index (LVMI), is highly prevalent in hemodialysis patients and a strong independent predictor of cardiovascular events. Compared to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), echocardiography tends to overestimate the LVMI. Here, we evaluate the diagnostic performance of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) compared to CMR regarding the assessment of LVMI in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: TTR and CMR data for 95 hemodialysis patients who participated in the MiREnDa trial were analyzed. The LVMI was calculated by two-dimensional (2D) TTE-guided M-mode measurements employing the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and Teichholz (Th) formulas, which were compared to the reference method, CMR. RESULTS: LVH was present in 44% of patients based on LVMI measured by CMR. LVMI measured by echocardiography correlated moderately with CMR, ASE: r = 0.44 (0.34–0.62); Th: r = 0.44 (0.32–0.62). Compared to CMR, both echocardiographic formulas overestimated LVMI (mean ∆LVMI (ASE-CMR): 19.5 ± 19.48 g/m(2), p < 0.001; mean ∆LVMI (Th-CMR): 15.9 ± 15.89 g/m(2), p < 0.001). We found greater LVMI overestimation in patients with LVH using the ASE formula compared to the Th formula. Stratification of patients into CMR LVMI quartiles showed a continuous decrease in ∆LVMI with increasing CMR LVMI quartiles for the Th formula (p < 0.001) but not for the ASE formula (p = 0.772). Bland-Altman analysis showed that the Th formula had a constant bias independent of LVMI. Both methods had good discrimination ability for the detection of LVH (ROC-AUC: 0.819 (0.737–0.901) and 0.808 (0.723–0.892) for Th and ASE, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The ASE and Th formulas overestimate LVMI in hemodialysis patients. However, the overestimation is less with the Th formula, particularly with increasing LVMI. The results suggest that the Th formula should be preferred for measurement of LVMI in chronic hemodialysis patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The data was derived from the following clinical trial: NCT01691053, registered on 19 September 2012 before enrollment of the first participant. BioMed Central 2020-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7495823/ /pubmed/32938484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12947-020-00217-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Grebe, Sören Jendrik
Malzahn, Uwe
Donhauser, Julian
Liu, Dan
Wanner, Christoph
Krane, Vera
Hammer, Fabian
Quantification of left ventricular mass by echocardiography compared to cardiac magnet resonance imaging in hemodialysis patients
title Quantification of left ventricular mass by echocardiography compared to cardiac magnet resonance imaging in hemodialysis patients
title_full Quantification of left ventricular mass by echocardiography compared to cardiac magnet resonance imaging in hemodialysis patients
title_fullStr Quantification of left ventricular mass by echocardiography compared to cardiac magnet resonance imaging in hemodialysis patients
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of left ventricular mass by echocardiography compared to cardiac magnet resonance imaging in hemodialysis patients
title_short Quantification of left ventricular mass by echocardiography compared to cardiac magnet resonance imaging in hemodialysis patients
title_sort quantification of left ventricular mass by echocardiography compared to cardiac magnet resonance imaging in hemodialysis patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7495823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32938484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12947-020-00217-y
work_keys_str_mv AT grebesorenjendrik quantificationofleftventricularmassbyechocardiographycomparedtocardiacmagnetresonanceimaginginhemodialysispatients
AT malzahnuwe quantificationofleftventricularmassbyechocardiographycomparedtocardiacmagnetresonanceimaginginhemodialysispatients
AT donhauserjulian quantificationofleftventricularmassbyechocardiographycomparedtocardiacmagnetresonanceimaginginhemodialysispatients
AT liudan quantificationofleftventricularmassbyechocardiographycomparedtocardiacmagnetresonanceimaginginhemodialysispatients
AT wannerchristoph quantificationofleftventricularmassbyechocardiographycomparedtocardiacmagnetresonanceimaginginhemodialysispatients
AT kranevera quantificationofleftventricularmassbyechocardiographycomparedtocardiacmagnetresonanceimaginginhemodialysispatients
AT hammerfabian quantificationofleftventricularmassbyechocardiographycomparedtocardiacmagnetresonanceimaginginhemodialysispatients