Cargando…

Can multicentre urodynamic studies provide high quality evidence for the clinical effectiveness of urodynamics? ICI‐RS 2019

AIMS: Lower urinary tract (LUT) function can be investigated by urodynamic studies (UDS) to establish underlying functional abnormalities in the LUT. A multicentre registry could present an opportunity to improve the scientific evidence base for UDS. During the International Consultation on Incontin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rademakers, Kevin, Gammie, Andrew, Yasmin, Habiba, Cardozo, Linda, Greenwell, Tamsin, Harding, Christopher, Kirschner‐Hermanns, Ruth, Marcelissen, Tom, Finazzi‐Agro, Enrico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31961959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.24280
_version_ 1783583268491231232
author Rademakers, Kevin
Gammie, Andrew
Yasmin, Habiba
Cardozo, Linda
Greenwell, Tamsin
Harding, Christopher
Kirschner‐Hermanns, Ruth
Marcelissen, Tom
Finazzi‐Agro, Enrico
author_facet Rademakers, Kevin
Gammie, Andrew
Yasmin, Habiba
Cardozo, Linda
Greenwell, Tamsin
Harding, Christopher
Kirschner‐Hermanns, Ruth
Marcelissen, Tom
Finazzi‐Agro, Enrico
author_sort Rademakers, Kevin
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Lower urinary tract (LUT) function can be investigated by urodynamic studies (UDS) to establish underlying functional abnormalities in the LUT. A multicentre registry could present an opportunity to improve the scientific evidence base for UDS. During the International Consultation on Incontinence Research Society (ICI‐RS) meeting in Bristol, United Kingdom 2019, an expert panel discussed the potential of a multicentre urodynamic registry to improve the quality of urodynamic output. METHODS: the potential importance of a multicentre urodynamic registry, parameter inclusion, quality control, and pitfalls during a registry roll‐out were reviewed and discussed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The clinical utility, evaluation, and effectiveness of UDS remain poorly defined due to a lack of high quality evidence and large study populations. Therefore, the ICI‐RS proposes formation of a urodynamic panel for future roll‐out of a registry. The inclusion of basic parameters was discussed and the essential parameters were defined as well as the potential pitfalls of a registry roll‐out. The discussion and recommendations in this paper form the base for future urodynamic registry development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7497217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74972172020-09-25 Can multicentre urodynamic studies provide high quality evidence for the clinical effectiveness of urodynamics? ICI‐RS 2019 Rademakers, Kevin Gammie, Andrew Yasmin, Habiba Cardozo, Linda Greenwell, Tamsin Harding, Christopher Kirschner‐Hermanns, Ruth Marcelissen, Tom Finazzi‐Agro, Enrico Neurourol Urodyn Controversial Topic AIMS: Lower urinary tract (LUT) function can be investigated by urodynamic studies (UDS) to establish underlying functional abnormalities in the LUT. A multicentre registry could present an opportunity to improve the scientific evidence base for UDS. During the International Consultation on Incontinence Research Society (ICI‐RS) meeting in Bristol, United Kingdom 2019, an expert panel discussed the potential of a multicentre urodynamic registry to improve the quality of urodynamic output. METHODS: the potential importance of a multicentre urodynamic registry, parameter inclusion, quality control, and pitfalls during a registry roll‐out were reviewed and discussed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The clinical utility, evaluation, and effectiveness of UDS remain poorly defined due to a lack of high quality evidence and large study populations. Therefore, the ICI‐RS proposes formation of a urodynamic panel for future roll‐out of a registry. The inclusion of basic parameters was discussed and the essential parameters were defined as well as the potential pitfalls of a registry roll‐out. The discussion and recommendations in this paper form the base for future urodynamic registry development. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-21 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7497217/ /pubmed/31961959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.24280 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Neurourology and Urodynamics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Controversial Topic
Rademakers, Kevin
Gammie, Andrew
Yasmin, Habiba
Cardozo, Linda
Greenwell, Tamsin
Harding, Christopher
Kirschner‐Hermanns, Ruth
Marcelissen, Tom
Finazzi‐Agro, Enrico
Can multicentre urodynamic studies provide high quality evidence for the clinical effectiveness of urodynamics? ICI‐RS 2019
title Can multicentre urodynamic studies provide high quality evidence for the clinical effectiveness of urodynamics? ICI‐RS 2019
title_full Can multicentre urodynamic studies provide high quality evidence for the clinical effectiveness of urodynamics? ICI‐RS 2019
title_fullStr Can multicentre urodynamic studies provide high quality evidence for the clinical effectiveness of urodynamics? ICI‐RS 2019
title_full_unstemmed Can multicentre urodynamic studies provide high quality evidence for the clinical effectiveness of urodynamics? ICI‐RS 2019
title_short Can multicentre urodynamic studies provide high quality evidence for the clinical effectiveness of urodynamics? ICI‐RS 2019
title_sort can multicentre urodynamic studies provide high quality evidence for the clinical effectiveness of urodynamics? ici‐rs 2019
topic Controversial Topic
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31961959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.24280
work_keys_str_mv AT rademakerskevin canmulticentreurodynamicstudiesprovidehighqualityevidencefortheclinicaleffectivenessofurodynamicsicirs2019
AT gammieandrew canmulticentreurodynamicstudiesprovidehighqualityevidencefortheclinicaleffectivenessofurodynamicsicirs2019
AT yasminhabiba canmulticentreurodynamicstudiesprovidehighqualityevidencefortheclinicaleffectivenessofurodynamicsicirs2019
AT cardozolinda canmulticentreurodynamicstudiesprovidehighqualityevidencefortheclinicaleffectivenessofurodynamicsicirs2019
AT greenwelltamsin canmulticentreurodynamicstudiesprovidehighqualityevidencefortheclinicaleffectivenessofurodynamicsicirs2019
AT hardingchristopher canmulticentreurodynamicstudiesprovidehighqualityevidencefortheclinicaleffectivenessofurodynamicsicirs2019
AT kirschnerhermannsruth canmulticentreurodynamicstudiesprovidehighqualityevidencefortheclinicaleffectivenessofurodynamicsicirs2019
AT marcelissentom canmulticentreurodynamicstudiesprovidehighqualityevidencefortheclinicaleffectivenessofurodynamicsicirs2019
AT finazziagroenrico canmulticentreurodynamicstudiesprovidehighqualityevidencefortheclinicaleffectivenessofurodynamicsicirs2019