Sodium–glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitor cardiovascular outcome trials and generalizability to English primary care

AIM: To identify people in English primary care with equivalent cardiovascular risk to participants in the sodium–glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitor (SGLT‐2i) cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs). A secondary objective was to report the usage of SGLT‐2is. METHODS: Cross‐sectional analysis of people registered with participating practices in the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC) network on the 31 December 2016. We derived: (1) proportions of the primary care population eligible for inclusion in each SGLT‐2i CVOT (CANVAS, DECLARE, EMPA‐REG and VERTIS); (2) characteristics of the eligible population compared with trial participants (demographics, disease duration and vascular risk); and (3) differences within the eligible population prescribed SGLT‐2is. RESULTS: The proportions of people with type 2 diabetes (N = 84 394) meeting the inclusion criteria for each CVOT were: DECLARE 27% [95% confidence interval (CI) 26.5–27.1]; CANVAS 17% (16.6–17.1); VERTIS 7% (7.1–7.4); and EMPA‐REG 7% (6.5–6.8). Primary care populations fulfilling inclusion criteria were 5–8 years older than trial cohorts, and <10% with inclusion criteria of each trial were prescribed an SGLT‐2i; a greater proportion were men, and of white ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: There was variation in proportions of the primary care type 2 diabetes population fulfilling inclusion criteria of SGLT‐2i CVOTs. The more stringent the inclusion criteria, the lower the proportion identified in a primary care setting. Prescription rates for SGLT‐2is were low in this national database, and there were demographic disparities in prescribing.