Cargando…
A multicentre, randomized, double‐masked, parallel group, vehicle‐controlled phase IIb study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1% and 3% topical minocycline gel in patients with papulopustular rosacea
BACKGROUND: Papulopustular rosacea is characterized by chronic facial erythema and inflammatory facial lesions. Minocycline has anti‐inflammatory properties which may be effective in the treatment of rosacea inflammatory lesions. OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of once‐daily topical mi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31907924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18857 |
_version_ | 1783583056439803904 |
---|---|
author | Webster, G. Draelos, Z.D. Graber, E. Lee, M.S. Dhawan, S. Salman, M. Magrath, G.N. |
author_facet | Webster, G. Draelos, Z.D. Graber, E. Lee, M.S. Dhawan, S. Salman, M. Magrath, G.N. |
author_sort | Webster, G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Papulopustular rosacea is characterized by chronic facial erythema and inflammatory facial lesions. Minocycline has anti‐inflammatory properties which may be effective in the treatment of rosacea inflammatory lesions. OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of once‐daily topical minocycline gel 1% and 3% in patients with papulopustular rosacea. METHODS: This was a prospective, 12‐week, double‐blinded study conducted at 26 sites in the United States; 270 patients with papulopustular rosacea and 12–40 inflammatory lesions were randomized to minocycline 1%, minocycline 3% or vehicle. The primary endpoint was the mean change in inflammatory lesions at week 12. Key secondary endpoints included success on an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA). RESULTS: Baseline mean lesion counts were 24·6, 25·1 and 24·3 in the minocycline 1%, minocycline 3% and vehicle groups, respectively; at week 12, the counts had decreased by 12·6, 13·1 and 7·9, respectively. Minocycline significantly decreased lesions, compared with the vehicle [P = 0·01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7·9 to 0·9, for minocycline 1%; P = 0·007, 95% CI 8·3 to 1·3, for minocycline 3%]. The proportion of patients achieving IGA success was 39% in the minocycline 1% arm [P = 0·34, odds ratio (OR) 1·396 and OR 95% CI 0·71 to 2·75 vs. vehicle], 46% in the minocycline 3% arm (P = 0·04, OR 2·03 and OR 95% CI 1·04 to 3·95 vs. vehicle) and 31% in the vehicle arm. CONCLUSIONS: Minocycline topical gel appears to be safe and tolerable at concentrations of 1% and 3%, and both concentrations significantly decreased inflammatory lesion counts, with a significantly larger proportion of patients achieving IGA success at week 12 in the minocycline 3% arm. These findings support further evaluation of minocycline gel for treating inflammatory lesions associated with papulopustular rosacea. Linked Comment: Hampton. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:412–413. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7496252 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74962522020-09-25 A multicentre, randomized, double‐masked, parallel group, vehicle‐controlled phase IIb study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1% and 3% topical minocycline gel in patients with papulopustular rosacea Webster, G. Draelos, Z.D. Graber, E. Lee, M.S. Dhawan, S. Salman, M. Magrath, G.N. Br J Dermatol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Papulopustular rosacea is characterized by chronic facial erythema and inflammatory facial lesions. Minocycline has anti‐inflammatory properties which may be effective in the treatment of rosacea inflammatory lesions. OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of once‐daily topical minocycline gel 1% and 3% in patients with papulopustular rosacea. METHODS: This was a prospective, 12‐week, double‐blinded study conducted at 26 sites in the United States; 270 patients with papulopustular rosacea and 12–40 inflammatory lesions were randomized to minocycline 1%, minocycline 3% or vehicle. The primary endpoint was the mean change in inflammatory lesions at week 12. Key secondary endpoints included success on an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA). RESULTS: Baseline mean lesion counts were 24·6, 25·1 and 24·3 in the minocycline 1%, minocycline 3% and vehicle groups, respectively; at week 12, the counts had decreased by 12·6, 13·1 and 7·9, respectively. Minocycline significantly decreased lesions, compared with the vehicle [P = 0·01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7·9 to 0·9, for minocycline 1%; P = 0·007, 95% CI 8·3 to 1·3, for minocycline 3%]. The proportion of patients achieving IGA success was 39% in the minocycline 1% arm [P = 0·34, odds ratio (OR) 1·396 and OR 95% CI 0·71 to 2·75 vs. vehicle], 46% in the minocycline 3% arm (P = 0·04, OR 2·03 and OR 95% CI 1·04 to 3·95 vs. vehicle) and 31% in the vehicle arm. CONCLUSIONS: Minocycline topical gel appears to be safe and tolerable at concentrations of 1% and 3%, and both concentrations significantly decreased inflammatory lesion counts, with a significantly larger proportion of patients achieving IGA success at week 12 in the minocycline 3% arm. These findings support further evaluation of minocycline gel for treating inflammatory lesions associated with papulopustular rosacea. Linked Comment: Hampton. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:412–413. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-14 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7496252/ /pubmed/31907924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18857 Text en © 2020 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Webster, G. Draelos, Z.D. Graber, E. Lee, M.S. Dhawan, S. Salman, M. Magrath, G.N. A multicentre, randomized, double‐masked, parallel group, vehicle‐controlled phase IIb study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1% and 3% topical minocycline gel in patients with papulopustular rosacea |
title | A multicentre, randomized, double‐masked, parallel group, vehicle‐controlled phase IIb study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1% and 3% topical minocycline gel in patients with papulopustular rosacea
|
title_full | A multicentre, randomized, double‐masked, parallel group, vehicle‐controlled phase IIb study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1% and 3% topical minocycline gel in patients with papulopustular rosacea
|
title_fullStr | A multicentre, randomized, double‐masked, parallel group, vehicle‐controlled phase IIb study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1% and 3% topical minocycline gel in patients with papulopustular rosacea
|
title_full_unstemmed | A multicentre, randomized, double‐masked, parallel group, vehicle‐controlled phase IIb study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1% and 3% topical minocycline gel in patients with papulopustular rosacea
|
title_short | A multicentre, randomized, double‐masked, parallel group, vehicle‐controlled phase IIb study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1% and 3% topical minocycline gel in patients with papulopustular rosacea
|
title_sort | multicentre, randomized, double‐masked, parallel group, vehicle‐controlled phase iib study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1% and 3% topical minocycline gel in patients with papulopustular rosacea |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31907924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18857 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT websterg amulticentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea AT draeloszd amulticentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea AT grabere amulticentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea AT leems amulticentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea AT dhawans amulticentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea AT salmanm amulticentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea AT magrathgn amulticentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea AT websterg multicentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea AT draeloszd multicentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea AT grabere multicentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea AT leems multicentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea AT dhawans multicentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea AT salmanm multicentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea AT magrathgn multicentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea |