Cargando…
Community health workers impact on maternal and child health outcomes in rural South Africa – a non-randomized two-group comparison study
BACKGROUND: Home visits by paraprofessional community health workers (CHWs) has been shown to improve maternal and child health outcomes in research studies in many countries. Yet, when these are scaled or replicated, efficacy disappears. An effective CHW home visiting program in peri-urban Cape Tow...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32943043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09468-w |
_version_ | 1783583049146957824 |
---|---|
author | le Roux, Karl W. Almirol, Ellen Rezvan, Panteha Hayati le Roux, Ingrid M. Mbewu, Nokwanele Dippenaar, Elaine Stansert-Katzen, Linnea Baker, Venetia Tomlinson, Mark Rotheram-Borus, M. J. |
author_facet | le Roux, Karl W. Almirol, Ellen Rezvan, Panteha Hayati le Roux, Ingrid M. Mbewu, Nokwanele Dippenaar, Elaine Stansert-Katzen, Linnea Baker, Venetia Tomlinson, Mark Rotheram-Borus, M. J. |
author_sort | le Roux, Karl W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Home visits by paraprofessional community health workers (CHWs) has been shown to improve maternal and child health outcomes in research studies in many countries. Yet, when these are scaled or replicated, efficacy disappears. An effective CHW home visiting program in peri-urban Cape Town found maternal and child health benefits over the 5 years point but this study examines if these benefits occur in deeply rural communities. METHODS: A non-randomized, two-group comparison study evaluated the impact of CHW in the rural Eastern Cape from August 2014 to May 2017, with 1310 mother-infant pairs recruited in pregnancy and 89% were reassessed at 6 months post-birth. RESULTS: Home visiting had limited, but important effects on child health, maternal wellbeing and health behaviors. Mothers reported fewer depressive symptoms, attended more antenatal visits and had better baby-feeding practices. Intervention mothers were significantly more likely to exclusively breastfeed for 6 months (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1, 2.9), had lower odds of mixing formula with baby porridge (regarded as detrimental) (OR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2, 0.8) and were less likely to consult traditional healers. Mothers living with HIV were more adherent with co-trimoxazole prophylaxis (p < 0.01). Intervention-group children were significantly less likely to be wasted (OR: 0.5; 95% CI 0.3–0.9) and had significantly fewer symptoms of common childhood illnesses in the preceding two weeks (OR: 0.8; 95% CI: 0.7,0.9). CONCLUSION: The impact of CHWs in a rural area was less pronounced than in peri-urban areas. CHWs are likely to need enhanced support and supervision in the challenging rural context. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7496216 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74962162020-09-21 Community health workers impact on maternal and child health outcomes in rural South Africa – a non-randomized two-group comparison study le Roux, Karl W. Almirol, Ellen Rezvan, Panteha Hayati le Roux, Ingrid M. Mbewu, Nokwanele Dippenaar, Elaine Stansert-Katzen, Linnea Baker, Venetia Tomlinson, Mark Rotheram-Borus, M. J. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Home visits by paraprofessional community health workers (CHWs) has been shown to improve maternal and child health outcomes in research studies in many countries. Yet, when these are scaled or replicated, efficacy disappears. An effective CHW home visiting program in peri-urban Cape Town found maternal and child health benefits over the 5 years point but this study examines if these benefits occur in deeply rural communities. METHODS: A non-randomized, two-group comparison study evaluated the impact of CHW in the rural Eastern Cape from August 2014 to May 2017, with 1310 mother-infant pairs recruited in pregnancy and 89% were reassessed at 6 months post-birth. RESULTS: Home visiting had limited, but important effects on child health, maternal wellbeing and health behaviors. Mothers reported fewer depressive symptoms, attended more antenatal visits and had better baby-feeding practices. Intervention mothers were significantly more likely to exclusively breastfeed for 6 months (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1, 2.9), had lower odds of mixing formula with baby porridge (regarded as detrimental) (OR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2, 0.8) and were less likely to consult traditional healers. Mothers living with HIV were more adherent with co-trimoxazole prophylaxis (p < 0.01). Intervention-group children were significantly less likely to be wasted (OR: 0.5; 95% CI 0.3–0.9) and had significantly fewer symptoms of common childhood illnesses in the preceding two weeks (OR: 0.8; 95% CI: 0.7,0.9). CONCLUSION: The impact of CHWs in a rural area was less pronounced than in peri-urban areas. CHWs are likely to need enhanced support and supervision in the challenging rural context. BioMed Central 2020-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7496216/ /pubmed/32943043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09468-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article le Roux, Karl W. Almirol, Ellen Rezvan, Panteha Hayati le Roux, Ingrid M. Mbewu, Nokwanele Dippenaar, Elaine Stansert-Katzen, Linnea Baker, Venetia Tomlinson, Mark Rotheram-Borus, M. J. Community health workers impact on maternal and child health outcomes in rural South Africa – a non-randomized two-group comparison study |
title | Community health workers impact on maternal and child health outcomes in rural South Africa – a non-randomized two-group comparison study |
title_full | Community health workers impact on maternal and child health outcomes in rural South Africa – a non-randomized two-group comparison study |
title_fullStr | Community health workers impact on maternal and child health outcomes in rural South Africa – a non-randomized two-group comparison study |
title_full_unstemmed | Community health workers impact on maternal and child health outcomes in rural South Africa – a non-randomized two-group comparison study |
title_short | Community health workers impact on maternal and child health outcomes in rural South Africa – a non-randomized two-group comparison study |
title_sort | community health workers impact on maternal and child health outcomes in rural south africa – a non-randomized two-group comparison study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32943043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09468-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lerouxkarlw communityhealthworkersimpactonmaternalandchildhealthoutcomesinruralsouthafricaanonrandomizedtwogroupcomparisonstudy AT almirolellen communityhealthworkersimpactonmaternalandchildhealthoutcomesinruralsouthafricaanonrandomizedtwogroupcomparisonstudy AT rezvanpantehahayati communityhealthworkersimpactonmaternalandchildhealthoutcomesinruralsouthafricaanonrandomizedtwogroupcomparisonstudy AT lerouxingridm communityhealthworkersimpactonmaternalandchildhealthoutcomesinruralsouthafricaanonrandomizedtwogroupcomparisonstudy AT mbewunokwanele communityhealthworkersimpactonmaternalandchildhealthoutcomesinruralsouthafricaanonrandomizedtwogroupcomparisonstudy AT dippenaarelaine communityhealthworkersimpactonmaternalandchildhealthoutcomesinruralsouthafricaanonrandomizedtwogroupcomparisonstudy AT stansertkatzenlinnea communityhealthworkersimpactonmaternalandchildhealthoutcomesinruralsouthafricaanonrandomizedtwogroupcomparisonstudy AT bakervenetia communityhealthworkersimpactonmaternalandchildhealthoutcomesinruralsouthafricaanonrandomizedtwogroupcomparisonstudy AT tomlinsonmark communityhealthworkersimpactonmaternalandchildhealthoutcomesinruralsouthafricaanonrandomizedtwogroupcomparisonstudy AT rotheramborusmj communityhealthworkersimpactonmaternalandchildhealthoutcomesinruralsouthafricaanonrandomizedtwogroupcomparisonstudy |