Cargando…
Prognostic value of histopathological DCIS features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study
PURPOSE: For optimal management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), reproducible histopathological assessment is essential to distinguish low-risk from high-risk DCIS. Therefore, we analyzed interrater reliability of histopathological DCIS features and assessed their associations with subsequent ips...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32734520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05816-x |
_version_ | 1783583369075884032 |
---|---|
author | Groen, Emma J. Hudecek, Jan Mulder, Lennart van Seijen, Maartje Almekinders, Mathilde M. Alexov, Stoyan Kovács, Anikó Ryska, Ales Varga, Zsuzsanna Andreu Navarro, Francisco-Javier Bianchi, Simonetta Vreuls, Willem Balslev, Eva Boot, Max V. Kulka, Janina Chmielik, Ewa Barbé, Ellis de Rooij, Mathilda J. Vos, Winand Farkas, Andrea Leeuwis-Fedorovich, Natalja E. Regitnig, Peter Westenend, Pieter J. Kooreman, Loes F. S. Quinn, Cecily Floris, Giuseppe Cserni, Gábor van Diest, Paul J. Lips, Esther H. Schaapveld, Michael Wesseling, Jelle |
author_facet | Groen, Emma J. Hudecek, Jan Mulder, Lennart van Seijen, Maartje Almekinders, Mathilde M. Alexov, Stoyan Kovács, Anikó Ryska, Ales Varga, Zsuzsanna Andreu Navarro, Francisco-Javier Bianchi, Simonetta Vreuls, Willem Balslev, Eva Boot, Max V. Kulka, Janina Chmielik, Ewa Barbé, Ellis de Rooij, Mathilda J. Vos, Winand Farkas, Andrea Leeuwis-Fedorovich, Natalja E. Regitnig, Peter Westenend, Pieter J. Kooreman, Loes F. S. Quinn, Cecily Floris, Giuseppe Cserni, Gábor van Diest, Paul J. Lips, Esther H. Schaapveld, Michael Wesseling, Jelle |
author_sort | Groen, Emma J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: For optimal management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), reproducible histopathological assessment is essential to distinguish low-risk from high-risk DCIS. Therefore, we analyzed interrater reliability of histopathological DCIS features and assessed their associations with subsequent ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (iIBC) risk. METHODS: Using a case-cohort design, reliability was assessed in a population-based, nationwide cohort of 2767 women with screen-detected DCIS diagnosed between 1993 and 2004, treated by breast-conserving surgery with/without radiotherapy (BCS ± RT) using Krippendorff’s alpha (KA) and Gwet’s AC2 (GAC2). Thirty-eight raters scored histopathological DCIS features including grade (2-tiered and 3-tiered), growth pattern, mitotic activity, periductal fibrosis, and lymphocytic infiltrate in 342 women. Using majority opinion-based scores for each feature, their association with subsequent iIBC risk was assessed using Cox regression. RESULTS: Interrater reliability of grade using various classifications was fair to moderate, and only substantial for grade 1 versus 2 + 3 when using GAC2 (0.78). Reliability for growth pattern (KA 0.44, GAC2 0.78), calcifications (KA 0.49, GAC2 0.70) and necrosis (KA 0.47, GAC2 0.70) was moderate using KA and substantial using GAC2; for (type of) periductal fibrosis and lymphocytic infiltrate fair to moderate estimates were found and for mitotic activity reliability was substantial using GAC2 (0.70). Only in patients treated with BCS-RT, high mitotic activity was associated with a higher iIBC risk in univariable analysis (Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.53, 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) 1.05–6.11); grade 3 versus 1 + 2 (HR 2.64, 95% CI 1.35–5.14) and a cribriform/solid versus flat epithelial atypia/clinging/(micro)papillary growth pattern (HR 3.70, 95% CI 1.34–10.23) were independently associated with a higher iIBC risk. CONCLUSIONS: Using majority opinion-based scores, DCIS grade, growth pattern, and mitotic activity are associated with iIBC risk in patients treated with BCS-RT, but interrater variability is substantial. Semi-quantitative grading, incorporating and separately evaluating nuclear pleomorphism, growth pattern, and mitotic activity, may improve the reliability and prognostic value of these features. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-020-05816-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7497690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74976902020-09-28 Prognostic value of histopathological DCIS features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study Groen, Emma J. Hudecek, Jan Mulder, Lennart van Seijen, Maartje Almekinders, Mathilde M. Alexov, Stoyan Kovács, Anikó Ryska, Ales Varga, Zsuzsanna Andreu Navarro, Francisco-Javier Bianchi, Simonetta Vreuls, Willem Balslev, Eva Boot, Max V. Kulka, Janina Chmielik, Ewa Barbé, Ellis de Rooij, Mathilda J. Vos, Winand Farkas, Andrea Leeuwis-Fedorovich, Natalja E. Regitnig, Peter Westenend, Pieter J. Kooreman, Loes F. S. Quinn, Cecily Floris, Giuseppe Cserni, Gábor van Diest, Paul J. Lips, Esther H. Schaapveld, Michael Wesseling, Jelle Breast Cancer Res Treat Epidemiology PURPOSE: For optimal management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), reproducible histopathological assessment is essential to distinguish low-risk from high-risk DCIS. Therefore, we analyzed interrater reliability of histopathological DCIS features and assessed their associations with subsequent ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (iIBC) risk. METHODS: Using a case-cohort design, reliability was assessed in a population-based, nationwide cohort of 2767 women with screen-detected DCIS diagnosed between 1993 and 2004, treated by breast-conserving surgery with/without radiotherapy (BCS ± RT) using Krippendorff’s alpha (KA) and Gwet’s AC2 (GAC2). Thirty-eight raters scored histopathological DCIS features including grade (2-tiered and 3-tiered), growth pattern, mitotic activity, periductal fibrosis, and lymphocytic infiltrate in 342 women. Using majority opinion-based scores for each feature, their association with subsequent iIBC risk was assessed using Cox regression. RESULTS: Interrater reliability of grade using various classifications was fair to moderate, and only substantial for grade 1 versus 2 + 3 when using GAC2 (0.78). Reliability for growth pattern (KA 0.44, GAC2 0.78), calcifications (KA 0.49, GAC2 0.70) and necrosis (KA 0.47, GAC2 0.70) was moderate using KA and substantial using GAC2; for (type of) periductal fibrosis and lymphocytic infiltrate fair to moderate estimates were found and for mitotic activity reliability was substantial using GAC2 (0.70). Only in patients treated with BCS-RT, high mitotic activity was associated with a higher iIBC risk in univariable analysis (Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.53, 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) 1.05–6.11); grade 3 versus 1 + 2 (HR 2.64, 95% CI 1.35–5.14) and a cribriform/solid versus flat epithelial atypia/clinging/(micro)papillary growth pattern (HR 3.70, 95% CI 1.34–10.23) were independently associated with a higher iIBC risk. CONCLUSIONS: Using majority opinion-based scores, DCIS grade, growth pattern, and mitotic activity are associated with iIBC risk in patients treated with BCS-RT, but interrater variability is substantial. Semi-quantitative grading, incorporating and separately evaluating nuclear pleomorphism, growth pattern, and mitotic activity, may improve the reliability and prognostic value of these features. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-020-05816-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-07-30 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7497690/ /pubmed/32734520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05816-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Groen, Emma J. Hudecek, Jan Mulder, Lennart van Seijen, Maartje Almekinders, Mathilde M. Alexov, Stoyan Kovács, Anikó Ryska, Ales Varga, Zsuzsanna Andreu Navarro, Francisco-Javier Bianchi, Simonetta Vreuls, Willem Balslev, Eva Boot, Max V. Kulka, Janina Chmielik, Ewa Barbé, Ellis de Rooij, Mathilda J. Vos, Winand Farkas, Andrea Leeuwis-Fedorovich, Natalja E. Regitnig, Peter Westenend, Pieter J. Kooreman, Loes F. S. Quinn, Cecily Floris, Giuseppe Cserni, Gábor van Diest, Paul J. Lips, Esther H. Schaapveld, Michael Wesseling, Jelle Prognostic value of histopathological DCIS features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study |
title | Prognostic value of histopathological DCIS features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study |
title_full | Prognostic value of histopathological DCIS features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study |
title_fullStr | Prognostic value of histopathological DCIS features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic value of histopathological DCIS features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study |
title_short | Prognostic value of histopathological DCIS features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study |
title_sort | prognostic value of histopathological dcis features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32734520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05816-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT groenemmaj prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT hudecekjan prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT mulderlennart prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT vanseijenmaartje prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT almekindersmathildem prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT alexovstoyan prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT kovacsaniko prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT ryskaales prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT vargazsuzsanna prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT andreunavarrofranciscojavier prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT bianchisimonetta prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT vreulswillem prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT balsleveva prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT bootmaxv prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT kulkajanina prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT chmielikewa prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT barbeellis prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT derooijmathildaj prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT voswinand prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT farkasandrea prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT leeuwisfedorovichnataljae prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT regitnigpeter prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT westenendpieterj prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT kooremanloesfs prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT quinncecily prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT florisgiuseppe prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT csernigabor prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT vandiestpaulj prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT lipsestherh prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT schaapveldmichael prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT wesselingjelle prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy AT prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy |