Cargando…

Classification for treatment urgency for the microphthalmia/anophthalmia spectrum using clinical and biometrical characteristics

PURPOSE: Current clinical classifications do not distinguish between the severity of the MICrophthalmia/Anophthalmia (MICA) spectrum with regard to treatment urgency. We aim to provide parameters for distinguishing mild, moderate and severe MICA using clinical and biometrical characteristics. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Groot, Annabel L.W., Kuijten, Maayke M.P., Remmers, Jelmer, Gilani, Asra, Mourits, Daphne L., Kraal‐Biezen, Elke, de Graaf, Pim, Zwijnenburg, Petra J., Moll, Annette C., Tan, Stevie, Saeed, Peerooz, Hartong, Dyonne T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32100474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.14364
_version_ 1783583276163661824
author Groot, Annabel L.W.
Kuijten, Maayke M.P.
Remmers, Jelmer
Gilani, Asra
Mourits, Daphne L.
Kraal‐Biezen, Elke
de Graaf, Pim
Zwijnenburg, Petra J.
Moll, Annette C.
Tan, Stevie
Saeed, Peerooz
Hartong, Dyonne T.
author_facet Groot, Annabel L.W.
Kuijten, Maayke M.P.
Remmers, Jelmer
Gilani, Asra
Mourits, Daphne L.
Kraal‐Biezen, Elke
de Graaf, Pim
Zwijnenburg, Petra J.
Moll, Annette C.
Tan, Stevie
Saeed, Peerooz
Hartong, Dyonne T.
author_sort Groot, Annabel L.W.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Current clinical classifications do not distinguish between the severity of the MICrophthalmia/Anophthalmia (MICA) spectrum with regard to treatment urgency. We aim to provide parameters for distinguishing mild, moderate and severe MICA using clinical and biometrical characteristics. METHODS: We performed a single‐centre, cross‐sectional analysis of prospective cohort of 58 MICA children from September 2013 to February 2018 seen at the Amsterdam University Medical Center, The Netherlands. All patients with a visible underdeveloped globe were included. We performed full ophthalmic evaluation including horizontal palpebral fissure length, axial length by ultrasound and/or MRI measurements, paediatric and genetic evaluation. Cases were subdivided based on clinical characteristics. Biometrical data were used to calculate the relative axial length (rAL) and the relative horizontal palpebral fissure length (rHPF) compared with the healthy contralateral eye for unilateral cases. RESULTS: In previously untreated patients, a strong correlation exists between rAL and rHPF, distinguishing between severe, moderate and mild subjects using rAL of 0–45%, 45–75% and 75%–100%, respectively. Clinical subgroups were randomly dispersed throughout the scatterplot. CONCLUSION: Current classifications lack clinical implications for MICA patients. We suggest measuring eyelid length and axial length to classify the severity and determine treatment strategy. The ‘severe’ group has obvious asymmetry and abnormal socket configuration for which therapy should quickly be initiated; the ‘moderately’ affected group has normal socket anatomy with a microphthalmic eye with disturbing asymmetry for which treatment should be initiated within months of development; the ‘mild’ group has a slightly smaller axial length or less obvious eyelid asymmetry for which reconstructive correction is possible, but expansive conformer treatment is unnecessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7497250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74972502020-09-25 Classification for treatment urgency for the microphthalmia/anophthalmia spectrum using clinical and biometrical characteristics Groot, Annabel L.W. Kuijten, Maayke M.P. Remmers, Jelmer Gilani, Asra Mourits, Daphne L. Kraal‐Biezen, Elke de Graaf, Pim Zwijnenburg, Petra J. Moll, Annette C. Tan, Stevie Saeed, Peerooz Hartong, Dyonne T. Acta Ophthalmol Original Articles PURPOSE: Current clinical classifications do not distinguish between the severity of the MICrophthalmia/Anophthalmia (MICA) spectrum with regard to treatment urgency. We aim to provide parameters for distinguishing mild, moderate and severe MICA using clinical and biometrical characteristics. METHODS: We performed a single‐centre, cross‐sectional analysis of prospective cohort of 58 MICA children from September 2013 to February 2018 seen at the Amsterdam University Medical Center, The Netherlands. All patients with a visible underdeveloped globe were included. We performed full ophthalmic evaluation including horizontal palpebral fissure length, axial length by ultrasound and/or MRI measurements, paediatric and genetic evaluation. Cases were subdivided based on clinical characteristics. Biometrical data were used to calculate the relative axial length (rAL) and the relative horizontal palpebral fissure length (rHPF) compared with the healthy contralateral eye for unilateral cases. RESULTS: In previously untreated patients, a strong correlation exists between rAL and rHPF, distinguishing between severe, moderate and mild subjects using rAL of 0–45%, 45–75% and 75%–100%, respectively. Clinical subgroups were randomly dispersed throughout the scatterplot. CONCLUSION: Current classifications lack clinical implications for MICA patients. We suggest measuring eyelid length and axial length to classify the severity and determine treatment strategy. The ‘severe’ group has obvious asymmetry and abnormal socket configuration for which therapy should quickly be initiated; the ‘moderately’ affected group has normal socket anatomy with a microphthalmic eye with disturbing asymmetry for which treatment should be initiated within months of development; the ‘mild’ group has a slightly smaller axial length or less obvious eyelid asymmetry for which reconstructive correction is possible, but expansive conformer treatment is unnecessary. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-02-25 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7497250/ /pubmed/32100474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.14364 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Groot, Annabel L.W.
Kuijten, Maayke M.P.
Remmers, Jelmer
Gilani, Asra
Mourits, Daphne L.
Kraal‐Biezen, Elke
de Graaf, Pim
Zwijnenburg, Petra J.
Moll, Annette C.
Tan, Stevie
Saeed, Peerooz
Hartong, Dyonne T.
Classification for treatment urgency for the microphthalmia/anophthalmia spectrum using clinical and biometrical characteristics
title Classification for treatment urgency for the microphthalmia/anophthalmia spectrum using clinical and biometrical characteristics
title_full Classification for treatment urgency for the microphthalmia/anophthalmia spectrum using clinical and biometrical characteristics
title_fullStr Classification for treatment urgency for the microphthalmia/anophthalmia spectrum using clinical and biometrical characteristics
title_full_unstemmed Classification for treatment urgency for the microphthalmia/anophthalmia spectrum using clinical and biometrical characteristics
title_short Classification for treatment urgency for the microphthalmia/anophthalmia spectrum using clinical and biometrical characteristics
title_sort classification for treatment urgency for the microphthalmia/anophthalmia spectrum using clinical and biometrical characteristics
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32100474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.14364
work_keys_str_mv AT grootannabellw classificationfortreatmenturgencyforthemicrophthalmiaanophthalmiaspectrumusingclinicalandbiometricalcharacteristics
AT kuijtenmaaykemp classificationfortreatmenturgencyforthemicrophthalmiaanophthalmiaspectrumusingclinicalandbiometricalcharacteristics
AT remmersjelmer classificationfortreatmenturgencyforthemicrophthalmiaanophthalmiaspectrumusingclinicalandbiometricalcharacteristics
AT gilaniasra classificationfortreatmenturgencyforthemicrophthalmiaanophthalmiaspectrumusingclinicalandbiometricalcharacteristics
AT mouritsdaphnel classificationfortreatmenturgencyforthemicrophthalmiaanophthalmiaspectrumusingclinicalandbiometricalcharacteristics
AT kraalbiezenelke classificationfortreatmenturgencyforthemicrophthalmiaanophthalmiaspectrumusingclinicalandbiometricalcharacteristics
AT degraafpim classificationfortreatmenturgencyforthemicrophthalmiaanophthalmiaspectrumusingclinicalandbiometricalcharacteristics
AT zwijnenburgpetraj classificationfortreatmenturgencyforthemicrophthalmiaanophthalmiaspectrumusingclinicalandbiometricalcharacteristics
AT mollannettec classificationfortreatmenturgencyforthemicrophthalmiaanophthalmiaspectrumusingclinicalandbiometricalcharacteristics
AT tanstevie classificationfortreatmenturgencyforthemicrophthalmiaanophthalmiaspectrumusingclinicalandbiometricalcharacteristics
AT saeedpeerooz classificationfortreatmenturgencyforthemicrophthalmiaanophthalmiaspectrumusingclinicalandbiometricalcharacteristics
AT hartongdyonnet classificationfortreatmenturgencyforthemicrophthalmiaanophthalmiaspectrumusingclinicalandbiometricalcharacteristics