Cargando…

A multicentre, randomized, double‐masked, parallel group, vehicle‐controlled phase IIb study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1% and 3% topical minocycline gel in patients with papulopustular rosacea

BACKGROUND: Papulopustular rosacea is characterized by chronic facial erythema and inflammatory facial lesions. Minocycline has anti‐inflammatory properties which may be effective in the treatment of rosacea inflammatory lesions. OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of once‐daily topical mi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Webster, G., Draelos, Z.D., Graber, E., Lee, M.S., Dhawan, S., Salman, M., Magrath, G.N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31907924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18857
_version_ 1783583056439803904
author Webster, G.
Draelos, Z.D.
Graber, E.
Lee, M.S.
Dhawan, S.
Salman, M.
Magrath, G.N.
author_facet Webster, G.
Draelos, Z.D.
Graber, E.
Lee, M.S.
Dhawan, S.
Salman, M.
Magrath, G.N.
author_sort Webster, G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Papulopustular rosacea is characterized by chronic facial erythema and inflammatory facial lesions. Minocycline has anti‐inflammatory properties which may be effective in the treatment of rosacea inflammatory lesions. OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of once‐daily topical minocycline gel 1% and 3% in patients with papulopustular rosacea. METHODS: This was a prospective, 12‐week, double‐blinded study conducted at 26 sites in the United States; 270 patients with papulopustular rosacea and 12–40 inflammatory lesions were randomized to minocycline 1%, minocycline 3% or vehicle. The primary endpoint was the mean change in inflammatory lesions at week 12. Key secondary endpoints included success on an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA). RESULTS: Baseline mean lesion counts were 24·6, 25·1 and 24·3 in the minocycline 1%, minocycline 3% and vehicle groups, respectively; at week 12, the counts had decreased by 12·6, 13·1 and 7·9, respectively. Minocycline significantly decreased lesions, compared with the vehicle [P = 0·01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7·9 to 0·9, for minocycline 1%; P = 0·007, 95% CI 8·3 to 1·3, for minocycline 3%]. The proportion of patients achieving IGA success was 39% in the minocycline 1% arm [P = 0·34, odds ratio (OR) 1·396 and OR 95% CI 0·71 to 2·75 vs. vehicle], 46% in the minocycline 3% arm (P = 0·04, OR 2·03 and OR 95% CI 1·04 to 3·95 vs. vehicle) and 31% in the vehicle arm. CONCLUSIONS: Minocycline topical gel appears to be safe and tolerable at concentrations of 1% and 3%, and both concentrations significantly decreased inflammatory lesion counts, with a significantly larger proportion of patients achieving IGA success at week 12 in the minocycline 3% arm. These findings support further evaluation of minocycline gel for treating inflammatory lesions associated with papulopustular rosacea. Linked Comment: Hampton. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:412–413.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7496252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74962522020-09-25 A multicentre, randomized, double‐masked, parallel group, vehicle‐controlled phase IIb study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1% and 3% topical minocycline gel in patients with papulopustular rosacea Webster, G. Draelos, Z.D. Graber, E. Lee, M.S. Dhawan, S. Salman, M. Magrath, G.N. Br J Dermatol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Papulopustular rosacea is characterized by chronic facial erythema and inflammatory facial lesions. Minocycline has anti‐inflammatory properties which may be effective in the treatment of rosacea inflammatory lesions. OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of once‐daily topical minocycline gel 1% and 3% in patients with papulopustular rosacea. METHODS: This was a prospective, 12‐week, double‐blinded study conducted at 26 sites in the United States; 270 patients with papulopustular rosacea and 12–40 inflammatory lesions were randomized to minocycline 1%, minocycline 3% or vehicle. The primary endpoint was the mean change in inflammatory lesions at week 12. Key secondary endpoints included success on an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA). RESULTS: Baseline mean lesion counts were 24·6, 25·1 and 24·3 in the minocycline 1%, minocycline 3% and vehicle groups, respectively; at week 12, the counts had decreased by 12·6, 13·1 and 7·9, respectively. Minocycline significantly decreased lesions, compared with the vehicle [P = 0·01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7·9 to 0·9, for minocycline 1%; P = 0·007, 95% CI 8·3 to 1·3, for minocycline 3%]. The proportion of patients achieving IGA success was 39% in the minocycline 1% arm [P = 0·34, odds ratio (OR) 1·396 and OR 95% CI 0·71 to 2·75 vs. vehicle], 46% in the minocycline 3% arm (P = 0·04, OR 2·03 and OR 95% CI 1·04 to 3·95 vs. vehicle) and 31% in the vehicle arm. CONCLUSIONS: Minocycline topical gel appears to be safe and tolerable at concentrations of 1% and 3%, and both concentrations significantly decreased inflammatory lesion counts, with a significantly larger proportion of patients achieving IGA success at week 12 in the minocycline 3% arm. These findings support further evaluation of minocycline gel for treating inflammatory lesions associated with papulopustular rosacea. Linked Comment: Hampton. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:412–413. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-14 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7496252/ /pubmed/31907924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18857 Text en © 2020 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Webster, G.
Draelos, Z.D.
Graber, E.
Lee, M.S.
Dhawan, S.
Salman, M.
Magrath, G.N.
A multicentre, randomized, double‐masked, parallel group, vehicle‐controlled phase IIb study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1% and 3% topical minocycline gel in patients with papulopustular rosacea
title A multicentre, randomized, double‐masked, parallel group, vehicle‐controlled phase IIb study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1% and 3% topical minocycline gel in patients with papulopustular rosacea
title_full A multicentre, randomized, double‐masked, parallel group, vehicle‐controlled phase IIb study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1% and 3% topical minocycline gel in patients with papulopustular rosacea
title_fullStr A multicentre, randomized, double‐masked, parallel group, vehicle‐controlled phase IIb study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1% and 3% topical minocycline gel in patients with papulopustular rosacea
title_full_unstemmed A multicentre, randomized, double‐masked, parallel group, vehicle‐controlled phase IIb study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1% and 3% topical minocycline gel in patients with papulopustular rosacea
title_short A multicentre, randomized, double‐masked, parallel group, vehicle‐controlled phase IIb study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1% and 3% topical minocycline gel in patients with papulopustular rosacea
title_sort multicentre, randomized, double‐masked, parallel group, vehicle‐controlled phase iib study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1% and 3% topical minocycline gel in patients with papulopustular rosacea
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31907924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18857
work_keys_str_mv AT websterg amulticentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea
AT draeloszd amulticentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea
AT grabere amulticentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea
AT leems amulticentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea
AT dhawans amulticentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea
AT salmanm amulticentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea
AT magrathgn amulticentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea
AT websterg multicentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea
AT draeloszd multicentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea
AT grabere multicentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea
AT leems multicentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea
AT dhawans multicentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea
AT salmanm multicentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea
AT magrathgn multicentrerandomizeddoublemaskedparallelgroupvehiclecontrolledphaseiibstudytoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyof1and3topicalminocyclinegelinpatientswithpapulopustularrosacea