Cargando…

Community health workers impact on maternal and child health outcomes in rural South Africa – a non-randomized two-group comparison study

BACKGROUND: Home visits by paraprofessional community health workers (CHWs) has been shown to improve maternal and child health outcomes in research studies in many countries. Yet, when these are scaled or replicated, efficacy disappears. An effective CHW home visiting program in peri-urban Cape Tow...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: le Roux, Karl W., Almirol, Ellen, Rezvan, Panteha Hayati, le Roux, Ingrid M., Mbewu, Nokwanele, Dippenaar, Elaine, Stansert-Katzen, Linnea, Baker, Venetia, Tomlinson, Mark, Rotheram-Borus, M. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32943043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09468-w
_version_ 1783583049146957824
author le Roux, Karl W.
Almirol, Ellen
Rezvan, Panteha Hayati
le Roux, Ingrid M.
Mbewu, Nokwanele
Dippenaar, Elaine
Stansert-Katzen, Linnea
Baker, Venetia
Tomlinson, Mark
Rotheram-Borus, M. J.
author_facet le Roux, Karl W.
Almirol, Ellen
Rezvan, Panteha Hayati
le Roux, Ingrid M.
Mbewu, Nokwanele
Dippenaar, Elaine
Stansert-Katzen, Linnea
Baker, Venetia
Tomlinson, Mark
Rotheram-Borus, M. J.
author_sort le Roux, Karl W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Home visits by paraprofessional community health workers (CHWs) has been shown to improve maternal and child health outcomes in research studies in many countries. Yet, when these are scaled or replicated, efficacy disappears. An effective CHW home visiting program in peri-urban Cape Town found maternal and child health benefits over the 5 years point but this study examines if these benefits occur in deeply rural communities. METHODS: A non-randomized, two-group comparison study evaluated the impact of CHW in the rural Eastern Cape from August 2014 to May 2017, with 1310 mother-infant pairs recruited in pregnancy and 89% were reassessed at 6 months post-birth. RESULTS: Home visiting had limited, but important effects on child health, maternal wellbeing and health behaviors. Mothers reported fewer depressive symptoms, attended more antenatal visits and had better baby-feeding practices. Intervention mothers were significantly more likely to exclusively breastfeed for 6 months (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1, 2.9), had lower odds of mixing formula with baby porridge (regarded as detrimental) (OR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2, 0.8) and were less likely to consult traditional healers. Mothers living with HIV were more adherent with co-trimoxazole prophylaxis (p < 0.01). Intervention-group children were significantly less likely to be wasted (OR: 0.5; 95% CI 0.3–0.9) and had significantly fewer symptoms of common childhood illnesses in the preceding two weeks (OR: 0.8; 95% CI: 0.7,0.9). CONCLUSION: The impact of CHWs in a rural area was less pronounced than in peri-urban areas. CHWs are likely to need enhanced support and supervision in the challenging rural context.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7496216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74962162020-09-21 Community health workers impact on maternal and child health outcomes in rural South Africa – a non-randomized two-group comparison study le Roux, Karl W. Almirol, Ellen Rezvan, Panteha Hayati le Roux, Ingrid M. Mbewu, Nokwanele Dippenaar, Elaine Stansert-Katzen, Linnea Baker, Venetia Tomlinson, Mark Rotheram-Borus, M. J. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Home visits by paraprofessional community health workers (CHWs) has been shown to improve maternal and child health outcomes in research studies in many countries. Yet, when these are scaled or replicated, efficacy disappears. An effective CHW home visiting program in peri-urban Cape Town found maternal and child health benefits over the 5 years point but this study examines if these benefits occur in deeply rural communities. METHODS: A non-randomized, two-group comparison study evaluated the impact of CHW in the rural Eastern Cape from August 2014 to May 2017, with 1310 mother-infant pairs recruited in pregnancy and 89% were reassessed at 6 months post-birth. RESULTS: Home visiting had limited, but important effects on child health, maternal wellbeing and health behaviors. Mothers reported fewer depressive symptoms, attended more antenatal visits and had better baby-feeding practices. Intervention mothers were significantly more likely to exclusively breastfeed for 6 months (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1, 2.9), had lower odds of mixing formula with baby porridge (regarded as detrimental) (OR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2, 0.8) and were less likely to consult traditional healers. Mothers living with HIV were more adherent with co-trimoxazole prophylaxis (p < 0.01). Intervention-group children were significantly less likely to be wasted (OR: 0.5; 95% CI 0.3–0.9) and had significantly fewer symptoms of common childhood illnesses in the preceding two weeks (OR: 0.8; 95% CI: 0.7,0.9). CONCLUSION: The impact of CHWs in a rural area was less pronounced than in peri-urban areas. CHWs are likely to need enhanced support and supervision in the challenging rural context. BioMed Central 2020-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7496216/ /pubmed/32943043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09468-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
le Roux, Karl W.
Almirol, Ellen
Rezvan, Panteha Hayati
le Roux, Ingrid M.
Mbewu, Nokwanele
Dippenaar, Elaine
Stansert-Katzen, Linnea
Baker, Venetia
Tomlinson, Mark
Rotheram-Borus, M. J.
Community health workers impact on maternal and child health outcomes in rural South Africa – a non-randomized two-group comparison study
title Community health workers impact on maternal and child health outcomes in rural South Africa – a non-randomized two-group comparison study
title_full Community health workers impact on maternal and child health outcomes in rural South Africa – a non-randomized two-group comparison study
title_fullStr Community health workers impact on maternal and child health outcomes in rural South Africa – a non-randomized two-group comparison study
title_full_unstemmed Community health workers impact on maternal and child health outcomes in rural South Africa – a non-randomized two-group comparison study
title_short Community health workers impact on maternal and child health outcomes in rural South Africa – a non-randomized two-group comparison study
title_sort community health workers impact on maternal and child health outcomes in rural south africa – a non-randomized two-group comparison study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32943043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09468-w
work_keys_str_mv AT lerouxkarlw communityhealthworkersimpactonmaternalandchildhealthoutcomesinruralsouthafricaanonrandomizedtwogroupcomparisonstudy
AT almirolellen communityhealthworkersimpactonmaternalandchildhealthoutcomesinruralsouthafricaanonrandomizedtwogroupcomparisonstudy
AT rezvanpantehahayati communityhealthworkersimpactonmaternalandchildhealthoutcomesinruralsouthafricaanonrandomizedtwogroupcomparisonstudy
AT lerouxingridm communityhealthworkersimpactonmaternalandchildhealthoutcomesinruralsouthafricaanonrandomizedtwogroupcomparisonstudy
AT mbewunokwanele communityhealthworkersimpactonmaternalandchildhealthoutcomesinruralsouthafricaanonrandomizedtwogroupcomparisonstudy
AT dippenaarelaine communityhealthworkersimpactonmaternalandchildhealthoutcomesinruralsouthafricaanonrandomizedtwogroupcomparisonstudy
AT stansertkatzenlinnea communityhealthworkersimpactonmaternalandchildhealthoutcomesinruralsouthafricaanonrandomizedtwogroupcomparisonstudy
AT bakervenetia communityhealthworkersimpactonmaternalandchildhealthoutcomesinruralsouthafricaanonrandomizedtwogroupcomparisonstudy
AT tomlinsonmark communityhealthworkersimpactonmaternalandchildhealthoutcomesinruralsouthafricaanonrandomizedtwogroupcomparisonstudy
AT rotheramborusmj communityhealthworkersimpactonmaternalandchildhealthoutcomesinruralsouthafricaanonrandomizedtwogroupcomparisonstudy