Cargando…

Daily received support and relational functioning in HCT survivors and their caregivers

OBJECTIVES: Numerous authors have expressed their interest in adjustment and social support in the context of cancer. However, none of the previous studies has directly examined the models describing the links between daily social support and adjustment fluctuation, particularly at the relational le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kroemeke, Aleksandra, Sobczyk‐Kruszelnicka, Małgorzata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32539169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.5440
_version_ 1783583031789879296
author Kroemeke, Aleksandra
Sobczyk‐Kruszelnicka, Małgorzata
author_facet Kroemeke, Aleksandra
Sobczyk‐Kruszelnicka, Małgorzata
author_sort Kroemeke, Aleksandra
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Numerous authors have expressed their interest in adjustment and social support in the context of cancer. However, none of the previous studies has directly examined the models describing the links between daily social support and adjustment fluctuation, particularly at the relational level. This study aimed to verify the additive and buffering models of daily received support regarding the relational level of patient‐caregiver relationship, that is, the relationship‐related stress and relationship satisfaction following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). METHODS: Two hundred patient‐caregiver dyads participated in a 28‐day diary study that was started on the first day after post‐HCT discharge. The participants rated the extent of daily relationship‐related stress, relationship satisfaction, and received support every evening during the study. The analyses were based on the actor‐partner interdependence moderation model. RESULTS: Daily deviations in received support were directly associated with concurrent and lagged daily deviations in relationship satisfaction, regardless of relationship‐related stress level in both patients and caregivers. In addition, in caregivers, the effect of daily deviations in received support on relationship satisfaction depended on deviations in relationship‐related stress and was significant on the days with higher relationship‐related stress. CONCLUSIONS: The findings supported both the additive (in patients and caregivers) and the buffering hypotheses (in caregivers) of daily received support in patient‐caregiver dyads during the first month following HCT. The theoretical and practical implications of the findings are further highlighted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7496138
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74961382020-09-25 Daily received support and relational functioning in HCT survivors and their caregivers Kroemeke, Aleksandra Sobczyk‐Kruszelnicka, Małgorzata Psychooncology Papers OBJECTIVES: Numerous authors have expressed their interest in adjustment and social support in the context of cancer. However, none of the previous studies has directly examined the models describing the links between daily social support and adjustment fluctuation, particularly at the relational level. This study aimed to verify the additive and buffering models of daily received support regarding the relational level of patient‐caregiver relationship, that is, the relationship‐related stress and relationship satisfaction following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). METHODS: Two hundred patient‐caregiver dyads participated in a 28‐day diary study that was started on the first day after post‐HCT discharge. The participants rated the extent of daily relationship‐related stress, relationship satisfaction, and received support every evening during the study. The analyses were based on the actor‐partner interdependence moderation model. RESULTS: Daily deviations in received support were directly associated with concurrent and lagged daily deviations in relationship satisfaction, regardless of relationship‐related stress level in both patients and caregivers. In addition, in caregivers, the effect of daily deviations in received support on relationship satisfaction depended on deviations in relationship‐related stress and was significant on the days with higher relationship‐related stress. CONCLUSIONS: The findings supported both the additive (in patients and caregivers) and the buffering hypotheses (in caregivers) of daily received support in patient‐caregiver dyads during the first month following HCT. The theoretical and practical implications of the findings are further highlighted. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2020-07-02 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7496138/ /pubmed/32539169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.5440 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Psycho‐Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Papers
Kroemeke, Aleksandra
Sobczyk‐Kruszelnicka, Małgorzata
Daily received support and relational functioning in HCT survivors and their caregivers
title Daily received support and relational functioning in HCT survivors and their caregivers
title_full Daily received support and relational functioning in HCT survivors and their caregivers
title_fullStr Daily received support and relational functioning in HCT survivors and their caregivers
title_full_unstemmed Daily received support and relational functioning in HCT survivors and their caregivers
title_short Daily received support and relational functioning in HCT survivors and their caregivers
title_sort daily received support and relational functioning in hct survivors and their caregivers
topic Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32539169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.5440
work_keys_str_mv AT kroemekealeksandra dailyreceivedsupportandrelationalfunctioninginhctsurvivorsandtheircaregivers
AT sobczykkruszelnickamałgorzata dailyreceivedsupportandrelationalfunctioninginhctsurvivorsandtheircaregivers