Cargando…
Instrument-based Tests for Measuring Anterior Chamber Cells in Uveitis: A Systematic Review
PURPOSE: New instrument-based techniques for anterior chamber (AC) cell counting can offer automation and objectivity above clinician assessment. This review aims to identify such instruments and its correlation with clinician estimates. METHODS: Using standard systematic review methodology, we iden...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31418609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2019.1640883 |
_version_ | 1783583282975211520 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Xiaoxuan Solebo, Ameenat L. Faes, Livia Beese, Sophie Braithwaite, Tasanee Round, Matthew E. Panthagani, Jesse Kale, Aditya U. McNally, Thomas W. Abdulla, Didar Keane, Pearse A. Moore, David J. Denniston, Alastair K. |
author_facet | Liu, Xiaoxuan Solebo, Ameenat L. Faes, Livia Beese, Sophie Braithwaite, Tasanee Round, Matthew E. Panthagani, Jesse Kale, Aditya U. McNally, Thomas W. Abdulla, Didar Keane, Pearse A. Moore, David J. Denniston, Alastair K. |
author_sort | Liu, Xiaoxuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: New instrument-based techniques for anterior chamber (AC) cell counting can offer automation and objectivity above clinician assessment. This review aims to identify such instruments and its correlation with clinician estimates. METHODS: Using standard systematic review methodology, we identified and tabulated the outcomes of studies reporting reliability and correlation between instrument-based measurements and clinician AC cell grading. RESULTS: From 3470 studies, 6 reported correlation between an instrument-based AC cell count to clinician grading. The two instruments were optical coherence tomography (OCT) and laser flare-cell photometry (LFCP). Correlation between clinician grading and LFCP was 0.66–0.87 and 0.06–0.97 between clinician grading and OCT. OCT volume scans demonstrated correlation between 0.75 and 0.78. Line scans in the middle AC demonstrated higher correlation (0.73–0.97) than in the inferior AC (0.06–0.56). CONCLUSION: AC cell count by OCT and LFP can achieve high levels of correlation with clinician grading, whilst offering additional advantages of speed, automation, and objectivity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7497279 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74972792020-09-23 Instrument-based Tests for Measuring Anterior Chamber Cells in Uveitis: A Systematic Review Liu, Xiaoxuan Solebo, Ameenat L. Faes, Livia Beese, Sophie Braithwaite, Tasanee Round, Matthew E. Panthagani, Jesse Kale, Aditya U. McNally, Thomas W. Abdulla, Didar Keane, Pearse A. Moore, David J. Denniston, Alastair K. Ocul Immunol Inflamm Original Article PURPOSE: New instrument-based techniques for anterior chamber (AC) cell counting can offer automation and objectivity above clinician assessment. This review aims to identify such instruments and its correlation with clinician estimates. METHODS: Using standard systematic review methodology, we identified and tabulated the outcomes of studies reporting reliability and correlation between instrument-based measurements and clinician AC cell grading. RESULTS: From 3470 studies, 6 reported correlation between an instrument-based AC cell count to clinician grading. The two instruments were optical coherence tomography (OCT) and laser flare-cell photometry (LFCP). Correlation between clinician grading and LFCP was 0.66–0.87 and 0.06–0.97 between clinician grading and OCT. OCT volume scans demonstrated correlation between 0.75 and 0.78. Line scans in the middle AC demonstrated higher correlation (0.73–0.97) than in the inferior AC (0.06–0.56). CONCLUSION: AC cell count by OCT and LFP can achieve high levels of correlation with clinician grading, whilst offering additional advantages of speed, automation, and objectivity. Taylor & Francis 2019-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7497279/ /pubmed/31418609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2019.1640883 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Liu, Xiaoxuan Solebo, Ameenat L. Faes, Livia Beese, Sophie Braithwaite, Tasanee Round, Matthew E. Panthagani, Jesse Kale, Aditya U. McNally, Thomas W. Abdulla, Didar Keane, Pearse A. Moore, David J. Denniston, Alastair K. Instrument-based Tests for Measuring Anterior Chamber Cells in Uveitis: A Systematic Review |
title | Instrument-based Tests for Measuring Anterior Chamber Cells in Uveitis: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Instrument-based Tests for Measuring Anterior Chamber Cells in Uveitis: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Instrument-based Tests for Measuring Anterior Chamber Cells in Uveitis: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Instrument-based Tests for Measuring Anterior Chamber Cells in Uveitis: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Instrument-based Tests for Measuring Anterior Chamber Cells in Uveitis: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | instrument-based tests for measuring anterior chamber cells in uveitis: a systematic review |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31418609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2019.1640883 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuxiaoxuan instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview AT soleboameenatl instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview AT faeslivia instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview AT beesesophie instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview AT braithwaitetasanee instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview AT roundmatthewe instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview AT panthaganijesse instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview AT kaleadityau instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview AT mcnallythomasw instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview AT abdulladidar instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview AT keanepearsea instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview AT mooredavidj instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview AT dennistonalastairk instrumentbasedtestsformeasuringanteriorchambercellsinuveitisasystematicreview |