Cargando…

Enhanced sampling of protein conformational states for dynamic cross‐docking within the protein‐protein docking server SwarmDock

The formation of specific protein‐protein interactions is often a key to a protein's function. During complex formation, each protein component will undergo a change in the conformational state, for some these changes are relatively small and reside primarily at the sidechain level; however, ot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torchala, Mieczyslaw, Gerguri, Tereza, Chaleil, Raphael A. G., Gordon, Patrick, Russell, Francis, Keshani, Miriam, Bates, Paul A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31697436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prot.25851
_version_ 1783583070580899840
author Torchala, Mieczyslaw
Gerguri, Tereza
Chaleil, Raphael A. G.
Gordon, Patrick
Russell, Francis
Keshani, Miriam
Bates, Paul A.
author_facet Torchala, Mieczyslaw
Gerguri, Tereza
Chaleil, Raphael A. G.
Gordon, Patrick
Russell, Francis
Keshani, Miriam
Bates, Paul A.
author_sort Torchala, Mieczyslaw
collection PubMed
description The formation of specific protein‐protein interactions is often a key to a protein's function. During complex formation, each protein component will undergo a change in the conformational state, for some these changes are relatively small and reside primarily at the sidechain level; however, others may display notable backbone adjustments. One of the classic problems in the protein‐docking field is to be able to a priori predict the extent of such conformational changes. In this work, we investigated three protocols to find the most suitable input structure conformations for cross‐docking, including a robust sampling approach in normal mode space. Counterintuitively, knowledge of the theoretically best combination of normal modes for unbound‐bound transitions does not always lead to the best results. We used a novel spatial partitioning library, Aether Engine (see Supplementary Materials), to efficiently search the conformational states of 56 receptor/ligand pairs, including a recent CAPRI target, in a systematic manner and selected diverse conformations as input to our automated docking server, SwarmDock, a server that allows moderate conformational adjustments during the docking process. In essence, here we present a dynamic cross‐docking protocol, which when benchmarked against the simpler approach of just docking the unbound components shows a 10% uplift in the quality of the top docking pose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7496321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74963212020-09-25 Enhanced sampling of protein conformational states for dynamic cross‐docking within the protein‐protein docking server SwarmDock Torchala, Mieczyslaw Gerguri, Tereza Chaleil, Raphael A. G. Gordon, Patrick Russell, Francis Keshani, Miriam Bates, Paul A. Proteins Research Articles The formation of specific protein‐protein interactions is often a key to a protein's function. During complex formation, each protein component will undergo a change in the conformational state, for some these changes are relatively small and reside primarily at the sidechain level; however, others may display notable backbone adjustments. One of the classic problems in the protein‐docking field is to be able to a priori predict the extent of such conformational changes. In this work, we investigated three protocols to find the most suitable input structure conformations for cross‐docking, including a robust sampling approach in normal mode space. Counterintuitively, knowledge of the theoretically best combination of normal modes for unbound‐bound transitions does not always lead to the best results. We used a novel spatial partitioning library, Aether Engine (see Supplementary Materials), to efficiently search the conformational states of 56 receptor/ligand pairs, including a recent CAPRI target, in a systematic manner and selected diverse conformations as input to our automated docking server, SwarmDock, a server that allows moderate conformational adjustments during the docking process. In essence, here we present a dynamic cross‐docking protocol, which when benchmarked against the simpler approach of just docking the unbound components shows a 10% uplift in the quality of the top docking pose. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-11-20 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7496321/ /pubmed/31697436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prot.25851 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Torchala, Mieczyslaw
Gerguri, Tereza
Chaleil, Raphael A. G.
Gordon, Patrick
Russell, Francis
Keshani, Miriam
Bates, Paul A.
Enhanced sampling of protein conformational states for dynamic cross‐docking within the protein‐protein docking server SwarmDock
title Enhanced sampling of protein conformational states for dynamic cross‐docking within the protein‐protein docking server SwarmDock
title_full Enhanced sampling of protein conformational states for dynamic cross‐docking within the protein‐protein docking server SwarmDock
title_fullStr Enhanced sampling of protein conformational states for dynamic cross‐docking within the protein‐protein docking server SwarmDock
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced sampling of protein conformational states for dynamic cross‐docking within the protein‐protein docking server SwarmDock
title_short Enhanced sampling of protein conformational states for dynamic cross‐docking within the protein‐protein docking server SwarmDock
title_sort enhanced sampling of protein conformational states for dynamic cross‐docking within the protein‐protein docking server swarmdock
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31697436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prot.25851
work_keys_str_mv AT torchalamieczyslaw enhancedsamplingofproteinconformationalstatesfordynamiccrossdockingwithintheproteinproteindockingserverswarmdock
AT gerguritereza enhancedsamplingofproteinconformationalstatesfordynamiccrossdockingwithintheproteinproteindockingserverswarmdock
AT chaleilraphaelag enhancedsamplingofproteinconformationalstatesfordynamiccrossdockingwithintheproteinproteindockingserverswarmdock
AT gordonpatrick enhancedsamplingofproteinconformationalstatesfordynamiccrossdockingwithintheproteinproteindockingserverswarmdock
AT russellfrancis enhancedsamplingofproteinconformationalstatesfordynamiccrossdockingwithintheproteinproteindockingserverswarmdock
AT keshanimiriam enhancedsamplingofproteinconformationalstatesfordynamiccrossdockingwithintheproteinproteindockingserverswarmdock
AT batespaula enhancedsamplingofproteinconformationalstatesfordynamiccrossdockingwithintheproteinproteindockingserverswarmdock