Cargando…

Quantitative MRCP Imaging: Accuracy, Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Cohort‐Derived Normative Ranges

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is an important tool for noninvasive imaging of biliary disease, however, its assessment is currently subjective, resulting in the need for objective biomarkers. PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy, scan/rescan repeatability, and cross‐...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goldfinger, Marc H., Ridgway, Gerard R., Ferreira, Carlos, Langford, Caitlin R., Cheng, Lin, Kazimianec, Arina, Borghetto, Andrea, Wright, Thomas G., Woodward, Gary, Hassanali, Neelam, Nicholls, Rowan C., Simpson, Hayley, Waddell, Tom, Vikal, Siddarth, Mavar, Marija, Rymell, Soubera, Wigley, Ioan, Jacobs, Jaco, Kelly, Matt, Banerjee, Rajarshi, Brady, J. Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32147892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27113
_version_ 1783583212100911104
author Goldfinger, Marc H.
Ridgway, Gerard R.
Ferreira, Carlos
Langford, Caitlin R.
Cheng, Lin
Kazimianec, Arina
Borghetto, Andrea
Wright, Thomas G.
Woodward, Gary
Hassanali, Neelam
Nicholls, Rowan C.
Simpson, Hayley
Waddell, Tom
Vikal, Siddarth
Mavar, Marija
Rymell, Soubera
Wigley, Ioan
Jacobs, Jaco
Kelly, Matt
Banerjee, Rajarshi
Brady, J. Michael
author_facet Goldfinger, Marc H.
Ridgway, Gerard R.
Ferreira, Carlos
Langford, Caitlin R.
Cheng, Lin
Kazimianec, Arina
Borghetto, Andrea
Wright, Thomas G.
Woodward, Gary
Hassanali, Neelam
Nicholls, Rowan C.
Simpson, Hayley
Waddell, Tom
Vikal, Siddarth
Mavar, Marija
Rymell, Soubera
Wigley, Ioan
Jacobs, Jaco
Kelly, Matt
Banerjee, Rajarshi
Brady, J. Michael
author_sort Goldfinger, Marc H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is an important tool for noninvasive imaging of biliary disease, however, its assessment is currently subjective, resulting in the need for objective biomarkers. PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy, scan/rescan repeatability, and cross‐scanner reproducibility of a novel quantitative MRCP tool on phantoms and in vivo. Additionally, to report normative ranges derived from the healthy cohort for duct measurements and tree‐level summary metrics. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. PHANTOMS/SUBJECTS: Phantoms: two bespoke designs, one with varying tube‐width, curvature, and orientation, and one exhibiting a complex structure based on a real biliary tree. Subjects Twenty healthy volunteers, 10 patients with biliary disease, and 10 with nonbiliary liver disease. SEQUENCE/FIELD STRENGTH: MRCP data were acquired using heavily T(2)‐weighted 3D multishot fast/turbo spin echo acquisitions at 1.5T and 3T. ASSESSMENT: Digital instances of the phantoms were synthesized with varying resolution and signal‐to‐noise ratio. Physical 3D‐printed phantoms were scanned across six scanners (two field strengths for each of three manufacturers). Human subjects were imaged on four scanners (two fieldstrengths for each of two manufacturers). STATISTICAL TESTS: Bland–Altman analysis and repeatability coefficient (RC). RESULTS: Accuracy of the diameter measurement approximated the scanning resolution, with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) from –1.1 to 1.0 mm. Excellent phantom repeatability was observed, with LoA from –0.4 to 0.4 mm. Good reproducibility was observed across the six scanners for both phantoms, with a range of LoA from –1.1 to 0.5 mm. Inter‐ and intraobserver agreement was high. Quantitative MRCP detected strictures and dilatations in the phantom with 76.6% and 85.9% sensitivity and 100% specificity in both. Patients and healthy volunteers exhibited significant differences in metrics including common bile duct (CBD) maximum diameter (7.6 mm vs. 5.2 mm P = 0.002), and overall biliary tree volume 12.36 mL vs. 4.61 mL, P = 0.0026). DATA CONCLUSION: The results indicate that quantitative MRCP provides accurate, repeatable, and reproducible measurements capable of objectively assessing cholangiopathic change. Evidence Level: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:807–820.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7496952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74969522020-09-25 Quantitative MRCP Imaging: Accuracy, Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Cohort‐Derived Normative Ranges Goldfinger, Marc H. Ridgway, Gerard R. Ferreira, Carlos Langford, Caitlin R. Cheng, Lin Kazimianec, Arina Borghetto, Andrea Wright, Thomas G. Woodward, Gary Hassanali, Neelam Nicholls, Rowan C. Simpson, Hayley Waddell, Tom Vikal, Siddarth Mavar, Marija Rymell, Soubera Wigley, Ioan Jacobs, Jaco Kelly, Matt Banerjee, Rajarshi Brady, J. Michael J Magn Reson Imaging Original Research BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is an important tool for noninvasive imaging of biliary disease, however, its assessment is currently subjective, resulting in the need for objective biomarkers. PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy, scan/rescan repeatability, and cross‐scanner reproducibility of a novel quantitative MRCP tool on phantoms and in vivo. Additionally, to report normative ranges derived from the healthy cohort for duct measurements and tree‐level summary metrics. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. PHANTOMS/SUBJECTS: Phantoms: two bespoke designs, one with varying tube‐width, curvature, and orientation, and one exhibiting a complex structure based on a real biliary tree. Subjects Twenty healthy volunteers, 10 patients with biliary disease, and 10 with nonbiliary liver disease. SEQUENCE/FIELD STRENGTH: MRCP data were acquired using heavily T(2)‐weighted 3D multishot fast/turbo spin echo acquisitions at 1.5T and 3T. ASSESSMENT: Digital instances of the phantoms were synthesized with varying resolution and signal‐to‐noise ratio. Physical 3D‐printed phantoms were scanned across six scanners (two field strengths for each of three manufacturers). Human subjects were imaged on four scanners (two fieldstrengths for each of two manufacturers). STATISTICAL TESTS: Bland–Altman analysis and repeatability coefficient (RC). RESULTS: Accuracy of the diameter measurement approximated the scanning resolution, with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) from –1.1 to 1.0 mm. Excellent phantom repeatability was observed, with LoA from –0.4 to 0.4 mm. Good reproducibility was observed across the six scanners for both phantoms, with a range of LoA from –1.1 to 0.5 mm. Inter‐ and intraobserver agreement was high. Quantitative MRCP detected strictures and dilatations in the phantom with 76.6% and 85.9% sensitivity and 100% specificity in both. Patients and healthy volunteers exhibited significant differences in metrics including common bile duct (CBD) maximum diameter (7.6 mm vs. 5.2 mm P = 0.002), and overall biliary tree volume 12.36 mL vs. 4.61 mL, P = 0.0026). DATA CONCLUSION: The results indicate that quantitative MRCP provides accurate, repeatable, and reproducible measurements capable of objectively assessing cholangiopathic change. Evidence Level: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:807–820. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-03-08 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7496952/ /pubmed/32147892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27113 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Goldfinger, Marc H.
Ridgway, Gerard R.
Ferreira, Carlos
Langford, Caitlin R.
Cheng, Lin
Kazimianec, Arina
Borghetto, Andrea
Wright, Thomas G.
Woodward, Gary
Hassanali, Neelam
Nicholls, Rowan C.
Simpson, Hayley
Waddell, Tom
Vikal, Siddarth
Mavar, Marija
Rymell, Soubera
Wigley, Ioan
Jacobs, Jaco
Kelly, Matt
Banerjee, Rajarshi
Brady, J. Michael
Quantitative MRCP Imaging: Accuracy, Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Cohort‐Derived Normative Ranges
title Quantitative MRCP Imaging: Accuracy, Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Cohort‐Derived Normative Ranges
title_full Quantitative MRCP Imaging: Accuracy, Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Cohort‐Derived Normative Ranges
title_fullStr Quantitative MRCP Imaging: Accuracy, Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Cohort‐Derived Normative Ranges
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative MRCP Imaging: Accuracy, Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Cohort‐Derived Normative Ranges
title_short Quantitative MRCP Imaging: Accuracy, Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Cohort‐Derived Normative Ranges
title_sort quantitative mrcp imaging: accuracy, repeatability, reproducibility, and cohort‐derived normative ranges
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32147892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27113
work_keys_str_mv AT goldfingermarch quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges
AT ridgwaygerardr quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges
AT ferreiracarlos quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges
AT langfordcaitlinr quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges
AT chenglin quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges
AT kazimianecarina quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges
AT borghettoandrea quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges
AT wrightthomasg quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges
AT woodwardgary quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges
AT hassanalineelam quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges
AT nichollsrowanc quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges
AT simpsonhayley quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges
AT waddelltom quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges
AT vikalsiddarth quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges
AT mavarmarija quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges
AT rymellsoubera quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges
AT wigleyioan quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges
AT jacobsjaco quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges
AT kellymatt quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges
AT banerjeerajarshi quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges
AT bradyjmichael quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges