Cargando…

Intraoperative Observational Real-time Electrocochleography as a Predictor of Hearing Loss After Cochlear Implantation: 3 and 12 Month Outcomes

OBJECTIVE: A decrease in intracochlear electrocochleographic (ECochG) amplitude during cochlear implantation has been associated with poorer postoperative hearing preservation in several short-term studies. Here, we relate the stability of ECochG during surgery to hearing preservation at 3- and 12-m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Leary, Stephen, Briggs, Robert, Gerard, Jean-Marc, Iseli, Claire, Wei, Benjamin P.C., Tari, Sylvia, Rousset, Alex, Bester, Christo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32925842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002773
_version_ 1783583401754755072
author O’Leary, Stephen
Briggs, Robert
Gerard, Jean-Marc
Iseli, Claire
Wei, Benjamin P.C.
Tari, Sylvia
Rousset, Alex
Bester, Christo
author_facet O’Leary, Stephen
Briggs, Robert
Gerard, Jean-Marc
Iseli, Claire
Wei, Benjamin P.C.
Tari, Sylvia
Rousset, Alex
Bester, Christo
author_sort O’Leary, Stephen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: A decrease in intracochlear electrocochleographic (ECochG) amplitude during cochlear implantation has been associated with poorer postoperative hearing preservation in several short-term studies. Here, we relate the stability of ECochG during surgery to hearing preservation at 3- and 12-months. METHODS: Patients with hearing ≤80-dB HL at 500 Hz were implanted with a slim-straight electrode array. ECochG responses to short, high-intensity, 500-Hz pure tones of alternating polarity were recorded continuously from the apical-most electrode during implantation. No feedback was provided to the surgeon. ECochG amplitude was derived from the difference response, and implantations classified by the presence (“ECochG drop”) or absence (“no drop”) of a ≥30% reduction in ECochG amplitude during insertion. Residual hearing (relative and absolute) was reported against the ECochG class. RESULTS: ECochG was recorded from 109 patients. Of these, interpretable ECochG signals were recorded from 95. Sixty-six of 95 patients had an ECochG drop during implantation. Patients with an ECochG drop had poorer preoperative hearing above 1000 Hz. Hearing preservation (in decibels, relative to preoperative levels and functionally) was significantly poorer at 250-, 500-, and 1000-Hz at 3 months in patients exhibiting an ECochG drop. Twelve-month outcomes were available from 85 patients, with significantly poorer functional hearing, and greater relative and absolute hearing loss from 250 to 1000 Hz, when an ECochG drop had been encountered. CONCLUSION: Patients exhibiting ECochG drops during implantation had significantly poorer hearing preservation 12 months later. These observational outcomes support the future development of surgical interventions responsive to real-time intracochlear ECochG. Early intervention to an ECochG drop could potentially lead to prolonged improvements in hearing preservation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7497893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74978932020-09-24 Intraoperative Observational Real-time Electrocochleography as a Predictor of Hearing Loss After Cochlear Implantation: 3 and 12 Month Outcomes O’Leary, Stephen Briggs, Robert Gerard, Jean-Marc Iseli, Claire Wei, Benjamin P.C. Tari, Sylvia Rousset, Alex Bester, Christo Otol Neurotol Cochlear Implants OBJECTIVE: A decrease in intracochlear electrocochleographic (ECochG) amplitude during cochlear implantation has been associated with poorer postoperative hearing preservation in several short-term studies. Here, we relate the stability of ECochG during surgery to hearing preservation at 3- and 12-months. METHODS: Patients with hearing ≤80-dB HL at 500 Hz were implanted with a slim-straight electrode array. ECochG responses to short, high-intensity, 500-Hz pure tones of alternating polarity were recorded continuously from the apical-most electrode during implantation. No feedback was provided to the surgeon. ECochG amplitude was derived from the difference response, and implantations classified by the presence (“ECochG drop”) or absence (“no drop”) of a ≥30% reduction in ECochG amplitude during insertion. Residual hearing (relative and absolute) was reported against the ECochG class. RESULTS: ECochG was recorded from 109 patients. Of these, interpretable ECochG signals were recorded from 95. Sixty-six of 95 patients had an ECochG drop during implantation. Patients with an ECochG drop had poorer preoperative hearing above 1000 Hz. Hearing preservation (in decibels, relative to preoperative levels and functionally) was significantly poorer at 250-, 500-, and 1000-Hz at 3 months in patients exhibiting an ECochG drop. Twelve-month outcomes were available from 85 patients, with significantly poorer functional hearing, and greater relative and absolute hearing loss from 250 to 1000 Hz, when an ECochG drop had been encountered. CONCLUSION: Patients exhibiting ECochG drops during implantation had significantly poorer hearing preservation 12 months later. These observational outcomes support the future development of surgical interventions responsive to real-time intracochlear ECochG. Early intervention to an ECochG drop could potentially lead to prolonged improvements in hearing preservation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-10 2020-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7497893/ /pubmed/32925842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002773 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of Otology & Neurotology, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Cochlear Implants
O’Leary, Stephen
Briggs, Robert
Gerard, Jean-Marc
Iseli, Claire
Wei, Benjamin P.C.
Tari, Sylvia
Rousset, Alex
Bester, Christo
Intraoperative Observational Real-time Electrocochleography as a Predictor of Hearing Loss After Cochlear Implantation: 3 and 12 Month Outcomes
title Intraoperative Observational Real-time Electrocochleography as a Predictor of Hearing Loss After Cochlear Implantation: 3 and 12 Month Outcomes
title_full Intraoperative Observational Real-time Electrocochleography as a Predictor of Hearing Loss After Cochlear Implantation: 3 and 12 Month Outcomes
title_fullStr Intraoperative Observational Real-time Electrocochleography as a Predictor of Hearing Loss After Cochlear Implantation: 3 and 12 Month Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative Observational Real-time Electrocochleography as a Predictor of Hearing Loss After Cochlear Implantation: 3 and 12 Month Outcomes
title_short Intraoperative Observational Real-time Electrocochleography as a Predictor of Hearing Loss After Cochlear Implantation: 3 and 12 Month Outcomes
title_sort intraoperative observational real-time electrocochleography as a predictor of hearing loss after cochlear implantation: 3 and 12 month outcomes
topic Cochlear Implants
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32925842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002773
work_keys_str_mv AT olearystephen intraoperativeobservationalrealtimeelectrocochleographyasapredictorofhearinglossaftercochlearimplantation3and12monthoutcomes
AT briggsrobert intraoperativeobservationalrealtimeelectrocochleographyasapredictorofhearinglossaftercochlearimplantation3and12monthoutcomes
AT gerardjeanmarc intraoperativeobservationalrealtimeelectrocochleographyasapredictorofhearinglossaftercochlearimplantation3and12monthoutcomes
AT iseliclaire intraoperativeobservationalrealtimeelectrocochleographyasapredictorofhearinglossaftercochlearimplantation3and12monthoutcomes
AT weibenjaminpc intraoperativeobservationalrealtimeelectrocochleographyasapredictorofhearinglossaftercochlearimplantation3and12monthoutcomes
AT tarisylvia intraoperativeobservationalrealtimeelectrocochleographyasapredictorofhearinglossaftercochlearimplantation3and12monthoutcomes
AT roussetalex intraoperativeobservationalrealtimeelectrocochleographyasapredictorofhearinglossaftercochlearimplantation3and12monthoutcomes
AT besterchristo intraoperativeobservationalrealtimeelectrocochleographyasapredictorofhearinglossaftercochlearimplantation3and12monthoutcomes