Cargando…

Introduction of the snake antenna array: Geometry optimization of a sinusoidal dipole antenna for 10.5T body imaging with lower peak SAR

PURPOSE: To improve imaging performance for body MRI with a local transmit array at 10.5T, the geometry of a dipole antenna was optimized to achieve lower peak specific absorption rate (SAR) levels and a more uniform transmit profile. METHODS: Electromagnetic simulations on a phantom were used to ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steensma, Bart, van de Moortele, Pierre‐Francois, Ertürk, Arcan, Grant, Andrea, Adriany, Gregor, Luijten, Peter, Klomp, Dennis, van den Berg, Nico, Metzger, Gregory, Raaijmakers, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32367560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28297
_version_ 1783583039996035072
author Steensma, Bart
van de Moortele, Pierre‐Francois
Ertürk, Arcan
Grant, Andrea
Adriany, Gregor
Luijten, Peter
Klomp, Dennis
van den Berg, Nico
Metzger, Gregory
Raaijmakers, Alexander
author_facet Steensma, Bart
van de Moortele, Pierre‐Francois
Ertürk, Arcan
Grant, Andrea
Adriany, Gregor
Luijten, Peter
Klomp, Dennis
van den Berg, Nico
Metzger, Gregory
Raaijmakers, Alexander
author_sort Steensma, Bart
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To improve imaging performance for body MRI with a local transmit array at 10.5T, the geometry of a dipole antenna was optimized to achieve lower peak specific absorption rate (SAR) levels and a more uniform transmit profile. METHODS: Electromagnetic simulations on a phantom were used to evaluate the SAR and [Formula: see text] ‐performance of different dipole antenna geometries. The best performing antenna (the snake antenna) was simulated on human models in a 12‐channel array configuration for safety assessment and for comparison to a previous antenna design. This 12‐channel array was constructed after which electromagnetic simulations were validated by [Formula: see text] ‐maps and temperature measurements. After obtaining approval by the Food and Drug Administration to scan with the snake antenna array, in vivo imaging was performed on 2 volunteers. RESULTS: Simulation results on a phantom indicate a lower SAR and a higher transmit efficiency for the snake antenna compared to the fractionated dipole array. Similar results are found on a human body model: when comparing the trade‐off between uniformity and peak SAR, the snake antenna performs better for all imaging targets. Simulations and measurements are in good agreement. Preliminary imaging result were acquired in 2 volunteers with the 12‐channel snake antenna array. CONCLUSION: By optimizing the geometry of a dipole antenna, peak SAR levels were lowered while achieving a more uniform transmit field as demonstrated in simulations on a phantom and a human body model. The array was constructed, validated, and successfully used to image 2 individuals at 10.5T.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7496175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74961752020-09-25 Introduction of the snake antenna array: Geometry optimization of a sinusoidal dipole antenna for 10.5T body imaging with lower peak SAR Steensma, Bart van de Moortele, Pierre‐Francois Ertürk, Arcan Grant, Andrea Adriany, Gregor Luijten, Peter Klomp, Dennis van den Berg, Nico Metzger, Gregory Raaijmakers, Alexander Magn Reson Med Full Papers—Hardware and Instrumentation PURPOSE: To improve imaging performance for body MRI with a local transmit array at 10.5T, the geometry of a dipole antenna was optimized to achieve lower peak specific absorption rate (SAR) levels and a more uniform transmit profile. METHODS: Electromagnetic simulations on a phantom were used to evaluate the SAR and [Formula: see text] ‐performance of different dipole antenna geometries. The best performing antenna (the snake antenna) was simulated on human models in a 12‐channel array configuration for safety assessment and for comparison to a previous antenna design. This 12‐channel array was constructed after which electromagnetic simulations were validated by [Formula: see text] ‐maps and temperature measurements. After obtaining approval by the Food and Drug Administration to scan with the snake antenna array, in vivo imaging was performed on 2 volunteers. RESULTS: Simulation results on a phantom indicate a lower SAR and a higher transmit efficiency for the snake antenna compared to the fractionated dipole array. Similar results are found on a human body model: when comparing the trade‐off between uniformity and peak SAR, the snake antenna performs better for all imaging targets. Simulations and measurements are in good agreement. Preliminary imaging result were acquired in 2 volunteers with the 12‐channel snake antenna array. CONCLUSION: By optimizing the geometry of a dipole antenna, peak SAR levels were lowered while achieving a more uniform transmit field as demonstrated in simulations on a phantom and a human body model. The array was constructed, validated, and successfully used to image 2 individuals at 10.5T. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-05 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7496175/ /pubmed/32367560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28297 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Papers—Hardware and Instrumentation
Steensma, Bart
van de Moortele, Pierre‐Francois
Ertürk, Arcan
Grant, Andrea
Adriany, Gregor
Luijten, Peter
Klomp, Dennis
van den Berg, Nico
Metzger, Gregory
Raaijmakers, Alexander
Introduction of the snake antenna array: Geometry optimization of a sinusoidal dipole antenna for 10.5T body imaging with lower peak SAR
title Introduction of the snake antenna array: Geometry optimization of a sinusoidal dipole antenna for 10.5T body imaging with lower peak SAR
title_full Introduction of the snake antenna array: Geometry optimization of a sinusoidal dipole antenna for 10.5T body imaging with lower peak SAR
title_fullStr Introduction of the snake antenna array: Geometry optimization of a sinusoidal dipole antenna for 10.5T body imaging with lower peak SAR
title_full_unstemmed Introduction of the snake antenna array: Geometry optimization of a sinusoidal dipole antenna for 10.5T body imaging with lower peak SAR
title_short Introduction of the snake antenna array: Geometry optimization of a sinusoidal dipole antenna for 10.5T body imaging with lower peak SAR
title_sort introduction of the snake antenna array: geometry optimization of a sinusoidal dipole antenna for 10.5t body imaging with lower peak sar
topic Full Papers—Hardware and Instrumentation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32367560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28297
work_keys_str_mv AT steensmabart introductionofthesnakeantennaarraygeometryoptimizationofasinusoidaldipoleantennafor105tbodyimagingwithlowerpeaksar
AT vandemoortelepierrefrancois introductionofthesnakeantennaarraygeometryoptimizationofasinusoidaldipoleantennafor105tbodyimagingwithlowerpeaksar
AT erturkarcan introductionofthesnakeantennaarraygeometryoptimizationofasinusoidaldipoleantennafor105tbodyimagingwithlowerpeaksar
AT grantandrea introductionofthesnakeantennaarraygeometryoptimizationofasinusoidaldipoleantennafor105tbodyimagingwithlowerpeaksar
AT adrianygregor introductionofthesnakeantennaarraygeometryoptimizationofasinusoidaldipoleantennafor105tbodyimagingwithlowerpeaksar
AT luijtenpeter introductionofthesnakeantennaarraygeometryoptimizationofasinusoidaldipoleantennafor105tbodyimagingwithlowerpeaksar
AT klompdennis introductionofthesnakeantennaarraygeometryoptimizationofasinusoidaldipoleantennafor105tbodyimagingwithlowerpeaksar
AT vandenbergnico introductionofthesnakeantennaarraygeometryoptimizationofasinusoidaldipoleantennafor105tbodyimagingwithlowerpeaksar
AT metzgergregory introductionofthesnakeantennaarraygeometryoptimizationofasinusoidaldipoleantennafor105tbodyimagingwithlowerpeaksar
AT raaijmakersalexander introductionofthesnakeantennaarraygeometryoptimizationofasinusoidaldipoleantennafor105tbodyimagingwithlowerpeaksar