Cargando…

Reliability of the mixing ability test testing masticatory performance in patients with head and neck cancer and healthy controls

BACKGROUND: Treatment of patients with head and neck cancer can result in disrupted mastication. To measure masticatory performance in people with compromised mastication, the mixing ability test (MAT) was developed. OBJECTIVE: In this study, the reliability of the MAT was evaluated in patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vermaire, Jorine A., Weinberg, Florine M., Raaijmakers, Cornelis P. J., Verdonck‐de Leeuw, Irma M., Terhaard, Chris H. J., Speksnijder, Caroline M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32495364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.13029
_version_ 1783583242682630144
author Vermaire, Jorine A.
Weinberg, Florine M.
Raaijmakers, Cornelis P. J.
Verdonck‐de Leeuw, Irma M.
Terhaard, Chris H. J.
Speksnijder, Caroline M.
author_facet Vermaire, Jorine A.
Weinberg, Florine M.
Raaijmakers, Cornelis P. J.
Verdonck‐de Leeuw, Irma M.
Terhaard, Chris H. J.
Speksnijder, Caroline M.
author_sort Vermaire, Jorine A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Treatment of patients with head and neck cancer can result in disrupted mastication. To measure masticatory performance in people with compromised mastication, the mixing ability test (MAT) was developed. OBJECTIVE: In this study, the reliability of the MAT was evaluated in patients with head and neck cancer and healthy controls. METHODS: Thirty‐four patients with head and neck cancer and 42 healthy controls performed the MAT twice on the same day. To assess reliability, the intra‐class correlation coefficient (ICC(2,1)), standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable change (SDC) and limits of agreement (LoA) were calculated. RESULTS: A good (ICC = 0.886) and moderate correlation (ICC = 0.525) were found for patients and healthy controls, respectively. Patients had a worse mixing ability (mean = 19.12, SD = 4.56) in comparison with healthy controls (mean = 16.42, SD = 2.04). The SEM was 0.76 in patients and 1.45 in healthy controls, with a SDC of 2.12 and 4.02, respectively. The LoA was −4.46 to 4.42 in patients and −3.65 to 4.59 in healthy controls. CONCLUSION: The MAT has a good reliability in patients with head and neck cancer and a moderate reliability in healthy controls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7497093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74970932020-09-25 Reliability of the mixing ability test testing masticatory performance in patients with head and neck cancer and healthy controls Vermaire, Jorine A. Weinberg, Florine M. Raaijmakers, Cornelis P. J. Verdonck‐de Leeuw, Irma M. Terhaard, Chris H. J. Speksnijder, Caroline M. J Oral Rehabil Original Articles BACKGROUND: Treatment of patients with head and neck cancer can result in disrupted mastication. To measure masticatory performance in people with compromised mastication, the mixing ability test (MAT) was developed. OBJECTIVE: In this study, the reliability of the MAT was evaluated in patients with head and neck cancer and healthy controls. METHODS: Thirty‐four patients with head and neck cancer and 42 healthy controls performed the MAT twice on the same day. To assess reliability, the intra‐class correlation coefficient (ICC(2,1)), standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable change (SDC) and limits of agreement (LoA) were calculated. RESULTS: A good (ICC = 0.886) and moderate correlation (ICC = 0.525) were found for patients and healthy controls, respectively. Patients had a worse mixing ability (mean = 19.12, SD = 4.56) in comparison with healthy controls (mean = 16.42, SD = 2.04). The SEM was 0.76 in patients and 1.45 in healthy controls, with a SDC of 2.12 and 4.02, respectively. The LoA was −4.46 to 4.42 in patients and −3.65 to 4.59 in healthy controls. CONCLUSION: The MAT has a good reliability in patients with head and neck cancer and a moderate reliability in healthy controls. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-20 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7497093/ /pubmed/32495364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.13029 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Vermaire, Jorine A.
Weinberg, Florine M.
Raaijmakers, Cornelis P. J.
Verdonck‐de Leeuw, Irma M.
Terhaard, Chris H. J.
Speksnijder, Caroline M.
Reliability of the mixing ability test testing masticatory performance in patients with head and neck cancer and healthy controls
title Reliability of the mixing ability test testing masticatory performance in patients with head and neck cancer and healthy controls
title_full Reliability of the mixing ability test testing masticatory performance in patients with head and neck cancer and healthy controls
title_fullStr Reliability of the mixing ability test testing masticatory performance in patients with head and neck cancer and healthy controls
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of the mixing ability test testing masticatory performance in patients with head and neck cancer and healthy controls
title_short Reliability of the mixing ability test testing masticatory performance in patients with head and neck cancer and healthy controls
title_sort reliability of the mixing ability test testing masticatory performance in patients with head and neck cancer and healthy controls
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32495364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.13029
work_keys_str_mv AT vermairejorinea reliabilityofthemixingabilitytesttestingmasticatoryperformanceinpatientswithheadandneckcancerandhealthycontrols
AT weinbergflorinem reliabilityofthemixingabilitytesttestingmasticatoryperformanceinpatientswithheadandneckcancerandhealthycontrols
AT raaijmakerscornelispj reliabilityofthemixingabilitytesttestingmasticatoryperformanceinpatientswithheadandneckcancerandhealthycontrols
AT verdonckdeleeuwirmam reliabilityofthemixingabilitytesttestingmasticatoryperformanceinpatientswithheadandneckcancerandhealthycontrols
AT terhaardchrishj reliabilityofthemixingabilitytesttestingmasticatoryperformanceinpatientswithheadandneckcancerandhealthycontrols
AT speksnijdercarolinem reliabilityofthemixingabilitytesttestingmasticatoryperformanceinpatientswithheadandneckcancerandhealthycontrols