Cargando…
Commissioning a four‐dimensional Computed Tomography Simulator for minimum target size due to motion in the Anterior–Posterior direction: a procedure and treatment planning recommendations
The purpose of this work is to develop a procedure for commissioning four‐dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) algorithms for minimum target reconstruction size, to quantify the effect of anterior–posterior (AP) motion artifacts on known object reconstruction for periodic and irregular breathing p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32667132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12980 |
_version_ | 1783583405072449536 |
---|---|
author | Sonier, Marcus Vangenderen, Brandon Visagie, Dallas Appeldoorn, Cameron Chiang, Te‐Chih (Archie) Mathew, Lindsay Reinsberg, Stefan Rose, Jim Ramaseshan, Ramani |
author_facet | Sonier, Marcus Vangenderen, Brandon Visagie, Dallas Appeldoorn, Cameron Chiang, Te‐Chih (Archie) Mathew, Lindsay Reinsberg, Stefan Rose, Jim Ramaseshan, Ramani |
author_sort | Sonier, Marcus |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this work is to develop a procedure for commissioning four‐dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) algorithms for minimum target reconstruction size, to quantify the effect of anterior–posterior (AP) motion artifacts on known object reconstruction for periodic and irregular breathing patterns, and to provide treatment planning recommendations for target sizes below a minimum threshold. A mechanical platform enabled AP motion of a rod and lung phantom during 4DCT acquisition. Static, artifact‐free scans of the phantoms were first acquired. AP sinusoidal and patient breathing motion was applied to obtain 4DCT images. 4DCT reconstruction artifacts were assessed by measuring the apparent width and angle of the rod. Comparison of known tumor diameters and volumes between the static image parameters with the 4DCT image sets was used to quantify the extent of AP reconstruction artifact and contour deformation. Examination of the rod width, under sinusoidal motion, found it was best represented during the inhale and exhale phases for all periods and ranges of motion. From the gradient phases, the apparent width of the rod decreased with increasing amplitude and decreasing period. The rod angle appeared larger on the reconstructed images due to the presence of motion artifact. The apparent diameters of the spherical tumors on the gradient phases were larger/equivalent than the true values in the AP/LR direction, respectively, while the exhale phase consistently displayed the spheres at the approximately correct diameter. The Eclipse calculated diameter matched closely with the true diameter on the exhale phase and was found to be larger on the inhale, MIP, and Avg scans. The procedure detailed here may be used during the acceptance and commissioning period of a computed tomography simulator or retroactively when implementing a SBRT program to determine the minimum target size that can be reliably reconstructed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7497911 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74979112020-09-25 Commissioning a four‐dimensional Computed Tomography Simulator for minimum target size due to motion in the Anterior–Posterior direction: a procedure and treatment planning recommendations Sonier, Marcus Vangenderen, Brandon Visagie, Dallas Appeldoorn, Cameron Chiang, Te‐Chih (Archie) Mathew, Lindsay Reinsberg, Stefan Rose, Jim Ramaseshan, Ramani J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this work is to develop a procedure for commissioning four‐dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) algorithms for minimum target reconstruction size, to quantify the effect of anterior–posterior (AP) motion artifacts on known object reconstruction for periodic and irregular breathing patterns, and to provide treatment planning recommendations for target sizes below a minimum threshold. A mechanical platform enabled AP motion of a rod and lung phantom during 4DCT acquisition. Static, artifact‐free scans of the phantoms were first acquired. AP sinusoidal and patient breathing motion was applied to obtain 4DCT images. 4DCT reconstruction artifacts were assessed by measuring the apparent width and angle of the rod. Comparison of known tumor diameters and volumes between the static image parameters with the 4DCT image sets was used to quantify the extent of AP reconstruction artifact and contour deformation. Examination of the rod width, under sinusoidal motion, found it was best represented during the inhale and exhale phases for all periods and ranges of motion. From the gradient phases, the apparent width of the rod decreased with increasing amplitude and decreasing period. The rod angle appeared larger on the reconstructed images due to the presence of motion artifact. The apparent diameters of the spherical tumors on the gradient phases were larger/equivalent than the true values in the AP/LR direction, respectively, while the exhale phase consistently displayed the spheres at the approximately correct diameter. The Eclipse calculated diameter matched closely with the true diameter on the exhale phase and was found to be larger on the inhale, MIP, and Avg scans. The procedure detailed here may be used during the acceptance and commissioning period of a computed tomography simulator or retroactively when implementing a SBRT program to determine the minimum target size that can be reliably reconstructed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7497911/ /pubmed/32667132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12980 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Sonier, Marcus Vangenderen, Brandon Visagie, Dallas Appeldoorn, Cameron Chiang, Te‐Chih (Archie) Mathew, Lindsay Reinsberg, Stefan Rose, Jim Ramaseshan, Ramani Commissioning a four‐dimensional Computed Tomography Simulator for minimum target size due to motion in the Anterior–Posterior direction: a procedure and treatment planning recommendations |
title | Commissioning a four‐dimensional Computed Tomography Simulator for minimum target size due to motion in the Anterior–Posterior direction: a procedure and treatment planning recommendations |
title_full | Commissioning a four‐dimensional Computed Tomography Simulator for minimum target size due to motion in the Anterior–Posterior direction: a procedure and treatment planning recommendations |
title_fullStr | Commissioning a four‐dimensional Computed Tomography Simulator for minimum target size due to motion in the Anterior–Posterior direction: a procedure and treatment planning recommendations |
title_full_unstemmed | Commissioning a four‐dimensional Computed Tomography Simulator for minimum target size due to motion in the Anterior–Posterior direction: a procedure and treatment planning recommendations |
title_short | Commissioning a four‐dimensional Computed Tomography Simulator for minimum target size due to motion in the Anterior–Posterior direction: a procedure and treatment planning recommendations |
title_sort | commissioning a four‐dimensional computed tomography simulator for minimum target size due to motion in the anterior–posterior direction: a procedure and treatment planning recommendations |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32667132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12980 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soniermarcus commissioningafourdimensionalcomputedtomographysimulatorforminimumtargetsizeduetomotionintheanteriorposteriordirectionaprocedureandtreatmentplanningrecommendations AT vangenderenbrandon commissioningafourdimensionalcomputedtomographysimulatorforminimumtargetsizeduetomotionintheanteriorposteriordirectionaprocedureandtreatmentplanningrecommendations AT visagiedallas commissioningafourdimensionalcomputedtomographysimulatorforminimumtargetsizeduetomotionintheanteriorposteriordirectionaprocedureandtreatmentplanningrecommendations AT appeldoorncameron commissioningafourdimensionalcomputedtomographysimulatorforminimumtargetsizeduetomotionintheanteriorposteriordirectionaprocedureandtreatmentplanningrecommendations AT chiangtechiharchie commissioningafourdimensionalcomputedtomographysimulatorforminimumtargetsizeduetomotionintheanteriorposteriordirectionaprocedureandtreatmentplanningrecommendations AT mathewlindsay commissioningafourdimensionalcomputedtomographysimulatorforminimumtargetsizeduetomotionintheanteriorposteriordirectionaprocedureandtreatmentplanningrecommendations AT reinsbergstefan commissioningafourdimensionalcomputedtomographysimulatorforminimumtargetsizeduetomotionintheanteriorposteriordirectionaprocedureandtreatmentplanningrecommendations AT rosejim commissioningafourdimensionalcomputedtomographysimulatorforminimumtargetsizeduetomotionintheanteriorposteriordirectionaprocedureandtreatmentplanningrecommendations AT ramaseshanramani commissioningafourdimensionalcomputedtomographysimulatorforminimumtargetsizeduetomotionintheanteriorposteriordirectionaprocedureandtreatmentplanningrecommendations |