Cargando…

Microvascular damage assessed by optical coherence tomography angiography for glaucoma diagnosis: a systematic review of the most discriminative regions

A growing number of studies have reported a link between vascular damage and glaucoma based on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) imaging. This multitude of studies focused on different regions of interest (ROIs) which offers the possibility to draw conclusions on the most discriminativ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bekkers, Amerens, Borren, Noor, Ederveen, Vera, Fokkinga, Ella, Andrade De Jesus, Danilo, Sánchez Brea, Luisa, Klein, Stefan, van Walsum, Theo, Barbosa‐Breda, João, Stalmans, Ingeborg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32180360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.14392
_version_ 1783583259644395520
author Bekkers, Amerens
Borren, Noor
Ederveen, Vera
Fokkinga, Ella
Andrade De Jesus, Danilo
Sánchez Brea, Luisa
Klein, Stefan
van Walsum, Theo
Barbosa‐Breda, João
Stalmans, Ingeborg
author_facet Bekkers, Amerens
Borren, Noor
Ederveen, Vera
Fokkinga, Ella
Andrade De Jesus, Danilo
Sánchez Brea, Luisa
Klein, Stefan
van Walsum, Theo
Barbosa‐Breda, João
Stalmans, Ingeborg
author_sort Bekkers, Amerens
collection PubMed
description A growing number of studies have reported a link between vascular damage and glaucoma based on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) imaging. This multitude of studies focused on different regions of interest (ROIs) which offers the possibility to draw conclusions on the most discriminative locations to diagnose glaucoma. The objective of this work was to review and analyse the discriminative capacity of vascular density, retrieved from different ROIs, on differentiating healthy subjects from glaucoma patients. PubMed was used to perform a systematic review on the analysis of glaucomatous vascular damage using OCTA. All studies up to 21 April 2019 were considered. The ROIs were analysed by region (macula, optic disc and peripapillary region), layer (superficial and deep capillary plexus, avascular, whole retina, choriocapillaris and choroid) and sector (according to the Garway–Heath map). The area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) and the statistical difference (p‐value) were used to report the importance of each ROI for diagnosing glaucoma. From 96 screened studies, 43 were eligible for this review. Overall, the peripapillary region showed to be the most discriminative region with the highest mean AUROC (0.80 ± 0.09). An improvement of the AUROC from this region is observed when a sectorial analysis is performed, with the highest AUROCs obtained at the inferior and superior sectors of the superficial capillary plexus in the peripapillary region (0.86 ± 0.03 and 0.87 ± 0.10, respectively). The presented work shows that glaucomatous vascular damage can be assessed using OCTA, and its added value as a complementary feature for glaucoma diagnosis depends on the region of interest. A sectorial analysis of the superficial layer at the peripapillary region is preferable for assessing glaucomatous vascular damage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7497179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74971792020-09-25 Microvascular damage assessed by optical coherence tomography angiography for glaucoma diagnosis: a systematic review of the most discriminative regions Bekkers, Amerens Borren, Noor Ederveen, Vera Fokkinga, Ella Andrade De Jesus, Danilo Sánchez Brea, Luisa Klein, Stefan van Walsum, Theo Barbosa‐Breda, João Stalmans, Ingeborg Acta Ophthalmol Review Articles A growing number of studies have reported a link between vascular damage and glaucoma based on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) imaging. This multitude of studies focused on different regions of interest (ROIs) which offers the possibility to draw conclusions on the most discriminative locations to diagnose glaucoma. The objective of this work was to review and analyse the discriminative capacity of vascular density, retrieved from different ROIs, on differentiating healthy subjects from glaucoma patients. PubMed was used to perform a systematic review on the analysis of glaucomatous vascular damage using OCTA. All studies up to 21 April 2019 were considered. The ROIs were analysed by region (macula, optic disc and peripapillary region), layer (superficial and deep capillary plexus, avascular, whole retina, choriocapillaris and choroid) and sector (according to the Garway–Heath map). The area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) and the statistical difference (p‐value) were used to report the importance of each ROI for diagnosing glaucoma. From 96 screened studies, 43 were eligible for this review. Overall, the peripapillary region showed to be the most discriminative region with the highest mean AUROC (0.80 ± 0.09). An improvement of the AUROC from this region is observed when a sectorial analysis is performed, with the highest AUROCs obtained at the inferior and superior sectors of the superficial capillary plexus in the peripapillary region (0.86 ± 0.03 and 0.87 ± 0.10, respectively). The presented work shows that glaucomatous vascular damage can be assessed using OCTA, and its added value as a complementary feature for glaucoma diagnosis depends on the region of interest. A sectorial analysis of the superficial layer at the peripapillary region is preferable for assessing glaucomatous vascular damage. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-16 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7497179/ /pubmed/32180360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.14392 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Bekkers, Amerens
Borren, Noor
Ederveen, Vera
Fokkinga, Ella
Andrade De Jesus, Danilo
Sánchez Brea, Luisa
Klein, Stefan
van Walsum, Theo
Barbosa‐Breda, João
Stalmans, Ingeborg
Microvascular damage assessed by optical coherence tomography angiography for glaucoma diagnosis: a systematic review of the most discriminative regions
title Microvascular damage assessed by optical coherence tomography angiography for glaucoma diagnosis: a systematic review of the most discriminative regions
title_full Microvascular damage assessed by optical coherence tomography angiography for glaucoma diagnosis: a systematic review of the most discriminative regions
title_fullStr Microvascular damage assessed by optical coherence tomography angiography for glaucoma diagnosis: a systematic review of the most discriminative regions
title_full_unstemmed Microvascular damage assessed by optical coherence tomography angiography for glaucoma diagnosis: a systematic review of the most discriminative regions
title_short Microvascular damage assessed by optical coherence tomography angiography for glaucoma diagnosis: a systematic review of the most discriminative regions
title_sort microvascular damage assessed by optical coherence tomography angiography for glaucoma diagnosis: a systematic review of the most discriminative regions
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32180360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.14392
work_keys_str_mv AT bekkersamerens microvasculardamageassessedbyopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyforglaucomadiagnosisasystematicreviewofthemostdiscriminativeregions
AT borrennoor microvasculardamageassessedbyopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyforglaucomadiagnosisasystematicreviewofthemostdiscriminativeregions
AT ederveenvera microvasculardamageassessedbyopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyforglaucomadiagnosisasystematicreviewofthemostdiscriminativeregions
AT fokkingaella microvasculardamageassessedbyopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyforglaucomadiagnosisasystematicreviewofthemostdiscriminativeregions
AT andradedejesusdanilo microvasculardamageassessedbyopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyforglaucomadiagnosisasystematicreviewofthemostdiscriminativeregions
AT sanchezbrealuisa microvasculardamageassessedbyopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyforglaucomadiagnosisasystematicreviewofthemostdiscriminativeregions
AT kleinstefan microvasculardamageassessedbyopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyforglaucomadiagnosisasystematicreviewofthemostdiscriminativeregions
AT vanwalsumtheo microvasculardamageassessedbyopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyforglaucomadiagnosisasystematicreviewofthemostdiscriminativeregions
AT barbosabredajoao microvasculardamageassessedbyopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyforglaucomadiagnosisasystematicreviewofthemostdiscriminativeregions
AT stalmansingeborg microvasculardamageassessedbyopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyforglaucomadiagnosisasystematicreviewofthemostdiscriminativeregions