Cargando…

Instrument-based Tests for Measuring Anterior Chamber Cells in Uveitis: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE: New instrument-based techniques for anterior chamber (AC) cell counting can offer automation and objectivity above clinician assessment. This review aims to identify such instruments and its correlation with clinician estimates. METHODS: Using standard systematic review methodology, we iden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xiaoxuan, Solebo, Ameenat L., Faes, Livia, Beese, Sophie, Braithwaite, Tasanee, Round, Matthew E., Panthagani, Jesse, Kale, Aditya U., McNally, Thomas W., Abdulla, Didar, Keane, Pearse A., Moore, David J., Denniston, Alastair K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31418609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2019.1640883
_version_ 1783583282975211520
author Liu, Xiaoxuan
Solebo, Ameenat L.
Faes, Livia
Beese, Sophie
Braithwaite, Tasanee
Round, Matthew E.
Panthagani, Jesse
Kale, Aditya U.
McNally, Thomas W.
Abdulla, Didar
Keane, Pearse A.
Moore, David J.
Denniston, Alastair K.
author_facet Liu, Xiaoxuan
Solebo, Ameenat L.
Faes, Livia
Beese, Sophie
Braithwaite, Tasanee
Round, Matthew E.
Panthagani, Jesse
Kale, Aditya U.
McNally, Thomas W.
Abdulla, Didar
Keane, Pearse A.
Moore, David J.
Denniston, Alastair K.
author_sort Liu, Xiaoxuan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: New instrument-based techniques for anterior chamber (AC) cell counting can offer automation and objectivity above clinician assessment. This review aims to identify such instruments and its correlation with clinician estimates. METHODS: Using standard systematic review methodology, we identified and tabulated the outcomes of studies reporting reliability and correlation between instrument-based measurements and clinician AC cell grading. RESULTS: From 3470 studies, 6 reported correlation between an instrument-based AC cell count to clinician grading. The two instruments were optical coherence tomography (OCT) and laser flare-cell photometry (LFCP). Correlation between clinician grading and LFCP was 0.66–0.87 and 0.06–0.97 between clinician grading and OCT. OCT volume scans demonstrated correlation between 0.75 and 0.78. Line scans in the middle AC demonstrated higher correlation (0.73–0.97) than in the inferior AC (0.06–0.56). CONCLUSION: AC cell count by OCT and LFP can achieve high levels of correlation with clinician grading, whilst offering additional advantages of speed, automation, and objectivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7497279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74972792020-09-23 Instrument-based Tests for Measuring Anterior Chamber Cells in Uveitis: A Systematic Review Liu, Xiaoxuan Solebo, Ameenat L. Faes, Livia Beese, Sophie Braithwaite, Tasanee Round, Matthew E. Panthagani, Jesse Kale, Aditya U. McNally, Thomas W. Abdulla, Didar Keane, Pearse A. Moore, David J. Denniston, Alastair K. Ocul Immunol Inflamm Original Article PURPOSE: New instrument-based techniques for anterior chamber (AC) cell counting can offer automation and objectivity above clinician assessment. This review aims to identify such instruments and its correlation with clinician estimates. METHODS: Using standard systematic review methodology, we identified and tabulated the outcomes of studies reporting reliability and correlation between instrument-based measurements and clinician AC cell grading. RESULTS: From 3470 studies, 6 reported correlation between an instrument-based AC cell count to clinician grading. The two instruments were optical coherence tomography (OCT) and laser flare-cell photometry (LFCP). Correlation between clinician grading and LFCP was 0.66–0.87 and 0.06–0.97 between clinician grading and OCT. OCT volume scans demonstrated correlation between 0.75 and 0.78. Line scans in the middle AC demonstrated higher correlation (0.73–0.97) than in the inferior AC (0.06–0.56). CONCLUSION: AC cell count by OCT and LFP can achieve high levels of correlation with clinician grading, whilst offering additional advantages of speed, automation, and objectivity. Taylor & Francis 2019-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7497279/ /pubmed/31418609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2019.1640883 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Liu, Xiaoxuan
Solebo, Ameenat L.
Faes, Livia
Beese, Sophie
Braithwaite, Tasanee
Round, Matthew E.
Panthagani, Jesse
Kale, Aditya U.
McNally, Thomas W.
Abdulla, Didar
Keane, Pearse A.
Moore, David J.
Denniston, Alastair K.
Instrument-based Tests for Measuring Anterior Chamber Cells in Uveitis: A Systematic Review
title Instrument-based Tests for Measuring Anterior Chamber Cells in Uveitis: A Systematic Review
title_full Instrument-based Tests for Measuring Anterior Chamber Cells in Uveitis: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Instrument-based Tests for Measuring Anterior Chamber Cells in Uveitis: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Instrument-based Tests for Measuring Anterior Chamber Cells in Uveitis: A Systematic Review
title_short Instrument-based Tests for Measuring Anterior Chamber Cells in Uveitis: A Systematic Review
title_sort instrument-based tests for measuring anterior chamber cells in uveitis: a systematic review
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31418609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2019.1640883
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxiaoxuan instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview
AT soleboameenatl instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview
AT faeslivia instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview
AT beesesophie instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview
AT braithwaitetasanee instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview
AT roundmatthewe instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview
AT panthaganijesse instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview
AT kaleadityau instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview
AT mcnallythomasw instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview
AT abdulladidar instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview
AT keanepearsea instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview
AT mooredavidj instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview
AT dennistonalastairk instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview