Cargando…
Can multicentre urodynamic studies provide high quality evidence for the clinical effectiveness of urodynamics? ICI‐RS 2019
AIMS: Lower urinary tract (LUT) function can be investigated by urodynamic studies (UDS) to establish underlying functional abnormalities in the LUT. A multicentre registry could present an opportunity to improve the scientific evidence base for UDS. During the International Consultation on Incontin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31961959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.24280 |
_version_ | 1783583268491231232 |
---|---|
author | Rademakers, Kevin Gammie, Andrew Yasmin, Habiba Cardozo, Linda Greenwell, Tamsin Harding, Christopher Kirschner‐Hermanns, Ruth Marcelissen, Tom Finazzi‐Agro, Enrico |
author_facet | Rademakers, Kevin Gammie, Andrew Yasmin, Habiba Cardozo, Linda Greenwell, Tamsin Harding, Christopher Kirschner‐Hermanns, Ruth Marcelissen, Tom Finazzi‐Agro, Enrico |
author_sort | Rademakers, Kevin |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Lower urinary tract (LUT) function can be investigated by urodynamic studies (UDS) to establish underlying functional abnormalities in the LUT. A multicentre registry could present an opportunity to improve the scientific evidence base for UDS. During the International Consultation on Incontinence Research Society (ICI‐RS) meeting in Bristol, United Kingdom 2019, an expert panel discussed the potential of a multicentre urodynamic registry to improve the quality of urodynamic output. METHODS: the potential importance of a multicentre urodynamic registry, parameter inclusion, quality control, and pitfalls during a registry roll‐out were reviewed and discussed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The clinical utility, evaluation, and effectiveness of UDS remain poorly defined due to a lack of high quality evidence and large study populations. Therefore, the ICI‐RS proposes formation of a urodynamic panel for future roll‐out of a registry. The inclusion of basic parameters was discussed and the essential parameters were defined as well as the potential pitfalls of a registry roll‐out. The discussion and recommendations in this paper form the base for future urodynamic registry development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7497217 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74972172020-09-25 Can multicentre urodynamic studies provide high quality evidence for the clinical effectiveness of urodynamics? ICI‐RS 2019 Rademakers, Kevin Gammie, Andrew Yasmin, Habiba Cardozo, Linda Greenwell, Tamsin Harding, Christopher Kirschner‐Hermanns, Ruth Marcelissen, Tom Finazzi‐Agro, Enrico Neurourol Urodyn Controversial Topic AIMS: Lower urinary tract (LUT) function can be investigated by urodynamic studies (UDS) to establish underlying functional abnormalities in the LUT. A multicentre registry could present an opportunity to improve the scientific evidence base for UDS. During the International Consultation on Incontinence Research Society (ICI‐RS) meeting in Bristol, United Kingdom 2019, an expert panel discussed the potential of a multicentre urodynamic registry to improve the quality of urodynamic output. METHODS: the potential importance of a multicentre urodynamic registry, parameter inclusion, quality control, and pitfalls during a registry roll‐out were reviewed and discussed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The clinical utility, evaluation, and effectiveness of UDS remain poorly defined due to a lack of high quality evidence and large study populations. Therefore, the ICI‐RS proposes formation of a urodynamic panel for future roll‐out of a registry. The inclusion of basic parameters was discussed and the essential parameters were defined as well as the potential pitfalls of a registry roll‐out. The discussion and recommendations in this paper form the base for future urodynamic registry development. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-21 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7497217/ /pubmed/31961959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.24280 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Neurourology and Urodynamics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Controversial Topic Rademakers, Kevin Gammie, Andrew Yasmin, Habiba Cardozo, Linda Greenwell, Tamsin Harding, Christopher Kirschner‐Hermanns, Ruth Marcelissen, Tom Finazzi‐Agro, Enrico Can multicentre urodynamic studies provide high quality evidence for the clinical effectiveness of urodynamics? ICI‐RS 2019 |
title | Can multicentre urodynamic studies provide high quality evidence for the clinical effectiveness of urodynamics? ICI‐RS 2019 |
title_full | Can multicentre urodynamic studies provide high quality evidence for the clinical effectiveness of urodynamics? ICI‐RS 2019 |
title_fullStr | Can multicentre urodynamic studies provide high quality evidence for the clinical effectiveness of urodynamics? ICI‐RS 2019 |
title_full_unstemmed | Can multicentre urodynamic studies provide high quality evidence for the clinical effectiveness of urodynamics? ICI‐RS 2019 |
title_short | Can multicentre urodynamic studies provide high quality evidence for the clinical effectiveness of urodynamics? ICI‐RS 2019 |
title_sort | can multicentre urodynamic studies provide high quality evidence for the clinical effectiveness of urodynamics? ici‐rs 2019 |
topic | Controversial Topic |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31961959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.24280 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rademakerskevin canmulticentreurodynamicstudiesprovidehighqualityevidencefortheclinicaleffectivenessofurodynamicsicirs2019 AT gammieandrew canmulticentreurodynamicstudiesprovidehighqualityevidencefortheclinicaleffectivenessofurodynamicsicirs2019 AT yasminhabiba canmulticentreurodynamicstudiesprovidehighqualityevidencefortheclinicaleffectivenessofurodynamicsicirs2019 AT cardozolinda canmulticentreurodynamicstudiesprovidehighqualityevidencefortheclinicaleffectivenessofurodynamicsicirs2019 AT greenwelltamsin canmulticentreurodynamicstudiesprovidehighqualityevidencefortheclinicaleffectivenessofurodynamicsicirs2019 AT hardingchristopher canmulticentreurodynamicstudiesprovidehighqualityevidencefortheclinicaleffectivenessofurodynamicsicirs2019 AT kirschnerhermannsruth canmulticentreurodynamicstudiesprovidehighqualityevidencefortheclinicaleffectivenessofurodynamicsicirs2019 AT marcelissentom canmulticentreurodynamicstudiesprovidehighqualityevidencefortheclinicaleffectivenessofurodynamicsicirs2019 AT finazziagroenrico canmulticentreurodynamicstudiesprovidehighqualityevidencefortheclinicaleffectivenessofurodynamicsicirs2019 |