Cargando…

Validity and Reliability of Screening Measures for Depression and Anxiety Disorders in Rheumatoid Arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To test the validity and reliability of screening instruments for depression and anxiety in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Participants with RA completed the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ‐2 or PHQ‐9), the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System depression short f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hitchon, Carol A., Zhang, Lixia, Peschken, Christine A., Lix, Lisa M., Graff, Lesley A., Fisk, John D., Patten, Scott B., Bolton, James, Sareen, Jitender, El‐Gabalawy, Renée, Marriott, James, Bernstein, Charles N., Marrie, Ruth Ann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31199570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.24011
_version_ 1783583150695251968
author Hitchon, Carol A.
Zhang, Lixia
Peschken, Christine A.
Lix, Lisa M.
Graff, Lesley A.
Fisk, John D.
Patten, Scott B.
Bolton, James
Sareen, Jitender
El‐Gabalawy, Renée
Marriott, James
Bernstein, Charles N.
Marrie, Ruth Ann
author_facet Hitchon, Carol A.
Zhang, Lixia
Peschken, Christine A.
Lix, Lisa M.
Graff, Lesley A.
Fisk, John D.
Patten, Scott B.
Bolton, James
Sareen, Jitender
El‐Gabalawy, Renée
Marriott, James
Bernstein, Charles N.
Marrie, Ruth Ann
author_sort Hitchon, Carol A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To test the validity and reliability of screening instruments for depression and anxiety in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Participants with RA completed the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ‐2 or PHQ‐9), the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System depression short form 8a and anxiety short form 8a, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale anxiety score (HADS‐A) and depression score (HADS‐D), the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2‐ and 7‐item scales, and the Kessler‐6 scale. Clinical depression and anxiety disorders were confirmed using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Axis I Disorders (SCID‐1) research version. We reported sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value using SCID‐1 diagnoses as the criterion standard. Test–retest reliability was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Of 150 participants, 11.3% had SCID‐1–diagnosed depression, 7.3% had SCID‐1–diagnosed generalized anxiety disorder, and 19.3% had any SCID‐1–diagnosed anxiety disorder. For depression, sensitivity ranged from HADS‐D (cut point 11; 35%) to PHQ‐2 (88%) and PHQ‐9 (87%). Specificity ranged from PHQ‐9 (77%) and PHQ‐2 (84%) to HADS‐D (cut point 11; 94%). Positive predictive value ranged from 30% to 43%. Negative predictive value ranged from 92% to 98%. For generalized anxiety disorder, sensitivity ranged from HADS‐A (cut point 11; 45%) to HADS‐A (cut point 8; 91%). Specificity ranged from 81% to 89% for all measures except the HADS‐A (cut point 8; 63%). Intraclass correlation coefficient estimates ranging from 0.69 to 0.88 confirmed good test–retest reliability. CONCLUSION: Depression screening instruments had good diagnostic performance; anxiety instruments were more variable. Identified depression and anxiety require clinical confirmation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7496677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74966772020-09-25 Validity and Reliability of Screening Measures for Depression and Anxiety Disorders in Rheumatoid Arthritis Hitchon, Carol A. Zhang, Lixia Peschken, Christine A. Lix, Lisa M. Graff, Lesley A. Fisk, John D. Patten, Scott B. Bolton, James Sareen, Jitender El‐Gabalawy, Renée Marriott, James Bernstein, Charles N. Marrie, Ruth Ann Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Rheumatoid Arthritis OBJECTIVE: To test the validity and reliability of screening instruments for depression and anxiety in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Participants with RA completed the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ‐2 or PHQ‐9), the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System depression short form 8a and anxiety short form 8a, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale anxiety score (HADS‐A) and depression score (HADS‐D), the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2‐ and 7‐item scales, and the Kessler‐6 scale. Clinical depression and anxiety disorders were confirmed using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Axis I Disorders (SCID‐1) research version. We reported sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value using SCID‐1 diagnoses as the criterion standard. Test–retest reliability was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Of 150 participants, 11.3% had SCID‐1–diagnosed depression, 7.3% had SCID‐1–diagnosed generalized anxiety disorder, and 19.3% had any SCID‐1–diagnosed anxiety disorder. For depression, sensitivity ranged from HADS‐D (cut point 11; 35%) to PHQ‐2 (88%) and PHQ‐9 (87%). Specificity ranged from PHQ‐9 (77%) and PHQ‐2 (84%) to HADS‐D (cut point 11; 94%). Positive predictive value ranged from 30% to 43%. Negative predictive value ranged from 92% to 98%. For generalized anxiety disorder, sensitivity ranged from HADS‐A (cut point 11; 45%) to HADS‐A (cut point 8; 91%). Specificity ranged from 81% to 89% for all measures except the HADS‐A (cut point 8; 63%). Intraclass correlation coefficient estimates ranging from 0.69 to 0.88 confirmed good test–retest reliability. CONCLUSION: Depression screening instruments had good diagnostic performance; anxiety instruments were more variable. Identified depression and anxiety require clinical confirmation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-08 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7496677/ /pubmed/31199570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.24011 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Arthritis Care & Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Rheumatology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Rheumatoid Arthritis
Hitchon, Carol A.
Zhang, Lixia
Peschken, Christine A.
Lix, Lisa M.
Graff, Lesley A.
Fisk, John D.
Patten, Scott B.
Bolton, James
Sareen, Jitender
El‐Gabalawy, Renée
Marriott, James
Bernstein, Charles N.
Marrie, Ruth Ann
Validity and Reliability of Screening Measures for Depression and Anxiety Disorders in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title Validity and Reliability of Screening Measures for Depression and Anxiety Disorders in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_full Validity and Reliability of Screening Measures for Depression and Anxiety Disorders in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_fullStr Validity and Reliability of Screening Measures for Depression and Anxiety Disorders in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Reliability of Screening Measures for Depression and Anxiety Disorders in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_short Validity and Reliability of Screening Measures for Depression and Anxiety Disorders in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_sort validity and reliability of screening measures for depression and anxiety disorders in rheumatoid arthritis
topic Rheumatoid Arthritis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31199570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.24011
work_keys_str_mv AT hitchoncarola validityandreliabilityofscreeningmeasuresfordepressionandanxietydisordersinrheumatoidarthritis
AT zhanglixia validityandreliabilityofscreeningmeasuresfordepressionandanxietydisordersinrheumatoidarthritis
AT peschkenchristinea validityandreliabilityofscreeningmeasuresfordepressionandanxietydisordersinrheumatoidarthritis
AT lixlisam validityandreliabilityofscreeningmeasuresfordepressionandanxietydisordersinrheumatoidarthritis
AT grafflesleya validityandreliabilityofscreeningmeasuresfordepressionandanxietydisordersinrheumatoidarthritis
AT fiskjohnd validityandreliabilityofscreeningmeasuresfordepressionandanxietydisordersinrheumatoidarthritis
AT pattenscottb validityandreliabilityofscreeningmeasuresfordepressionandanxietydisordersinrheumatoidarthritis
AT boltonjames validityandreliabilityofscreeningmeasuresfordepressionandanxietydisordersinrheumatoidarthritis
AT sareenjitender validityandreliabilityofscreeningmeasuresfordepressionandanxietydisordersinrheumatoidarthritis
AT elgabalawyrenee validityandreliabilityofscreeningmeasuresfordepressionandanxietydisordersinrheumatoidarthritis
AT marriottjames validityandreliabilityofscreeningmeasuresfordepressionandanxietydisordersinrheumatoidarthritis
AT bernsteincharlesn validityandreliabilityofscreeningmeasuresfordepressionandanxietydisordersinrheumatoidarthritis
AT marrieruthann validityandreliabilityofscreeningmeasuresfordepressionandanxietydisordersinrheumatoidarthritis