Cargando…
Quantitative MRCP Imaging: Accuracy, Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Cohort‐Derived Normative Ranges
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is an important tool for noninvasive imaging of biliary disease, however, its assessment is currently subjective, resulting in the need for objective biomarkers. PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy, scan/rescan repeatability, and cross‐...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32147892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27113 |
_version_ | 1783583212100911104 |
---|---|
author | Goldfinger, Marc H. Ridgway, Gerard R. Ferreira, Carlos Langford, Caitlin R. Cheng, Lin Kazimianec, Arina Borghetto, Andrea Wright, Thomas G. Woodward, Gary Hassanali, Neelam Nicholls, Rowan C. Simpson, Hayley Waddell, Tom Vikal, Siddarth Mavar, Marija Rymell, Soubera Wigley, Ioan Jacobs, Jaco Kelly, Matt Banerjee, Rajarshi Brady, J. Michael |
author_facet | Goldfinger, Marc H. Ridgway, Gerard R. Ferreira, Carlos Langford, Caitlin R. Cheng, Lin Kazimianec, Arina Borghetto, Andrea Wright, Thomas G. Woodward, Gary Hassanali, Neelam Nicholls, Rowan C. Simpson, Hayley Waddell, Tom Vikal, Siddarth Mavar, Marija Rymell, Soubera Wigley, Ioan Jacobs, Jaco Kelly, Matt Banerjee, Rajarshi Brady, J. Michael |
author_sort | Goldfinger, Marc H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is an important tool for noninvasive imaging of biliary disease, however, its assessment is currently subjective, resulting in the need for objective biomarkers. PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy, scan/rescan repeatability, and cross‐scanner reproducibility of a novel quantitative MRCP tool on phantoms and in vivo. Additionally, to report normative ranges derived from the healthy cohort for duct measurements and tree‐level summary metrics. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. PHANTOMS/SUBJECTS: Phantoms: two bespoke designs, one with varying tube‐width, curvature, and orientation, and one exhibiting a complex structure based on a real biliary tree. Subjects Twenty healthy volunteers, 10 patients with biliary disease, and 10 with nonbiliary liver disease. SEQUENCE/FIELD STRENGTH: MRCP data were acquired using heavily T(2)‐weighted 3D multishot fast/turbo spin echo acquisitions at 1.5T and 3T. ASSESSMENT: Digital instances of the phantoms were synthesized with varying resolution and signal‐to‐noise ratio. Physical 3D‐printed phantoms were scanned across six scanners (two field strengths for each of three manufacturers). Human subjects were imaged on four scanners (two fieldstrengths for each of two manufacturers). STATISTICAL TESTS: Bland–Altman analysis and repeatability coefficient (RC). RESULTS: Accuracy of the diameter measurement approximated the scanning resolution, with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) from –1.1 to 1.0 mm. Excellent phantom repeatability was observed, with LoA from –0.4 to 0.4 mm. Good reproducibility was observed across the six scanners for both phantoms, with a range of LoA from –1.1 to 0.5 mm. Inter‐ and intraobserver agreement was high. Quantitative MRCP detected strictures and dilatations in the phantom with 76.6% and 85.9% sensitivity and 100% specificity in both. Patients and healthy volunteers exhibited significant differences in metrics including common bile duct (CBD) maximum diameter (7.6 mm vs. 5.2 mm P = 0.002), and overall biliary tree volume 12.36 mL vs. 4.61 mL, P = 0.0026). DATA CONCLUSION: The results indicate that quantitative MRCP provides accurate, repeatable, and reproducible measurements capable of objectively assessing cholangiopathic change. Evidence Level: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:807–820. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7496952 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74969522020-09-25 Quantitative MRCP Imaging: Accuracy, Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Cohort‐Derived Normative Ranges Goldfinger, Marc H. Ridgway, Gerard R. Ferreira, Carlos Langford, Caitlin R. Cheng, Lin Kazimianec, Arina Borghetto, Andrea Wright, Thomas G. Woodward, Gary Hassanali, Neelam Nicholls, Rowan C. Simpson, Hayley Waddell, Tom Vikal, Siddarth Mavar, Marija Rymell, Soubera Wigley, Ioan Jacobs, Jaco Kelly, Matt Banerjee, Rajarshi Brady, J. Michael J Magn Reson Imaging Original Research BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is an important tool for noninvasive imaging of biliary disease, however, its assessment is currently subjective, resulting in the need for objective biomarkers. PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy, scan/rescan repeatability, and cross‐scanner reproducibility of a novel quantitative MRCP tool on phantoms and in vivo. Additionally, to report normative ranges derived from the healthy cohort for duct measurements and tree‐level summary metrics. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. PHANTOMS/SUBJECTS: Phantoms: two bespoke designs, one with varying tube‐width, curvature, and orientation, and one exhibiting a complex structure based on a real biliary tree. Subjects Twenty healthy volunteers, 10 patients with biliary disease, and 10 with nonbiliary liver disease. SEQUENCE/FIELD STRENGTH: MRCP data were acquired using heavily T(2)‐weighted 3D multishot fast/turbo spin echo acquisitions at 1.5T and 3T. ASSESSMENT: Digital instances of the phantoms were synthesized with varying resolution and signal‐to‐noise ratio. Physical 3D‐printed phantoms were scanned across six scanners (two field strengths for each of three manufacturers). Human subjects were imaged on four scanners (two fieldstrengths for each of two manufacturers). STATISTICAL TESTS: Bland–Altman analysis and repeatability coefficient (RC). RESULTS: Accuracy of the diameter measurement approximated the scanning resolution, with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) from –1.1 to 1.0 mm. Excellent phantom repeatability was observed, with LoA from –0.4 to 0.4 mm. Good reproducibility was observed across the six scanners for both phantoms, with a range of LoA from –1.1 to 0.5 mm. Inter‐ and intraobserver agreement was high. Quantitative MRCP detected strictures and dilatations in the phantom with 76.6% and 85.9% sensitivity and 100% specificity in both. Patients and healthy volunteers exhibited significant differences in metrics including common bile duct (CBD) maximum diameter (7.6 mm vs. 5.2 mm P = 0.002), and overall biliary tree volume 12.36 mL vs. 4.61 mL, P = 0.0026). DATA CONCLUSION: The results indicate that quantitative MRCP provides accurate, repeatable, and reproducible measurements capable of objectively assessing cholangiopathic change. Evidence Level: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:807–820. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-03-08 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7496952/ /pubmed/32147892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27113 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Goldfinger, Marc H. Ridgway, Gerard R. Ferreira, Carlos Langford, Caitlin R. Cheng, Lin Kazimianec, Arina Borghetto, Andrea Wright, Thomas G. Woodward, Gary Hassanali, Neelam Nicholls, Rowan C. Simpson, Hayley Waddell, Tom Vikal, Siddarth Mavar, Marija Rymell, Soubera Wigley, Ioan Jacobs, Jaco Kelly, Matt Banerjee, Rajarshi Brady, J. Michael Quantitative MRCP Imaging: Accuracy, Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Cohort‐Derived Normative Ranges |
title | Quantitative MRCP Imaging: Accuracy, Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Cohort‐Derived Normative Ranges |
title_full | Quantitative MRCP Imaging: Accuracy, Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Cohort‐Derived Normative Ranges |
title_fullStr | Quantitative MRCP Imaging: Accuracy, Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Cohort‐Derived Normative Ranges |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative MRCP Imaging: Accuracy, Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Cohort‐Derived Normative Ranges |
title_short | Quantitative MRCP Imaging: Accuracy, Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Cohort‐Derived Normative Ranges |
title_sort | quantitative mrcp imaging: accuracy, repeatability, reproducibility, and cohort‐derived normative ranges |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7496952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32147892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27113 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goldfingermarch quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges AT ridgwaygerardr quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges AT ferreiracarlos quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges AT langfordcaitlinr quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges AT chenglin quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges AT kazimianecarina quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges AT borghettoandrea quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges AT wrightthomasg quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges AT woodwardgary quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges AT hassanalineelam quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges AT nichollsrowanc quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges AT simpsonhayley quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges AT waddelltom quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges AT vikalsiddarth quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges AT mavarmarija quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges AT rymellsoubera quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges AT wigleyioan quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges AT jacobsjaco quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges AT kellymatt quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges AT banerjeerajarshi quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges AT bradyjmichael quantitativemrcpimagingaccuracyrepeatabilityreproducibilityandcohortderivednormativeranges |