Cargando…

Paradoxical response of intracranial pressure to shunt valve setting adjustments

BACKGROUND: The hydrodynamics of cerebrospinal fluid shunts have been described in vitro; however, knowledge on the response of intracranial pressure (ICP) to valve settings adjustments in vivo is limited. This study describes the effect of adjusting the shunt valve setting on ICP in a cohort of pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D’Antona, Linda, Craven, Claudia Louise, Merchan, Melida Andrea Jaime, Thompson, Simon David, Bremner, Fion, Thorne, Lewis, Matharu, Manjit Singh, Watkins, Laurence Dale, Toma, Ahmed Kassem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32583083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04462-y
_version_ 1783583011463233536
author D’Antona, Linda
Craven, Claudia Louise
Merchan, Melida Andrea Jaime
Thompson, Simon David
Bremner, Fion
Thorne, Lewis
Matharu, Manjit Singh
Watkins, Laurence Dale
Toma, Ahmed Kassem
author_facet D’Antona, Linda
Craven, Claudia Louise
Merchan, Melida Andrea Jaime
Thompson, Simon David
Bremner, Fion
Thorne, Lewis
Matharu, Manjit Singh
Watkins, Laurence Dale
Toma, Ahmed Kassem
author_sort D’Antona, Linda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The hydrodynamics of cerebrospinal fluid shunts have been described in vitro; however, knowledge on the response of intracranial pressure (ICP) to valve settings adjustments in vivo is limited. This study describes the effect of adjusting the shunt valve setting on ICP in a cohort of patients with complex symptom management. METHOD: Single-centre retrospective observational study. Patients who underwent ICP-guided valve setting adjustments during 24-h continuous ICP monitoring, between 2014 and 2019, were included. Patients with suspected shunt malfunction were excluded. Median night ICP before and after the valve adjustments were compared (Δ night ICP). The responses of ICP to valve adjustment were divided into 3 different groups as follows: expected, paradoxical and no response. The frequency of the paradoxical response and its potential predicting factors were investigated. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (37 females, 14 males, mean age 38 years) receiving 94 valve setting adjustments met the study inclusion criteria. Patients’ underlying conditions were most commonly hydrocephalus (47%) or idiopathic intracranial hypertension (43%). The response of ICP to valve setting adjustments was classified as ‘expected’ in 54 cases (57%), ‘paradoxical’ in 17 cases (18%) and ‘no effect’ (Δ night ICP < 1 mmHg) in 23 cases (24%). There was a significant correlation between the Δ night ICP and the magnitude of valve setting change in both the investigated valves (Miethke ProGAV, p = 0.01 and Medtronic Strata, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Paradoxical ICP changes can occur after shunt valve setting adjustments. This observation should be taken into account when performing ICP-guided valve adjustments and is highly relevant for the future development of “smart” shunt systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7496047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74960472020-09-29 Paradoxical response of intracranial pressure to shunt valve setting adjustments D’Antona, Linda Craven, Claudia Louise Merchan, Melida Andrea Jaime Thompson, Simon David Bremner, Fion Thorne, Lewis Matharu, Manjit Singh Watkins, Laurence Dale Toma, Ahmed Kassem Acta Neurochir (Wien) Original Article - CSF Circulation BACKGROUND: The hydrodynamics of cerebrospinal fluid shunts have been described in vitro; however, knowledge on the response of intracranial pressure (ICP) to valve settings adjustments in vivo is limited. This study describes the effect of adjusting the shunt valve setting on ICP in a cohort of patients with complex symptom management. METHOD: Single-centre retrospective observational study. Patients who underwent ICP-guided valve setting adjustments during 24-h continuous ICP monitoring, between 2014 and 2019, were included. Patients with suspected shunt malfunction were excluded. Median night ICP before and after the valve adjustments were compared (Δ night ICP). The responses of ICP to valve adjustment were divided into 3 different groups as follows: expected, paradoxical and no response. The frequency of the paradoxical response and its potential predicting factors were investigated. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (37 females, 14 males, mean age 38 years) receiving 94 valve setting adjustments met the study inclusion criteria. Patients’ underlying conditions were most commonly hydrocephalus (47%) or idiopathic intracranial hypertension (43%). The response of ICP to valve setting adjustments was classified as ‘expected’ in 54 cases (57%), ‘paradoxical’ in 17 cases (18%) and ‘no effect’ (Δ night ICP < 1 mmHg) in 23 cases (24%). There was a significant correlation between the Δ night ICP and the magnitude of valve setting change in both the investigated valves (Miethke ProGAV, p = 0.01 and Medtronic Strata, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Paradoxical ICP changes can occur after shunt valve setting adjustments. This observation should be taken into account when performing ICP-guided valve adjustments and is highly relevant for the future development of “smart” shunt systems. Springer Vienna 2020-06-24 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7496047/ /pubmed/32583083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04462-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article - CSF Circulation
D’Antona, Linda
Craven, Claudia Louise
Merchan, Melida Andrea Jaime
Thompson, Simon David
Bremner, Fion
Thorne, Lewis
Matharu, Manjit Singh
Watkins, Laurence Dale
Toma, Ahmed Kassem
Paradoxical response of intracranial pressure to shunt valve setting adjustments
title Paradoxical response of intracranial pressure to shunt valve setting adjustments
title_full Paradoxical response of intracranial pressure to shunt valve setting adjustments
title_fullStr Paradoxical response of intracranial pressure to shunt valve setting adjustments
title_full_unstemmed Paradoxical response of intracranial pressure to shunt valve setting adjustments
title_short Paradoxical response of intracranial pressure to shunt valve setting adjustments
title_sort paradoxical response of intracranial pressure to shunt valve setting adjustments
topic Original Article - CSF Circulation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32583083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04462-y
work_keys_str_mv AT dantonalinda paradoxicalresponseofintracranialpressuretoshuntvalvesettingadjustments
AT cravenclaudialouise paradoxicalresponseofintracranialpressuretoshuntvalvesettingadjustments
AT merchanmelidaandreajaime paradoxicalresponseofintracranialpressuretoshuntvalvesettingadjustments
AT thompsonsimondavid paradoxicalresponseofintracranialpressuretoshuntvalvesettingadjustments
AT bremnerfion paradoxicalresponseofintracranialpressuretoshuntvalvesettingadjustments
AT thornelewis paradoxicalresponseofintracranialpressuretoshuntvalvesettingadjustments
AT matharumanjitsingh paradoxicalresponseofintracranialpressuretoshuntvalvesettingadjustments
AT watkinslaurencedale paradoxicalresponseofintracranialpressuretoshuntvalvesettingadjustments
AT tomaahmedkassem paradoxicalresponseofintracranialpressuretoshuntvalvesettingadjustments