Cargando…
Placebo effect in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: The PATH study and a systematic review
The Polyneuropathy And Treatment with Hizentra (PATH) study required subjects with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) to show dependency on immunoglobulin G (IgG) and then be restabilized on IgG before being randomized to placebo or one of two doses of subcutaneous immunoglobul...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32627277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jns.12402 |
_version_ | 1783583226937212928 |
---|---|
author | Lewis, Richard A. Cornblath, David R. Hartung, Hans‐Peter Sobue, Gens Lawo, John‐Philip Mielke, Orell Durn, Billie L. Bril, Vera Merkies, Ingemar S. J. Bassett, Paul Cleasby, Alexa van Schaik, Ivo N. |
author_facet | Lewis, Richard A. Cornblath, David R. Hartung, Hans‐Peter Sobue, Gens Lawo, John‐Philip Mielke, Orell Durn, Billie L. Bril, Vera Merkies, Ingemar S. J. Bassett, Paul Cleasby, Alexa van Schaik, Ivo N. |
author_sort | Lewis, Richard A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Polyneuropathy And Treatment with Hizentra (PATH) study required subjects with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) to show dependency on immunoglobulin G (IgG) and then be restabilized on IgG before being randomized to placebo or one of two doses of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG). Nineteen of the 51 subjects (37%) randomized to placebo did not relapse over the next 24 weeks. This article explores the reasons for this effect. A post‐hoc analysis of the PATH placebo group was undertaken. A literature search identified other placebo‐controlled CIDP trials for review and comparison. In PATH, subjects randomized to placebo who did not relapse were significantly older, had more severe disease, and took longer to deteriorate in the IgG dependency period compared with those who relapsed. Published trials in CIDP, whose primary endpoint was stability or deterioration, had a mean non‐deterioration (placebo effect) of 43%, while trials with a primary endpoint of improvement had a placebo response of only 11%. Placebo is an important variable in the design of CIDP trials. Trials designed to show clinical improvement will have a significantly lower effect of this phenomenon than those designed to show stability or deterioration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7497019 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74970192020-09-25 Placebo effect in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: The PATH study and a systematic review Lewis, Richard A. Cornblath, David R. Hartung, Hans‐Peter Sobue, Gens Lawo, John‐Philip Mielke, Orell Durn, Billie L. Bril, Vera Merkies, Ingemar S. J. Bassett, Paul Cleasby, Alexa van Schaik, Ivo N. J Peripher Nerv Syst Research Reports The Polyneuropathy And Treatment with Hizentra (PATH) study required subjects with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) to show dependency on immunoglobulin G (IgG) and then be restabilized on IgG before being randomized to placebo or one of two doses of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG). Nineteen of the 51 subjects (37%) randomized to placebo did not relapse over the next 24 weeks. This article explores the reasons for this effect. A post‐hoc analysis of the PATH placebo group was undertaken. A literature search identified other placebo‐controlled CIDP trials for review and comparison. In PATH, subjects randomized to placebo who did not relapse were significantly older, had more severe disease, and took longer to deteriorate in the IgG dependency period compared with those who relapsed. Published trials in CIDP, whose primary endpoint was stability or deterioration, had a mean non‐deterioration (placebo effect) of 43%, while trials with a primary endpoint of improvement had a placebo response of only 11%. Placebo is an important variable in the design of CIDP trials. Trials designed to show clinical improvement will have a significantly lower effect of this phenomenon than those designed to show stability or deterioration. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2020-08-05 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7497019/ /pubmed/32627277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jns.12402 Text en © 2020 CSL Behring. Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Peripheral Nerve Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Reports Lewis, Richard A. Cornblath, David R. Hartung, Hans‐Peter Sobue, Gens Lawo, John‐Philip Mielke, Orell Durn, Billie L. Bril, Vera Merkies, Ingemar S. J. Bassett, Paul Cleasby, Alexa van Schaik, Ivo N. Placebo effect in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: The PATH study and a systematic review |
title | Placebo effect in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: The PATH study and a systematic review |
title_full | Placebo effect in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: The PATH study and a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Placebo effect in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: The PATH study and a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Placebo effect in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: The PATH study and a systematic review |
title_short | Placebo effect in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: The PATH study and a systematic review |
title_sort | placebo effect in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: the path study and a systematic review |
topic | Research Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32627277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jns.12402 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lewisricharda placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview AT cornblathdavidr placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview AT hartunghanspeter placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview AT sobuegens placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview AT lawojohnphilip placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview AT mielkeorell placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview AT durnbilliel placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview AT brilvera placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview AT merkiesingemarsj placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview AT bassettpaul placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview AT cleasbyalexa placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview AT vanschaikivon placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview AT placeboeffectinchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyneuropathythepathstudyandasystematicreview |