Cargando…

A Field Study Method as a Potential Higher Tier Option to Refine Herbicide Risk Assessment for Nontarget Terrestrial Plants

During herbicide spray application, nontarget terrestrial plants (NTTPs) growing in the off‐field area need to be protected from unacceptable effects of herbicide drift. The risk of such unintended effects is assessed in order to establish whether a particular use can be approved, possibly in combin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Isemer, Rena, Mihan, Christine, Peeters, Stephanie, Rumohr, Quintana, Toschki, Andreas, Ducrot, Virginie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32162779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4263
_version_ 1783583129665011712
author Isemer, Rena
Mihan, Christine
Peeters, Stephanie
Rumohr, Quintana
Toschki, Andreas
Ducrot, Virginie
author_facet Isemer, Rena
Mihan, Christine
Peeters, Stephanie
Rumohr, Quintana
Toschki, Andreas
Ducrot, Virginie
author_sort Isemer, Rena
collection PubMed
description During herbicide spray application, nontarget terrestrial plants (NTTPs) growing in the off‐field area need to be protected from unacceptable effects of herbicide drift. The risk of such unintended effects is assessed in order to establish whether a particular use can be approved, possibly in combination with mitigation measures. In Europe, the risk of herbicide treatment to NTTPs is assessed on the basis of tier 2 studies done under controlled conditions in greenhouses. Following the concept of a tiered testing approach, higher tier field studies under more realistic conditions could be used to refine the risk assessment. No current guideline for conducting higher tier NTTP field studies is available. We developed an NTTP higher tier field study method done on an experimental plant community established by sowing of a seed mixture. The setup was optimized in 3 pilot field studies and subsequently used for a definitive study testing effects of the herbicide iofensulfuron‐sodium. Results show that the method can be regarded as a suitable higher tier option for assessing effects of herbicides on NTTPs. Growth of species from the soil seed bank cannot be avoided and has to be carefully considered when evaluating results. Adaptations of the study design may be necessary when testing different herbicides. Community‐level endpoints were at the same level as single‐species endpoints. Results of the field study were compared to standard greenhouse study results for the same herbicide. No observed effect rates (NOERs) in the field were about a factor of 10 higher and show that the current tier 2 risk assessment for NTTPs can be regarded as protective in this case. Whether the present field study design and the assessed endpoints can be used in higher tier risk assessment of NTTPs depends on selection of the specific protection goal and requires further discussion. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2020;16:691–705. © 2020 Bayer AG. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7496580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74965802020-09-25 A Field Study Method as a Potential Higher Tier Option to Refine Herbicide Risk Assessment for Nontarget Terrestrial Plants Isemer, Rena Mihan, Christine Peeters, Stephanie Rumohr, Quintana Toschki, Andreas Ducrot, Virginie Integr Environ Assess Manag Health & Ecological Risk Assessment During herbicide spray application, nontarget terrestrial plants (NTTPs) growing in the off‐field area need to be protected from unacceptable effects of herbicide drift. The risk of such unintended effects is assessed in order to establish whether a particular use can be approved, possibly in combination with mitigation measures. In Europe, the risk of herbicide treatment to NTTPs is assessed on the basis of tier 2 studies done under controlled conditions in greenhouses. Following the concept of a tiered testing approach, higher tier field studies under more realistic conditions could be used to refine the risk assessment. No current guideline for conducting higher tier NTTP field studies is available. We developed an NTTP higher tier field study method done on an experimental plant community established by sowing of a seed mixture. The setup was optimized in 3 pilot field studies and subsequently used for a definitive study testing effects of the herbicide iofensulfuron‐sodium. Results show that the method can be regarded as a suitable higher tier option for assessing effects of herbicides on NTTPs. Growth of species from the soil seed bank cannot be avoided and has to be carefully considered when evaluating results. Adaptations of the study design may be necessary when testing different herbicides. Community‐level endpoints were at the same level as single‐species endpoints. Results of the field study were compared to standard greenhouse study results for the same herbicide. No observed effect rates (NOERs) in the field were about a factor of 10 higher and show that the current tier 2 risk assessment for NTTPs can be regarded as protective in this case. Whether the present field study design and the assessed endpoints can be used in higher tier risk assessment of NTTPs depends on selection of the specific protection goal and requires further discussion. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2020;16:691–705. © 2020 Bayer AG. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC) John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-16 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7496580/ /pubmed/32162779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4263 Text en © 2020 Bayer AG. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC) This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Health & Ecological Risk Assessment
Isemer, Rena
Mihan, Christine
Peeters, Stephanie
Rumohr, Quintana
Toschki, Andreas
Ducrot, Virginie
A Field Study Method as a Potential Higher Tier Option to Refine Herbicide Risk Assessment for Nontarget Terrestrial Plants
title A Field Study Method as a Potential Higher Tier Option to Refine Herbicide Risk Assessment for Nontarget Terrestrial Plants
title_full A Field Study Method as a Potential Higher Tier Option to Refine Herbicide Risk Assessment for Nontarget Terrestrial Plants
title_fullStr A Field Study Method as a Potential Higher Tier Option to Refine Herbicide Risk Assessment for Nontarget Terrestrial Plants
title_full_unstemmed A Field Study Method as a Potential Higher Tier Option to Refine Herbicide Risk Assessment for Nontarget Terrestrial Plants
title_short A Field Study Method as a Potential Higher Tier Option to Refine Herbicide Risk Assessment for Nontarget Terrestrial Plants
title_sort field study method as a potential higher tier option to refine herbicide risk assessment for nontarget terrestrial plants
topic Health & Ecological Risk Assessment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32162779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4263
work_keys_str_mv AT isemerrena afieldstudymethodasapotentialhighertieroptiontorefineherbicideriskassessmentfornontargetterrestrialplants
AT mihanchristine afieldstudymethodasapotentialhighertieroptiontorefineherbicideriskassessmentfornontargetterrestrialplants
AT peetersstephanie afieldstudymethodasapotentialhighertieroptiontorefineherbicideriskassessmentfornontargetterrestrialplants
AT rumohrquintana afieldstudymethodasapotentialhighertieroptiontorefineherbicideriskassessmentfornontargetterrestrialplants
AT toschkiandreas afieldstudymethodasapotentialhighertieroptiontorefineherbicideriskassessmentfornontargetterrestrialplants
AT ducrotvirginie afieldstudymethodasapotentialhighertieroptiontorefineherbicideriskassessmentfornontargetterrestrialplants
AT isemerrena fieldstudymethodasapotentialhighertieroptiontorefineherbicideriskassessmentfornontargetterrestrialplants
AT mihanchristine fieldstudymethodasapotentialhighertieroptiontorefineherbicideriskassessmentfornontargetterrestrialplants
AT peetersstephanie fieldstudymethodasapotentialhighertieroptiontorefineherbicideriskassessmentfornontargetterrestrialplants
AT rumohrquintana fieldstudymethodasapotentialhighertieroptiontorefineherbicideriskassessmentfornontargetterrestrialplants
AT toschkiandreas fieldstudymethodasapotentialhighertieroptiontorefineherbicideriskassessmentfornontargetterrestrialplants
AT ducrotvirginie fieldstudymethodasapotentialhighertieroptiontorefineherbicideriskassessmentfornontargetterrestrialplants