Cargando…

Patients' satisfaction and safety of bulk injection therapy Urolastic for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: A cross‐sectional study

AIMS: Primary outcome was to evaluate patients' satisfaction after being treated with bulk injection therapy polydimethylsiloxane Urolastic (PDMS‐U) for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Secondary outcomes were: subjective cure, objective cure, severity of SUI symptoms, complications, reinterv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Casteleijn, Fenne M., Kowalik, Claudia R., Berends, Claudia, Blaganje, Mija, Lasić Pecev, Mateja, van der Linden, Ellen, Zwolsman, Sandra E., Roovers, Jan‐Paul W. R., Minnee, Pieter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32526063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.24417
_version_ 1783583230846304256
author Casteleijn, Fenne M.
Kowalik, Claudia R.
Berends, Claudia
Blaganje, Mija
Lasić Pecev, Mateja
van der Linden, Ellen
Zwolsman, Sandra E.
Roovers, Jan‐Paul W. R.
Minnee, Pieter
author_facet Casteleijn, Fenne M.
Kowalik, Claudia R.
Berends, Claudia
Blaganje, Mija
Lasić Pecev, Mateja
van der Linden, Ellen
Zwolsman, Sandra E.
Roovers, Jan‐Paul W. R.
Minnee, Pieter
author_sort Casteleijn, Fenne M.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Primary outcome was to evaluate patients' satisfaction after being treated with bulk injection therapy polydimethylsiloxane Urolastic (PDMS‐U) for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Secondary outcomes were: subjective cure, objective cure, severity of SUI symptoms, complications, reintervention rate, and disease‐specific quality of life. Furthermore, to determine if outcomes worsened during time‐after‐treatment (time‐frames: 0‐12, 13‐24, and ≥25 months). METHODS: In a cross‐sectional design, patients treated with PDMS‐U were recruited for hospital revisit. The primary outcome, patients' satisfaction, was assessed by the surgical satisfaction questionnaire. Subjective cure, objective cure, and severity of symptoms were assessed by the patients global impression of improvement, standardized cough stress test, and Sandvik severity scale, respectively. Medical charts and face‐to‐face interviews were used to determine complications and reinterventions. RESULTS: About 110 patients participated, 87 revisited the hospital. Median follow‐up was 25 months (interquartile range: 14;35 months). Patients' satisfaction rate was 51%. Subjective and objective cure were respectively 46% and 47%. Most prevalent complications were: urinary retention (22%), pain (15%), and dyspareunia (15%). Exposure and erosion occurred in 7% and 5%, respectively. Reintervention rate of reinjection and excision of bulk material was 6% and 18.0%, respectively. Objective cure significantly worsened during time‐after‐treatment (P = < .05). CONCLUSIONS: About half of the patients being treated with PDMS‐U were satisfied and subjectively cured 2 years after treatment, although the majority still experienced symptoms of SUI. Most complications were mild and transient, however, in 18% excision of bulk material was indicated for severe or persistent complications such as pain, exposure, or erosion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7497040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74970402020-09-25 Patients' satisfaction and safety of bulk injection therapy Urolastic for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: A cross‐sectional study Casteleijn, Fenne M. Kowalik, Claudia R. Berends, Claudia Blaganje, Mija Lasić Pecev, Mateja van der Linden, Ellen Zwolsman, Sandra E. Roovers, Jan‐Paul W. R. Minnee, Pieter Neurourol Urodyn Original Clinical Articles AIMS: Primary outcome was to evaluate patients' satisfaction after being treated with bulk injection therapy polydimethylsiloxane Urolastic (PDMS‐U) for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Secondary outcomes were: subjective cure, objective cure, severity of SUI symptoms, complications, reintervention rate, and disease‐specific quality of life. Furthermore, to determine if outcomes worsened during time‐after‐treatment (time‐frames: 0‐12, 13‐24, and ≥25 months). METHODS: In a cross‐sectional design, patients treated with PDMS‐U were recruited for hospital revisit. The primary outcome, patients' satisfaction, was assessed by the surgical satisfaction questionnaire. Subjective cure, objective cure, and severity of symptoms were assessed by the patients global impression of improvement, standardized cough stress test, and Sandvik severity scale, respectively. Medical charts and face‐to‐face interviews were used to determine complications and reinterventions. RESULTS: About 110 patients participated, 87 revisited the hospital. Median follow‐up was 25 months (interquartile range: 14;35 months). Patients' satisfaction rate was 51%. Subjective and objective cure were respectively 46% and 47%. Most prevalent complications were: urinary retention (22%), pain (15%), and dyspareunia (15%). Exposure and erosion occurred in 7% and 5%, respectively. Reintervention rate of reinjection and excision of bulk material was 6% and 18.0%, respectively. Objective cure significantly worsened during time‐after‐treatment (P = < .05). CONCLUSIONS: About half of the patients being treated with PDMS‐U were satisfied and subjectively cured 2 years after treatment, although the majority still experienced symptoms of SUI. Most complications were mild and transient, however, in 18% excision of bulk material was indicated for severe or persistent complications such as pain, exposure, or erosion. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-11 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7497040/ /pubmed/32526063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.24417 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Neurourology and Urodynamics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Clinical Articles
Casteleijn, Fenne M.
Kowalik, Claudia R.
Berends, Claudia
Blaganje, Mija
Lasić Pecev, Mateja
van der Linden, Ellen
Zwolsman, Sandra E.
Roovers, Jan‐Paul W. R.
Minnee, Pieter
Patients' satisfaction and safety of bulk injection therapy Urolastic for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: A cross‐sectional study
title Patients' satisfaction and safety of bulk injection therapy Urolastic for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: A cross‐sectional study
title_full Patients' satisfaction and safety of bulk injection therapy Urolastic for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: A cross‐sectional study
title_fullStr Patients' satisfaction and safety of bulk injection therapy Urolastic for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: A cross‐sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Patients' satisfaction and safety of bulk injection therapy Urolastic for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: A cross‐sectional study
title_short Patients' satisfaction and safety of bulk injection therapy Urolastic for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: A cross‐sectional study
title_sort patients' satisfaction and safety of bulk injection therapy urolastic for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a cross‐sectional study
topic Original Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32526063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.24417
work_keys_str_mv AT casteleijnfennem patientssatisfactionandsafetyofbulkinjectiontherapyurolasticfortreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceacrosssectionalstudy
AT kowalikclaudiar patientssatisfactionandsafetyofbulkinjectiontherapyurolasticfortreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceacrosssectionalstudy
AT berendsclaudia patientssatisfactionandsafetyofbulkinjectiontherapyurolasticfortreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceacrosssectionalstudy
AT blaganjemija patientssatisfactionandsafetyofbulkinjectiontherapyurolasticfortreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceacrosssectionalstudy
AT lasicpecevmateja patientssatisfactionandsafetyofbulkinjectiontherapyurolasticfortreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceacrosssectionalstudy
AT vanderlindenellen patientssatisfactionandsafetyofbulkinjectiontherapyurolasticfortreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceacrosssectionalstudy
AT zwolsmansandrae patientssatisfactionandsafetyofbulkinjectiontherapyurolasticfortreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceacrosssectionalstudy
AT rooversjanpaulwr patientssatisfactionandsafetyofbulkinjectiontherapyurolasticfortreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceacrosssectionalstudy
AT minneepieter patientssatisfactionandsafetyofbulkinjectiontherapyurolasticfortreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceacrosssectionalstudy