Cargando…

Use of virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting: how do changes in the work of being a patient influence patient preferences? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review qualitative studies reporting the use of virtual consultations within an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting and to understand how its use changes the work required of patients. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gilbert, Anthony W, Jones, Jeremy, Jaggi, Anju, May, Carl R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32938591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036197
_version_ 1783583335051689984
author Gilbert, Anthony W
Jones, Jeremy
Jaggi, Anju
May, Carl R
author_facet Gilbert, Anthony W
Jones, Jeremy
Jaggi, Anju
May, Carl R
author_sort Gilbert, Anthony W
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To systematically review qualitative studies reporting the use of virtual consultations within an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting and to understand how its use changes the work required of patients. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement, we conducted a systematic review of papers to answer the research question ‘How do changes in the work of being a patient when using communication technology influence patient preferences?’ Electronic databases were searched for studies meeting the inclusion criteria in April 2020. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 2057 research articles from the database search. A review of titles and abstracts using the inclusion criteria yielded 21 articles for full-text review. Nine studies were included in the final analysis. Six studies explored real-time video conferencing and three explored telephone consultations. The use of communication technology changes the work required of patients. Such changes will impact on expectations for care, resources required of patients, the environment of receiving care and patient–clinician interactions. This adjustment of the work required of patients who access orthopaedic rehabilitation using communication technology will impact on their experience of receiving care. It is proposed that changes in the work of being a patient will influence preferences for or against the use of communication technology consultations for orthopaedic rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: We found that the use of communication technology changes the work of being a patient. The change in work required of patients can be both burdensome (it makes it harder for patients to access their care) and beneficial (it makes it easier for patients to access their care). This change will likely to influence preferences. Keeping the concept of patient work at the heart of pathway redesign is likely to be a key consideration to ensure successful implementation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018100896.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7497523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74975232020-09-28 Use of virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting: how do changes in the work of being a patient influence patient preferences? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis Gilbert, Anthony W Jones, Jeremy Jaggi, Anju May, Carl R BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVES: To systematically review qualitative studies reporting the use of virtual consultations within an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting and to understand how its use changes the work required of patients. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement, we conducted a systematic review of papers to answer the research question ‘How do changes in the work of being a patient when using communication technology influence patient preferences?’ Electronic databases were searched for studies meeting the inclusion criteria in April 2020. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 2057 research articles from the database search. A review of titles and abstracts using the inclusion criteria yielded 21 articles for full-text review. Nine studies were included in the final analysis. Six studies explored real-time video conferencing and three explored telephone consultations. The use of communication technology changes the work required of patients. Such changes will impact on expectations for care, resources required of patients, the environment of receiving care and patient–clinician interactions. This adjustment of the work required of patients who access orthopaedic rehabilitation using communication technology will impact on their experience of receiving care. It is proposed that changes in the work of being a patient will influence preferences for or against the use of communication technology consultations for orthopaedic rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: We found that the use of communication technology changes the work of being a patient. The change in work required of patients can be both burdensome (it makes it harder for patients to access their care) and beneficial (it makes it easier for patients to access their care). This change will likely to influence preferences. Keeping the concept of patient work at the heart of pathway redesign is likely to be a key consideration to ensure successful implementation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018100896. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7497523/ /pubmed/32938591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036197 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Gilbert, Anthony W
Jones, Jeremy
Jaggi, Anju
May, Carl R
Use of virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting: how do changes in the work of being a patient influence patient preferences? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis
title Use of virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting: how do changes in the work of being a patient influence patient preferences? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis
title_full Use of virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting: how do changes in the work of being a patient influence patient preferences? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis
title_fullStr Use of virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting: how do changes in the work of being a patient influence patient preferences? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Use of virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting: how do changes in the work of being a patient influence patient preferences? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis
title_short Use of virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting: how do changes in the work of being a patient influence patient preferences? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis
title_sort use of virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting: how do changes in the work of being a patient influence patient preferences? a systematic review and qualitative synthesis
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32938591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036197
work_keys_str_mv AT gilbertanthonyw useofvirtualconsultationsinanorthopaedicrehabilitationsettinghowdochangesintheworkofbeingapatientinfluencepatientpreferencesasystematicreviewandqualitativesynthesis
AT jonesjeremy useofvirtualconsultationsinanorthopaedicrehabilitationsettinghowdochangesintheworkofbeingapatientinfluencepatientpreferencesasystematicreviewandqualitativesynthesis
AT jaggianju useofvirtualconsultationsinanorthopaedicrehabilitationsettinghowdochangesintheworkofbeingapatientinfluencepatientpreferencesasystematicreviewandqualitativesynthesis
AT maycarlr useofvirtualconsultationsinanorthopaedicrehabilitationsettinghowdochangesintheworkofbeingapatientinfluencepatientpreferencesasystematicreviewandqualitativesynthesis