Cargando…

Commissioning a four‐dimensional Computed Tomography Simulator for minimum target size due to motion in the Anterior–Posterior direction: a procedure and treatment planning recommendations

The purpose of this work is to develop a procedure for commissioning four‐dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) algorithms for minimum target reconstruction size, to quantify the effect of anterior–posterior (AP) motion artifacts on known object reconstruction for periodic and irregular breathing p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sonier, Marcus, Vangenderen, Brandon, Visagie, Dallas, Appeldoorn, Cameron, Chiang, Te‐Chih (Archie), Mathew, Lindsay, Reinsberg, Stefan, Rose, Jim, Ramaseshan, Ramani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32667132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12980
_version_ 1783583405072449536
author Sonier, Marcus
Vangenderen, Brandon
Visagie, Dallas
Appeldoorn, Cameron
Chiang, Te‐Chih (Archie)
Mathew, Lindsay
Reinsberg, Stefan
Rose, Jim
Ramaseshan, Ramani
author_facet Sonier, Marcus
Vangenderen, Brandon
Visagie, Dallas
Appeldoorn, Cameron
Chiang, Te‐Chih (Archie)
Mathew, Lindsay
Reinsberg, Stefan
Rose, Jim
Ramaseshan, Ramani
author_sort Sonier, Marcus
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this work is to develop a procedure for commissioning four‐dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) algorithms for minimum target reconstruction size, to quantify the effect of anterior–posterior (AP) motion artifacts on known object reconstruction for periodic and irregular breathing patterns, and to provide treatment planning recommendations for target sizes below a minimum threshold. A mechanical platform enabled AP motion of a rod and lung phantom during 4DCT acquisition. Static, artifact‐free scans of the phantoms were first acquired. AP sinusoidal and patient breathing motion was applied to obtain 4DCT images. 4DCT reconstruction artifacts were assessed by measuring the apparent width and angle of the rod. Comparison of known tumor diameters and volumes between the static image parameters with the 4DCT image sets was used to quantify the extent of AP reconstruction artifact and contour deformation. Examination of the rod width, under sinusoidal motion, found it was best represented during the inhale and exhale phases for all periods and ranges of motion. From the gradient phases, the apparent width of the rod decreased with increasing amplitude and decreasing period. The rod angle appeared larger on the reconstructed images due to the presence of motion artifact. The apparent diameters of the spherical tumors on the gradient phases were larger/equivalent than the true values in the AP/LR direction, respectively, while the exhale phase consistently displayed the spheres at the approximately correct diameter. The Eclipse calculated diameter matched closely with the true diameter on the exhale phase and was found to be larger on the inhale, MIP, and Avg scans. The procedure detailed here may be used during the acceptance and commissioning period of a computed tomography simulator or retroactively when implementing a SBRT program to determine the minimum target size that can be reliably reconstructed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7497911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74979112020-09-25 Commissioning a four‐dimensional Computed Tomography Simulator for minimum target size due to motion in the Anterior–Posterior direction: a procedure and treatment planning recommendations Sonier, Marcus Vangenderen, Brandon Visagie, Dallas Appeldoorn, Cameron Chiang, Te‐Chih (Archie) Mathew, Lindsay Reinsberg, Stefan Rose, Jim Ramaseshan, Ramani J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this work is to develop a procedure for commissioning four‐dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) algorithms for minimum target reconstruction size, to quantify the effect of anterior–posterior (AP) motion artifacts on known object reconstruction for periodic and irregular breathing patterns, and to provide treatment planning recommendations for target sizes below a minimum threshold. A mechanical platform enabled AP motion of a rod and lung phantom during 4DCT acquisition. Static, artifact‐free scans of the phantoms were first acquired. AP sinusoidal and patient breathing motion was applied to obtain 4DCT images. 4DCT reconstruction artifacts were assessed by measuring the apparent width and angle of the rod. Comparison of known tumor diameters and volumes between the static image parameters with the 4DCT image sets was used to quantify the extent of AP reconstruction artifact and contour deformation. Examination of the rod width, under sinusoidal motion, found it was best represented during the inhale and exhale phases for all periods and ranges of motion. From the gradient phases, the apparent width of the rod decreased with increasing amplitude and decreasing period. The rod angle appeared larger on the reconstructed images due to the presence of motion artifact. The apparent diameters of the spherical tumors on the gradient phases were larger/equivalent than the true values in the AP/LR direction, respectively, while the exhale phase consistently displayed the spheres at the approximately correct diameter. The Eclipse calculated diameter matched closely with the true diameter on the exhale phase and was found to be larger on the inhale, MIP, and Avg scans. The procedure detailed here may be used during the acceptance and commissioning period of a computed tomography simulator or retroactively when implementing a SBRT program to determine the minimum target size that can be reliably reconstructed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7497911/ /pubmed/32667132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12980 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Sonier, Marcus
Vangenderen, Brandon
Visagie, Dallas
Appeldoorn, Cameron
Chiang, Te‐Chih (Archie)
Mathew, Lindsay
Reinsberg, Stefan
Rose, Jim
Ramaseshan, Ramani
Commissioning a four‐dimensional Computed Tomography Simulator for minimum target size due to motion in the Anterior–Posterior direction: a procedure and treatment planning recommendations
title Commissioning a four‐dimensional Computed Tomography Simulator for minimum target size due to motion in the Anterior–Posterior direction: a procedure and treatment planning recommendations
title_full Commissioning a four‐dimensional Computed Tomography Simulator for minimum target size due to motion in the Anterior–Posterior direction: a procedure and treatment planning recommendations
title_fullStr Commissioning a four‐dimensional Computed Tomography Simulator for minimum target size due to motion in the Anterior–Posterior direction: a procedure and treatment planning recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Commissioning a four‐dimensional Computed Tomography Simulator for minimum target size due to motion in the Anterior–Posterior direction: a procedure and treatment planning recommendations
title_short Commissioning a four‐dimensional Computed Tomography Simulator for minimum target size due to motion in the Anterior–Posterior direction: a procedure and treatment planning recommendations
title_sort commissioning a four‐dimensional computed tomography simulator for minimum target size due to motion in the anterior–posterior direction: a procedure and treatment planning recommendations
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32667132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12980
work_keys_str_mv AT soniermarcus commissioningafourdimensionalcomputedtomographysimulatorforminimumtargetsizeduetomotionintheanteriorposteriordirectionaprocedureandtreatmentplanningrecommendations
AT vangenderenbrandon commissioningafourdimensionalcomputedtomographysimulatorforminimumtargetsizeduetomotionintheanteriorposteriordirectionaprocedureandtreatmentplanningrecommendations
AT visagiedallas commissioningafourdimensionalcomputedtomographysimulatorforminimumtargetsizeduetomotionintheanteriorposteriordirectionaprocedureandtreatmentplanningrecommendations
AT appeldoorncameron commissioningafourdimensionalcomputedtomographysimulatorforminimumtargetsizeduetomotionintheanteriorposteriordirectionaprocedureandtreatmentplanningrecommendations
AT chiangtechiharchie commissioningafourdimensionalcomputedtomographysimulatorforminimumtargetsizeduetomotionintheanteriorposteriordirectionaprocedureandtreatmentplanningrecommendations
AT mathewlindsay commissioningafourdimensionalcomputedtomographysimulatorforminimumtargetsizeduetomotionintheanteriorposteriordirectionaprocedureandtreatmentplanningrecommendations
AT reinsbergstefan commissioningafourdimensionalcomputedtomographysimulatorforminimumtargetsizeduetomotionintheanteriorposteriordirectionaprocedureandtreatmentplanningrecommendations
AT rosejim commissioningafourdimensionalcomputedtomographysimulatorforminimumtargetsizeduetomotionintheanteriorposteriordirectionaprocedureandtreatmentplanningrecommendations
AT ramaseshanramani commissioningafourdimensionalcomputedtomographysimulatorforminimumtargetsizeduetomotionintheanteriorposteriordirectionaprocedureandtreatmentplanningrecommendations