Cargando…

Dosimetric comparison of TomoDirect, helical tomotherapy, and volumetric modulated arc therapy for postmastectomy treatment

PURPOSE: To compare dose to the targets and organs at risk (OARs) in different situations for postmastectomy patients who require radiation to the chest wall with or without regional nodal irradiation when using three treatment techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty postmastectomy radiotherapy (P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nobnop, Wannapha, Phakoetsuk, Panchalee, Chitapanarux, Imjai, Tippanya, Damrongsak, Khamchompoo, Darat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32715634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12989
_version_ 1783583410312183808
author Nobnop, Wannapha
Phakoetsuk, Panchalee
Chitapanarux, Imjai
Tippanya, Damrongsak
Khamchompoo, Darat
author_facet Nobnop, Wannapha
Phakoetsuk, Panchalee
Chitapanarux, Imjai
Tippanya, Damrongsak
Khamchompoo, Darat
author_sort Nobnop, Wannapha
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare dose to the targets and organs at risk (OARs) in different situations for postmastectomy patients who require radiation to the chest wall with or without regional nodal irradiation when using three treatment techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) patients previously treated by helical tomotherapy (HT) at our institution were identified for the study. The treatment targets were classified in three situations which consisted of, the chest wall (CW) only, the chest wall plus supraclavicular lymph nodes (CW + SPC), and the chest wall plus supraclavicular and whole axillary lymph nodes irradiation (CW + SPC+AXLN). The volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans and Tomodirect (TD) plans were created for each patient and compared with HT treatment plans which had been treated. The target coverage, dose homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), and dose to OARs were analyzed. The quality scores were used to evaluate the appropriate technique for each situation from multiparameter results. RESULTS: The HT and VMAT plans showed the advantage of target coverage and OARs sparing for the chest wall with regional nodal irradiation with the higher plan quality scores when compared with TD plans. However, TD plans demonstrated superiority to contralateral breast sparing for the chest wall without regional nodal situation reaching the highest of planned quality scores. HT plans showed better HI, CI, and target coverage (P < 0.01) than TD and VMAT plans for all patient situations. Volumetric modulated arc therapy plans generated better contralateral breast and heart sparing at a lower dose than HT. CONCLUSION: The arc‐based techniques, HT and VMAT plans, provided an advantage for complex targets in terms of target coverage and OARs sparing. However, the static beam TD plan was superior for contralateral organ sparing meanwhile achieving good target coverage for the chest wall without regional node situations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7497934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74979342020-09-25 Dosimetric comparison of TomoDirect, helical tomotherapy, and volumetric modulated arc therapy for postmastectomy treatment Nobnop, Wannapha Phakoetsuk, Panchalee Chitapanarux, Imjai Tippanya, Damrongsak Khamchompoo, Darat J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To compare dose to the targets and organs at risk (OARs) in different situations for postmastectomy patients who require radiation to the chest wall with or without regional nodal irradiation when using three treatment techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) patients previously treated by helical tomotherapy (HT) at our institution were identified for the study. The treatment targets were classified in three situations which consisted of, the chest wall (CW) only, the chest wall plus supraclavicular lymph nodes (CW + SPC), and the chest wall plus supraclavicular and whole axillary lymph nodes irradiation (CW + SPC+AXLN). The volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans and Tomodirect (TD) plans were created for each patient and compared with HT treatment plans which had been treated. The target coverage, dose homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), and dose to OARs were analyzed. The quality scores were used to evaluate the appropriate technique for each situation from multiparameter results. RESULTS: The HT and VMAT plans showed the advantage of target coverage and OARs sparing for the chest wall with regional nodal irradiation with the higher plan quality scores when compared with TD plans. However, TD plans demonstrated superiority to contralateral breast sparing for the chest wall without regional nodal situation reaching the highest of planned quality scores. HT plans showed better HI, CI, and target coverage (P < 0.01) than TD and VMAT plans for all patient situations. Volumetric modulated arc therapy plans generated better contralateral breast and heart sparing at a lower dose than HT. CONCLUSION: The arc‐based techniques, HT and VMAT plans, provided an advantage for complex targets in terms of target coverage and OARs sparing. However, the static beam TD plan was superior for contralateral organ sparing meanwhile achieving good target coverage for the chest wall without regional node situations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7497934/ /pubmed/32715634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12989 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Nobnop, Wannapha
Phakoetsuk, Panchalee
Chitapanarux, Imjai
Tippanya, Damrongsak
Khamchompoo, Darat
Dosimetric comparison of TomoDirect, helical tomotherapy, and volumetric modulated arc therapy for postmastectomy treatment
title Dosimetric comparison of TomoDirect, helical tomotherapy, and volumetric modulated arc therapy for postmastectomy treatment
title_full Dosimetric comparison of TomoDirect, helical tomotherapy, and volumetric modulated arc therapy for postmastectomy treatment
title_fullStr Dosimetric comparison of TomoDirect, helical tomotherapy, and volumetric modulated arc therapy for postmastectomy treatment
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric comparison of TomoDirect, helical tomotherapy, and volumetric modulated arc therapy for postmastectomy treatment
title_short Dosimetric comparison of TomoDirect, helical tomotherapy, and volumetric modulated arc therapy for postmastectomy treatment
title_sort dosimetric comparison of tomodirect, helical tomotherapy, and volumetric modulated arc therapy for postmastectomy treatment
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32715634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12989
work_keys_str_mv AT nobnopwannapha dosimetriccomparisonoftomodirecthelicaltomotherapyandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforpostmastectomytreatment
AT phakoetsukpanchalee dosimetriccomparisonoftomodirecthelicaltomotherapyandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforpostmastectomytreatment
AT chitapanaruximjai dosimetriccomparisonoftomodirecthelicaltomotherapyandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforpostmastectomytreatment
AT tippanyadamrongsak dosimetriccomparisonoftomodirecthelicaltomotherapyandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforpostmastectomytreatment
AT khamchompoodarat dosimetriccomparisonoftomodirecthelicaltomotherapyandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforpostmastectomytreatment