Cargando…

Placebo effect in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: The PATH study and a systematic review

The Polyneuropathy And Treatment with Hizentra (PATH) study required subjects with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) to show dependency on immunoglobulin G (IgG) and then be restabilized on IgG before being randomized to placebo or one of two doses of subcutaneous immunoglobul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lewis, Richard A., Cornblath, David R., Hartung, Hans‐Peter, Sobue, Gens, Lawo, John‐Philip, Mielke, Orell, Durn, Billie L., Bril, Vera, Merkies, Ingemar S. J., Bassett, Paul, Cleasby, Alexa, van Schaik, Ivo N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32627277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jns.12402
_version_ 1783583226937212928
author Lewis, Richard A.
Cornblath, David R.
Hartung, Hans‐Peter
Sobue, Gens
Lawo, John‐Philip
Mielke, Orell
Durn, Billie L.
Bril, Vera
Merkies, Ingemar S. J.
Bassett, Paul
Cleasby, Alexa
van Schaik, Ivo N.
author_facet Lewis, Richard A.
Cornblath, David R.
Hartung, Hans‐Peter
Sobue, Gens
Lawo, John‐Philip
Mielke, Orell
Durn, Billie L.
Bril, Vera
Merkies, Ingemar S. J.
Bassett, Paul
Cleasby, Alexa
van Schaik, Ivo N.
author_sort Lewis, Richard A.
collection PubMed
description The Polyneuropathy And Treatment with Hizentra (PATH) study required subjects with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) to show dependency on immunoglobulin G (IgG) and then be restabilized on IgG before being randomized to placebo or one of two doses of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG). Nineteen of the 51 subjects (37%) randomized to placebo did not relapse over the next 24 weeks. This article explores the reasons for this effect. A post‐hoc analysis of the PATH placebo group was undertaken. A literature search identified other placebo‐controlled CIDP trials for review and comparison. In PATH, subjects randomized to placebo who did not relapse were significantly older, had more severe disease, and took longer to deteriorate in the IgG dependency period compared with those who relapsed. Published trials in CIDP, whose primary endpoint was stability or deterioration, had a mean non‐deterioration (placebo effect) of 43%, while trials with a primary endpoint of improvement had a placebo response of only 11%. Placebo is an important variable in the design of CIDP trials. Trials designed to show clinical improvement will have a significantly lower effect of this phenomenon than those designed to show stability or deterioration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7497019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74970192020-09-25 Placebo effect in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: The PATH study and a systematic review Lewis, Richard A. Cornblath, David R. Hartung, Hans‐Peter Sobue, Gens Lawo, John‐Philip Mielke, Orell Durn, Billie L. Bril, Vera Merkies, Ingemar S. J. Bassett, Paul Cleasby, Alexa van Schaik, Ivo N. J Peripher Nerv Syst Research Reports The Polyneuropathy And Treatment with Hizentra (PATH) study required subjects with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) to show dependency on immunoglobulin G (IgG) and then be restabilized on IgG before being randomized to placebo or one of two doses of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG). Nineteen of the 51 subjects (37%) randomized to placebo did not relapse over the next 24 weeks. This article explores the reasons for this effect. A post‐hoc analysis of the PATH placebo group was undertaken. A literature search identified other placebo‐controlled CIDP trials for review and comparison. In PATH, subjects randomized to placebo who did not relapse were significantly older, had more severe disease, and took longer to deteriorate in the IgG dependency period compared with those who relapsed. Published trials in CIDP, whose primary endpoint was stability or deterioration, had a mean non‐deterioration (placebo effect) of 43%, while trials with a primary endpoint of improvement had a placebo response of only 11%. Placebo is an important variable in the design of CIDP trials. Trials designed to show clinical improvement will have a significantly lower effect of this phenomenon than those designed to show stability or deterioration. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2020-08-05 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7497019/ /pubmed/32627277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jns.12402 Text en © 2020 CSL Behring. Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Peripheral Nerve Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Reports
Lewis, Richard A.
Cornblath, David R.
Hartung, Hans‐Peter
Sobue, Gens
Lawo, John‐Philip
Mielke, Orell
Durn, Billie L.
Bril, Vera
Merkies, Ingemar S. J.
Bassett, Paul
Cleasby, Alexa
van Schaik, Ivo N.
Placebo effect in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: The PATH study and a systematic review
title Placebo effect in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: The PATH study and a systematic review
title_full Placebo effect in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: The PATH study and a systematic review
title_fullStr Placebo effect in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: The PATH study and a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Placebo effect in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: The PATH study and a systematic review
title_short Placebo effect in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: The PATH study and a systematic review
title_sort placebo effect in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: the path study and a systematic review
topic Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32627277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jns.12402
work_keys_str_mv AT lewisricharda placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview
AT cornblathdavidr placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview
AT hartunghanspeter placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview
AT sobuegens placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview
AT lawojohnphilip placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview
AT mielkeorell placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview
AT durnbilliel placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview
AT brilvera placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview
AT merkiesingemarsj placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview
AT bassettpaul placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview
AT cleasbyalexa placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview
AT vanschaikivon placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview
AT placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview