Cargando…

(177)Lutetium SPECT/CT: Evaluation of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to find the optimal combination of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction for (177)Lutetium ((177)Lu) SPECT/CT imaging. METHODS: Three experiments [sphere‐to‐background ratios (SBR) 50:1, 10:1, and 2:1] were performed with the NEMA Image Quality phantom fill...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huizing, Daphne M. V., Sinaasappel, Michiel, Dekker, Marien C., Stokkel, Marcel P. M., de Wit – van der Veen, Berlinda J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32790140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12991
_version_ 1783583406710325248
author Huizing, Daphne M. V.
Sinaasappel, Michiel
Dekker, Marien C.
Stokkel, Marcel P. M.
de Wit – van der Veen, Berlinda J.
author_facet Huizing, Daphne M. V.
Sinaasappel, Michiel
Dekker, Marien C.
Stokkel, Marcel P. M.
de Wit – van der Veen, Berlinda J.
author_sort Huizing, Daphne M. V.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to find the optimal combination of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction for (177)Lutetium ((177)Lu) SPECT/CT imaging. METHODS: Three experiments [sphere‐to‐background ratios (SBR) 50:1, 10:1, and 2:1] were performed with the NEMA Image Quality phantom filled with (177)Lu‐trichloride. SPECT/CT acquisitions were performed with the medium‐energy low‐penetration (MELP) collimator and (99m)Tc/Krypton collimator. For each acquisition six reconstructions, all with attenuation correction (AC), were made: the 113‐keV photopeak only, the 208‐keV photopeak only and both photopeaks combined, each with or without scatter correction (SC). Image quality was assessed using contrast‐to‐noise ratios (CNR), quantification accuracy by means of recovery coefficients (RCs) and the spatial resolution using line profiles. RESULTS: With SBR 50:1 and 10:1, both collimators met the Rose criterion (CNR > 5), whereas the MELP collimator showed a higher CNR for the 2:1 ratio. The RC(mean) was higher with the MELP collimator, most explicit after the 208‐keV AC/SC reconstruction for all acquisitions. The line profiles showed a better spatial resolution for the MELP collimator and the 208‐keV AC/SC reconstructions. CONCLUSION: (177)Lu SPECT/CT image quality and quantification was most optimal when acquired with the MELP collimator and reconstructed using the 208‐keV photopeak, with AC and SC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7497918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74979182020-09-25 (177)Lutetium SPECT/CT: Evaluation of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction Huizing, Daphne M. V. Sinaasappel, Michiel Dekker, Marien C. Stokkel, Marcel P. M. de Wit – van der Veen, Berlinda J. J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to find the optimal combination of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction for (177)Lutetium ((177)Lu) SPECT/CT imaging. METHODS: Three experiments [sphere‐to‐background ratios (SBR) 50:1, 10:1, and 2:1] were performed with the NEMA Image Quality phantom filled with (177)Lu‐trichloride. SPECT/CT acquisitions were performed with the medium‐energy low‐penetration (MELP) collimator and (99m)Tc/Krypton collimator. For each acquisition six reconstructions, all with attenuation correction (AC), were made: the 113‐keV photopeak only, the 208‐keV photopeak only and both photopeaks combined, each with or without scatter correction (SC). Image quality was assessed using contrast‐to‐noise ratios (CNR), quantification accuracy by means of recovery coefficients (RCs) and the spatial resolution using line profiles. RESULTS: With SBR 50:1 and 10:1, both collimators met the Rose criterion (CNR > 5), whereas the MELP collimator showed a higher CNR for the 2:1 ratio. The RC(mean) was higher with the MELP collimator, most explicit after the 208‐keV AC/SC reconstruction for all acquisitions. The line profiles showed a better spatial resolution for the MELP collimator and the 208‐keV AC/SC reconstructions. CONCLUSION: (177)Lu SPECT/CT image quality and quantification was most optimal when acquired with the MELP collimator and reconstructed using the 208‐keV photopeak, with AC and SC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7497918/ /pubmed/32790140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12991 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Huizing, Daphne M. V.
Sinaasappel, Michiel
Dekker, Marien C.
Stokkel, Marcel P. M.
de Wit – van der Veen, Berlinda J.
(177)Lutetium SPECT/CT: Evaluation of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction
title (177)Lutetium SPECT/CT: Evaluation of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction
title_full (177)Lutetium SPECT/CT: Evaluation of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction
title_fullStr (177)Lutetium SPECT/CT: Evaluation of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction
title_full_unstemmed (177)Lutetium SPECT/CT: Evaluation of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction
title_short (177)Lutetium SPECT/CT: Evaluation of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction
title_sort (177)lutetium spect/ct: evaluation of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32790140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12991
work_keys_str_mv AT huizingdaphnemv 177lutetiumspectctevaluationofcollimatorphotopeakandscattercorrection
AT sinaasappelmichiel 177lutetiumspectctevaluationofcollimatorphotopeakandscattercorrection
AT dekkermarienc 177lutetiumspectctevaluationofcollimatorphotopeakandscattercorrection
AT stokkelmarcelpm 177lutetiumspectctevaluationofcollimatorphotopeakandscattercorrection
AT dewitvanderveenberlindaj 177lutetiumspectctevaluationofcollimatorphotopeakandscattercorrection