Cargando…
(177)Lutetium SPECT/CT: Evaluation of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction
PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to find the optimal combination of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction for (177)Lutetium ((177)Lu) SPECT/CT imaging. METHODS: Three experiments [sphere‐to‐background ratios (SBR) 50:1, 10:1, and 2:1] were performed with the NEMA Image Quality phantom fill...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32790140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12991 |
_version_ | 1783583406710325248 |
---|---|
author | Huizing, Daphne M. V. Sinaasappel, Michiel Dekker, Marien C. Stokkel, Marcel P. M. de Wit – van der Veen, Berlinda J. |
author_facet | Huizing, Daphne M. V. Sinaasappel, Michiel Dekker, Marien C. Stokkel, Marcel P. M. de Wit – van der Veen, Berlinda J. |
author_sort | Huizing, Daphne M. V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to find the optimal combination of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction for (177)Lutetium ((177)Lu) SPECT/CT imaging. METHODS: Three experiments [sphere‐to‐background ratios (SBR) 50:1, 10:1, and 2:1] were performed with the NEMA Image Quality phantom filled with (177)Lu‐trichloride. SPECT/CT acquisitions were performed with the medium‐energy low‐penetration (MELP) collimator and (99m)Tc/Krypton collimator. For each acquisition six reconstructions, all with attenuation correction (AC), were made: the 113‐keV photopeak only, the 208‐keV photopeak only and both photopeaks combined, each with or without scatter correction (SC). Image quality was assessed using contrast‐to‐noise ratios (CNR), quantification accuracy by means of recovery coefficients (RCs) and the spatial resolution using line profiles. RESULTS: With SBR 50:1 and 10:1, both collimators met the Rose criterion (CNR > 5), whereas the MELP collimator showed a higher CNR for the 2:1 ratio. The RC(mean) was higher with the MELP collimator, most explicit after the 208‐keV AC/SC reconstruction for all acquisitions. The line profiles showed a better spatial resolution for the MELP collimator and the 208‐keV AC/SC reconstructions. CONCLUSION: (177)Lu SPECT/CT image quality and quantification was most optimal when acquired with the MELP collimator and reconstructed using the 208‐keV photopeak, with AC and SC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7497918 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74979182020-09-25 (177)Lutetium SPECT/CT: Evaluation of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction Huizing, Daphne M. V. Sinaasappel, Michiel Dekker, Marien C. Stokkel, Marcel P. M. de Wit – van der Veen, Berlinda J. J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to find the optimal combination of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction for (177)Lutetium ((177)Lu) SPECT/CT imaging. METHODS: Three experiments [sphere‐to‐background ratios (SBR) 50:1, 10:1, and 2:1] were performed with the NEMA Image Quality phantom filled with (177)Lu‐trichloride. SPECT/CT acquisitions were performed with the medium‐energy low‐penetration (MELP) collimator and (99m)Tc/Krypton collimator. For each acquisition six reconstructions, all with attenuation correction (AC), were made: the 113‐keV photopeak only, the 208‐keV photopeak only and both photopeaks combined, each with or without scatter correction (SC). Image quality was assessed using contrast‐to‐noise ratios (CNR), quantification accuracy by means of recovery coefficients (RCs) and the spatial resolution using line profiles. RESULTS: With SBR 50:1 and 10:1, both collimators met the Rose criterion (CNR > 5), whereas the MELP collimator showed a higher CNR for the 2:1 ratio. The RC(mean) was higher with the MELP collimator, most explicit after the 208‐keV AC/SC reconstruction for all acquisitions. The line profiles showed a better spatial resolution for the MELP collimator and the 208‐keV AC/SC reconstructions. CONCLUSION: (177)Lu SPECT/CT image quality and quantification was most optimal when acquired with the MELP collimator and reconstructed using the 208‐keV photopeak, with AC and SC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7497918/ /pubmed/32790140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12991 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Notes Huizing, Daphne M. V. Sinaasappel, Michiel Dekker, Marien C. Stokkel, Marcel P. M. de Wit – van der Veen, Berlinda J. (177)Lutetium SPECT/CT: Evaluation of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction |
title |
(177)Lutetium SPECT/CT: Evaluation of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction |
title_full |
(177)Lutetium SPECT/CT: Evaluation of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction |
title_fullStr |
(177)Lutetium SPECT/CT: Evaluation of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction |
title_full_unstemmed |
(177)Lutetium SPECT/CT: Evaluation of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction |
title_short |
(177)Lutetium SPECT/CT: Evaluation of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction |
title_sort | (177)lutetium spect/ct: evaluation of collimator, photopeak and scatter correction |
topic | Technical Notes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32790140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12991 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huizingdaphnemv 177lutetiumspectctevaluationofcollimatorphotopeakandscattercorrection AT sinaasappelmichiel 177lutetiumspectctevaluationofcollimatorphotopeakandscattercorrection AT dekkermarienc 177lutetiumspectctevaluationofcollimatorphotopeakandscattercorrection AT stokkelmarcelpm 177lutetiumspectctevaluationofcollimatorphotopeakandscattercorrection AT dewitvanderveenberlindaj 177lutetiumspectctevaluationofcollimatorphotopeakandscattercorrection |