Cargando…

The Kok effect revisited

The Kok effect refers to the abrupt decrease around the light compensation point in the slope of net photosynthetic rate vs irradiance. Arguably, this switch arises from light inhibition of respiration, allowing the Kok method to estimate day respiration (R (d)). Recent analysis suggests that increa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yin, Xinyou, Niu, Yuxi, van der Putten, Peter E. L., Struik, Paul C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32369617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16638
_version_ 1783583250120179712
author Yin, Xinyou
Niu, Yuxi
van der Putten, Peter E. L.
Struik, Paul C.
author_facet Yin, Xinyou
Niu, Yuxi
van der Putten, Peter E. L.
Struik, Paul C.
author_sort Yin, Xinyou
collection PubMed
description The Kok effect refers to the abrupt decrease around the light compensation point in the slope of net photosynthetic rate vs irradiance. Arguably, this switch arises from light inhibition of respiration, allowing the Kok method to estimate day respiration (R (d)). Recent analysis suggests that increasing proportions of photorespiration (quantified as Γ*/C (c), the ratio of CO(2) compensation point Γ* to chloroplast CO(2) concentration, C (c)) with irradiance explain much of the Kok effect. Also, the Kok method has been modified to account for the decrease in PSII photochemical efficiency (Φ(2)) with irradiance. Using a model that illustrates how varying R (d), Γ*/C (c), Φ(2) and proportions of alternative electron transport could engender the Kok effect, we quantified the contribution of these parameters to the Kok effect measured in sunflower across various O(2) and CO(2) concentrations and various temperatures. Overall, the decreasing Φ(2) with irradiance explained c. 12%, and the varying Γ*/C (c) explained c. 25%, of the Kok effect. Maximum real light inhibition of R (d) was much lower than the inhibition derived from the Kok method, but still increased with photorespiration. Photorespiration had a dual contribution to the Kok effect, one via the varying Γ*/C (c) and the other via its participation in light inhibition of R (d).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7497127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74971272020-09-25 The Kok effect revisited Yin, Xinyou Niu, Yuxi van der Putten, Peter E. L. Struik, Paul C. New Phytol Research The Kok effect refers to the abrupt decrease around the light compensation point in the slope of net photosynthetic rate vs irradiance. Arguably, this switch arises from light inhibition of respiration, allowing the Kok method to estimate day respiration (R (d)). Recent analysis suggests that increasing proportions of photorespiration (quantified as Γ*/C (c), the ratio of CO(2) compensation point Γ* to chloroplast CO(2) concentration, C (c)) with irradiance explain much of the Kok effect. Also, the Kok method has been modified to account for the decrease in PSII photochemical efficiency (Φ(2)) with irradiance. Using a model that illustrates how varying R (d), Γ*/C (c), Φ(2) and proportions of alternative electron transport could engender the Kok effect, we quantified the contribution of these parameters to the Kok effect measured in sunflower across various O(2) and CO(2) concentrations and various temperatures. Overall, the decreasing Φ(2) with irradiance explained c. 12%, and the varying Γ*/C (c) explained c. 25%, of the Kok effect. Maximum real light inhibition of R (d) was much lower than the inhibition derived from the Kok method, but still increased with photorespiration. Photorespiration had a dual contribution to the Kok effect, one via the varying Γ*/C (c) and the other via its participation in light inhibition of R (d). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-03 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7497127/ /pubmed/32369617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16638 Text en © 2020 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2020 New Phytologist Trust This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Yin, Xinyou
Niu, Yuxi
van der Putten, Peter E. L.
Struik, Paul C.
The Kok effect revisited
title The Kok effect revisited
title_full The Kok effect revisited
title_fullStr The Kok effect revisited
title_full_unstemmed The Kok effect revisited
title_short The Kok effect revisited
title_sort kok effect revisited
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32369617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16638
work_keys_str_mv AT yinxinyou thekokeffectrevisited
AT niuyuxi thekokeffectrevisited
AT vanderputtenpeterel thekokeffectrevisited
AT struikpaulc thekokeffectrevisited
AT yinxinyou kokeffectrevisited
AT niuyuxi kokeffectrevisited
AT vanderputtenpeterel kokeffectrevisited
AT struikpaulc kokeffectrevisited