Cargando…
The Kok effect revisited
The Kok effect refers to the abrupt decrease around the light compensation point in the slope of net photosynthetic rate vs irradiance. Arguably, this switch arises from light inhibition of respiration, allowing the Kok method to estimate day respiration (R (d)). Recent analysis suggests that increa...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32369617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16638 |
_version_ | 1783583250120179712 |
---|---|
author | Yin, Xinyou Niu, Yuxi van der Putten, Peter E. L. Struik, Paul C. |
author_facet | Yin, Xinyou Niu, Yuxi van der Putten, Peter E. L. Struik, Paul C. |
author_sort | Yin, Xinyou |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Kok effect refers to the abrupt decrease around the light compensation point in the slope of net photosynthetic rate vs irradiance. Arguably, this switch arises from light inhibition of respiration, allowing the Kok method to estimate day respiration (R (d)). Recent analysis suggests that increasing proportions of photorespiration (quantified as Γ*/C (c), the ratio of CO(2) compensation point Γ* to chloroplast CO(2) concentration, C (c)) with irradiance explain much of the Kok effect. Also, the Kok method has been modified to account for the decrease in PSII photochemical efficiency (Φ(2)) with irradiance. Using a model that illustrates how varying R (d), Γ*/C (c), Φ(2) and proportions of alternative electron transport could engender the Kok effect, we quantified the contribution of these parameters to the Kok effect measured in sunflower across various O(2) and CO(2) concentrations and various temperatures. Overall, the decreasing Φ(2) with irradiance explained c. 12%, and the varying Γ*/C (c) explained c. 25%, of the Kok effect. Maximum real light inhibition of R (d) was much lower than the inhibition derived from the Kok method, but still increased with photorespiration. Photorespiration had a dual contribution to the Kok effect, one via the varying Γ*/C (c) and the other via its participation in light inhibition of R (d). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7497127 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74971272020-09-25 The Kok effect revisited Yin, Xinyou Niu, Yuxi van der Putten, Peter E. L. Struik, Paul C. New Phytol Research The Kok effect refers to the abrupt decrease around the light compensation point in the slope of net photosynthetic rate vs irradiance. Arguably, this switch arises from light inhibition of respiration, allowing the Kok method to estimate day respiration (R (d)). Recent analysis suggests that increasing proportions of photorespiration (quantified as Γ*/C (c), the ratio of CO(2) compensation point Γ* to chloroplast CO(2) concentration, C (c)) with irradiance explain much of the Kok effect. Also, the Kok method has been modified to account for the decrease in PSII photochemical efficiency (Φ(2)) with irradiance. Using a model that illustrates how varying R (d), Γ*/C (c), Φ(2) and proportions of alternative electron transport could engender the Kok effect, we quantified the contribution of these parameters to the Kok effect measured in sunflower across various O(2) and CO(2) concentrations and various temperatures. Overall, the decreasing Φ(2) with irradiance explained c. 12%, and the varying Γ*/C (c) explained c. 25%, of the Kok effect. Maximum real light inhibition of R (d) was much lower than the inhibition derived from the Kok method, but still increased with photorespiration. Photorespiration had a dual contribution to the Kok effect, one via the varying Γ*/C (c) and the other via its participation in light inhibition of R (d). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-03 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7497127/ /pubmed/32369617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16638 Text en © 2020 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2020 New Phytologist Trust This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Yin, Xinyou Niu, Yuxi van der Putten, Peter E. L. Struik, Paul C. The Kok effect revisited |
title | The Kok effect revisited |
title_full | The Kok effect revisited |
title_fullStr | The Kok effect revisited |
title_full_unstemmed | The Kok effect revisited |
title_short | The Kok effect revisited |
title_sort | kok effect revisited |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32369617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16638 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yinxinyou thekokeffectrevisited AT niuyuxi thekokeffectrevisited AT vanderputtenpeterel thekokeffectrevisited AT struikpaulc thekokeffectrevisited AT yinxinyou kokeffectrevisited AT niuyuxi kokeffectrevisited AT vanderputtenpeterel kokeffectrevisited AT struikpaulc kokeffectrevisited |