Cargando…

Prognostic value of histopathological DCIS features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study

PURPOSE: For optimal management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), reproducible histopathological assessment is essential to distinguish low-risk from high-risk DCIS. Therefore, we analyzed interrater reliability of histopathological DCIS features and assessed their associations with subsequent ips...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Groen, Emma J., Hudecek, Jan, Mulder, Lennart, van Seijen, Maartje, Almekinders, Mathilde M., Alexov, Stoyan, Kovács, Anikó, Ryska, Ales, Varga, Zsuzsanna, Andreu Navarro, Francisco-Javier, Bianchi, Simonetta, Vreuls, Willem, Balslev, Eva, Boot, Max V., Kulka, Janina, Chmielik, Ewa, Barbé, Ellis, de Rooij, Mathilda J., Vos, Winand, Farkas, Andrea, Leeuwis-Fedorovich, Natalja E., Regitnig, Peter, Westenend, Pieter J., Kooreman, Loes F. S., Quinn, Cecily, Floris, Giuseppe, Cserni, Gábor, van Diest, Paul J., Lips, Esther H., Schaapveld, Michael, Wesseling, Jelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32734520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05816-x
_version_ 1783583369075884032
author Groen, Emma J.
Hudecek, Jan
Mulder, Lennart
van Seijen, Maartje
Almekinders, Mathilde M.
Alexov, Stoyan
Kovács, Anikó
Ryska, Ales
Varga, Zsuzsanna
Andreu Navarro, Francisco-Javier
Bianchi, Simonetta
Vreuls, Willem
Balslev, Eva
Boot, Max V.
Kulka, Janina
Chmielik, Ewa
Barbé, Ellis
de Rooij, Mathilda J.
Vos, Winand
Farkas, Andrea
Leeuwis-Fedorovich, Natalja E.
Regitnig, Peter
Westenend, Pieter J.
Kooreman, Loes F. S.
Quinn, Cecily
Floris, Giuseppe
Cserni, Gábor
van Diest, Paul J.
Lips, Esther H.
Schaapveld, Michael
Wesseling, Jelle
author_facet Groen, Emma J.
Hudecek, Jan
Mulder, Lennart
van Seijen, Maartje
Almekinders, Mathilde M.
Alexov, Stoyan
Kovács, Anikó
Ryska, Ales
Varga, Zsuzsanna
Andreu Navarro, Francisco-Javier
Bianchi, Simonetta
Vreuls, Willem
Balslev, Eva
Boot, Max V.
Kulka, Janina
Chmielik, Ewa
Barbé, Ellis
de Rooij, Mathilda J.
Vos, Winand
Farkas, Andrea
Leeuwis-Fedorovich, Natalja E.
Regitnig, Peter
Westenend, Pieter J.
Kooreman, Loes F. S.
Quinn, Cecily
Floris, Giuseppe
Cserni, Gábor
van Diest, Paul J.
Lips, Esther H.
Schaapveld, Michael
Wesseling, Jelle
author_sort Groen, Emma J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: For optimal management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), reproducible histopathological assessment is essential to distinguish low-risk from high-risk DCIS. Therefore, we analyzed interrater reliability of histopathological DCIS features and assessed their associations with subsequent ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (iIBC) risk. METHODS: Using a case-cohort design, reliability was assessed in a population-based, nationwide cohort of 2767 women with screen-detected DCIS diagnosed between 1993 and 2004, treated by breast-conserving surgery with/without radiotherapy (BCS ± RT) using Krippendorff’s alpha (KA) and Gwet’s AC2 (GAC2). Thirty-eight raters scored histopathological DCIS features including grade (2-tiered and 3-tiered), growth pattern, mitotic activity, periductal fibrosis, and lymphocytic infiltrate in 342 women. Using majority opinion-based scores for each feature, their association with subsequent iIBC risk was assessed using Cox regression. RESULTS: Interrater reliability of grade using various classifications was fair to moderate, and only substantial for grade 1 versus 2 + 3 when using GAC2 (0.78). Reliability for growth pattern (KA 0.44, GAC2 0.78), calcifications (KA 0.49, GAC2 0.70) and necrosis (KA 0.47, GAC2 0.70) was moderate using KA and substantial using GAC2; for (type of) periductal fibrosis and lymphocytic infiltrate fair to moderate estimates were found and for mitotic activity reliability was substantial using GAC2 (0.70). Only in patients treated with BCS-RT, high mitotic activity was associated with a higher iIBC risk in univariable analysis (Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.53, 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) 1.05–6.11); grade 3 versus 1 + 2 (HR 2.64, 95% CI 1.35–5.14) and a cribriform/solid versus flat epithelial atypia/clinging/(micro)papillary growth pattern (HR 3.70, 95% CI 1.34–10.23) were independently associated with a higher iIBC risk. CONCLUSIONS: Using majority opinion-based scores, DCIS grade, growth pattern, and mitotic activity are associated with iIBC risk in patients treated with BCS-RT, but interrater variability is substantial. Semi-quantitative grading, incorporating and separately evaluating nuclear pleomorphism, growth pattern, and mitotic activity, may improve the reliability and prognostic value of these features. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-020-05816-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7497690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74976902020-09-28 Prognostic value of histopathological DCIS features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study Groen, Emma J. Hudecek, Jan Mulder, Lennart van Seijen, Maartje Almekinders, Mathilde M. Alexov, Stoyan Kovács, Anikó Ryska, Ales Varga, Zsuzsanna Andreu Navarro, Francisco-Javier Bianchi, Simonetta Vreuls, Willem Balslev, Eva Boot, Max V. Kulka, Janina Chmielik, Ewa Barbé, Ellis de Rooij, Mathilda J. Vos, Winand Farkas, Andrea Leeuwis-Fedorovich, Natalja E. Regitnig, Peter Westenend, Pieter J. Kooreman, Loes F. S. Quinn, Cecily Floris, Giuseppe Cserni, Gábor van Diest, Paul J. Lips, Esther H. Schaapveld, Michael Wesseling, Jelle Breast Cancer Res Treat Epidemiology PURPOSE: For optimal management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), reproducible histopathological assessment is essential to distinguish low-risk from high-risk DCIS. Therefore, we analyzed interrater reliability of histopathological DCIS features and assessed their associations with subsequent ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (iIBC) risk. METHODS: Using a case-cohort design, reliability was assessed in a population-based, nationwide cohort of 2767 women with screen-detected DCIS diagnosed between 1993 and 2004, treated by breast-conserving surgery with/without radiotherapy (BCS ± RT) using Krippendorff’s alpha (KA) and Gwet’s AC2 (GAC2). Thirty-eight raters scored histopathological DCIS features including grade (2-tiered and 3-tiered), growth pattern, mitotic activity, periductal fibrosis, and lymphocytic infiltrate in 342 women. Using majority opinion-based scores for each feature, their association with subsequent iIBC risk was assessed using Cox regression. RESULTS: Interrater reliability of grade using various classifications was fair to moderate, and only substantial for grade 1 versus 2 + 3 when using GAC2 (0.78). Reliability for growth pattern (KA 0.44, GAC2 0.78), calcifications (KA 0.49, GAC2 0.70) and necrosis (KA 0.47, GAC2 0.70) was moderate using KA and substantial using GAC2; for (type of) periductal fibrosis and lymphocytic infiltrate fair to moderate estimates were found and for mitotic activity reliability was substantial using GAC2 (0.70). Only in patients treated with BCS-RT, high mitotic activity was associated with a higher iIBC risk in univariable analysis (Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.53, 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) 1.05–6.11); grade 3 versus 1 + 2 (HR 2.64, 95% CI 1.35–5.14) and a cribriform/solid versus flat epithelial atypia/clinging/(micro)papillary growth pattern (HR 3.70, 95% CI 1.34–10.23) were independently associated with a higher iIBC risk. CONCLUSIONS: Using majority opinion-based scores, DCIS grade, growth pattern, and mitotic activity are associated with iIBC risk in patients treated with BCS-RT, but interrater variability is substantial. Semi-quantitative grading, incorporating and separately evaluating nuclear pleomorphism, growth pattern, and mitotic activity, may improve the reliability and prognostic value of these features. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-020-05816-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-07-30 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7497690/ /pubmed/32734520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05816-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Groen, Emma J.
Hudecek, Jan
Mulder, Lennart
van Seijen, Maartje
Almekinders, Mathilde M.
Alexov, Stoyan
Kovács, Anikó
Ryska, Ales
Varga, Zsuzsanna
Andreu Navarro, Francisco-Javier
Bianchi, Simonetta
Vreuls, Willem
Balslev, Eva
Boot, Max V.
Kulka, Janina
Chmielik, Ewa
Barbé, Ellis
de Rooij, Mathilda J.
Vos, Winand
Farkas, Andrea
Leeuwis-Fedorovich, Natalja E.
Regitnig, Peter
Westenend, Pieter J.
Kooreman, Loes F. S.
Quinn, Cecily
Floris, Giuseppe
Cserni, Gábor
van Diest, Paul J.
Lips, Esther H.
Schaapveld, Michael
Wesseling, Jelle
Prognostic value of histopathological DCIS features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study
title Prognostic value of histopathological DCIS features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study
title_full Prognostic value of histopathological DCIS features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study
title_fullStr Prognostic value of histopathological DCIS features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of histopathological DCIS features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study
title_short Prognostic value of histopathological DCIS features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study
title_sort prognostic value of histopathological dcis features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32734520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05816-x
work_keys_str_mv AT groenemmaj prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT hudecekjan prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT mulderlennart prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT vanseijenmaartje prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT almekindersmathildem prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT alexovstoyan prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT kovacsaniko prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT ryskaales prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT vargazsuzsanna prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT andreunavarrofranciscojavier prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT bianchisimonetta prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT vreulswillem prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT balsleveva prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT bootmaxv prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT kulkajanina prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT chmielikewa prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT barbeellis prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT derooijmathildaj prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT voswinand prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT farkasandrea prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT leeuwisfedorovichnataljae prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT regitnigpeter prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT westenendpieterj prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT kooremanloesfs prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT quinncecily prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT florisgiuseppe prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT csernigabor prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT vandiestpaulj prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT lipsestherh prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT schaapveldmichael prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT wesselingjelle prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy
AT prognosticvalueofhistopathologicaldcisfeaturesinalargescaleinternationalinterraterreliabilitystudy