Cargando…
Prioritization of patient safety health policies: Delphi survey using patient safety experts in Japan
Various patient safety interventions have been implemented since the late 1990s, but their evaluation has been lacking. To obtain basic information for prioritizing patient safety interventions, this study aimed to extract high-priority interventions in Japan and to identify the factors that influen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32941481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239179 |
_version_ | 1783583412011925504 |
---|---|
author | Hatakeyama, Yosuke Fujita, Shigeru Iida, Shuhei Nagai, Yoji Shimamori, Yoshiko Ayuzawa, Junko Hirao, Tomohiro Onishi, Ryo Seto, Kanako Matsumoto, Kunichika Hasegawa, Tomonori |
author_facet | Hatakeyama, Yosuke Fujita, Shigeru Iida, Shuhei Nagai, Yoji Shimamori, Yoshiko Ayuzawa, Junko Hirao, Tomohiro Onishi, Ryo Seto, Kanako Matsumoto, Kunichika Hasegawa, Tomonori |
author_sort | Hatakeyama, Yosuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Various patient safety interventions have been implemented since the late 1990s, but their evaluation has been lacking. To obtain basic information for prioritizing patient safety interventions, this study aimed to extract high-priority interventions in Japan and to identify the factors that influence the setting of priority. Six perspectives (contribution, dissemination, impact, cost, urgency, and priority) on 42 patient safety interventions classified into 3 levels (system, organizational, and clinical) were evaluated by Japanese experts using the Delphi technique. We examined the relationships of the levels and the perspectives on interventions with the transition of the consensus state in rounds 1 and 3. After extracting the high-priority interventions, a chi-squared test was used to examine the relationship of the levels and the impact/cost ratio with high priority. Regression models were used to examine the influence of each perspective on priority. There was a significant relationship between the level of interventions and the transition of the consensus state (p = 0.033). System-level interventions had a low probability of achieving consensus. “Human resources interventions,” “professional education and training,” “medication management/reconciliation protocols,” “pay-for performance (P4P) schemes and financing for safety,” “digital technology solutions to improve safety,” and “hand hygiene initiatives” were extracted as high-priority interventions. The level and the impact/cost ratio of interventions had no significant relationships with high priority. In the regression model, dissemination and impact had an influence on priority (β = -0.628 and 0.941, respectively; adjusted R-squared = 0.646). The influence of impact and dissemination on the priority of interventions suggests that it is important to examine the dissemination degree and impact of interventions in each country for prioritizing interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7497979 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74979792020-09-24 Prioritization of patient safety health policies: Delphi survey using patient safety experts in Japan Hatakeyama, Yosuke Fujita, Shigeru Iida, Shuhei Nagai, Yoji Shimamori, Yoshiko Ayuzawa, Junko Hirao, Tomohiro Onishi, Ryo Seto, Kanako Matsumoto, Kunichika Hasegawa, Tomonori PLoS One Research Article Various patient safety interventions have been implemented since the late 1990s, but their evaluation has been lacking. To obtain basic information for prioritizing patient safety interventions, this study aimed to extract high-priority interventions in Japan and to identify the factors that influence the setting of priority. Six perspectives (contribution, dissemination, impact, cost, urgency, and priority) on 42 patient safety interventions classified into 3 levels (system, organizational, and clinical) were evaluated by Japanese experts using the Delphi technique. We examined the relationships of the levels and the perspectives on interventions with the transition of the consensus state in rounds 1 and 3. After extracting the high-priority interventions, a chi-squared test was used to examine the relationship of the levels and the impact/cost ratio with high priority. Regression models were used to examine the influence of each perspective on priority. There was a significant relationship between the level of interventions and the transition of the consensus state (p = 0.033). System-level interventions had a low probability of achieving consensus. “Human resources interventions,” “professional education and training,” “medication management/reconciliation protocols,” “pay-for performance (P4P) schemes and financing for safety,” “digital technology solutions to improve safety,” and “hand hygiene initiatives” were extracted as high-priority interventions. The level and the impact/cost ratio of interventions had no significant relationships with high priority. In the regression model, dissemination and impact had an influence on priority (β = -0.628 and 0.941, respectively; adjusted R-squared = 0.646). The influence of impact and dissemination on the priority of interventions suggests that it is important to examine the dissemination degree and impact of interventions in each country for prioritizing interventions. Public Library of Science 2020-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7497979/ /pubmed/32941481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239179 Text en © 2020 Hatakeyama et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hatakeyama, Yosuke Fujita, Shigeru Iida, Shuhei Nagai, Yoji Shimamori, Yoshiko Ayuzawa, Junko Hirao, Tomohiro Onishi, Ryo Seto, Kanako Matsumoto, Kunichika Hasegawa, Tomonori Prioritization of patient safety health policies: Delphi survey using patient safety experts in Japan |
title | Prioritization of patient safety health policies: Delphi survey using patient safety experts in Japan |
title_full | Prioritization of patient safety health policies: Delphi survey using patient safety experts in Japan |
title_fullStr | Prioritization of patient safety health policies: Delphi survey using patient safety experts in Japan |
title_full_unstemmed | Prioritization of patient safety health policies: Delphi survey using patient safety experts in Japan |
title_short | Prioritization of patient safety health policies: Delphi survey using patient safety experts in Japan |
title_sort | prioritization of patient safety health policies: delphi survey using patient safety experts in japan |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32941481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239179 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hatakeyamayosuke prioritizationofpatientsafetyhealthpoliciesdelphisurveyusingpatientsafetyexpertsinjapan AT fujitashigeru prioritizationofpatientsafetyhealthpoliciesdelphisurveyusingpatientsafetyexpertsinjapan AT iidashuhei prioritizationofpatientsafetyhealthpoliciesdelphisurveyusingpatientsafetyexpertsinjapan AT nagaiyoji prioritizationofpatientsafetyhealthpoliciesdelphisurveyusingpatientsafetyexpertsinjapan AT shimamoriyoshiko prioritizationofpatientsafetyhealthpoliciesdelphisurveyusingpatientsafetyexpertsinjapan AT ayuzawajunko prioritizationofpatientsafetyhealthpoliciesdelphisurveyusingpatientsafetyexpertsinjapan AT hiraotomohiro prioritizationofpatientsafetyhealthpoliciesdelphisurveyusingpatientsafetyexpertsinjapan AT onishiryo prioritizationofpatientsafetyhealthpoliciesdelphisurveyusingpatientsafetyexpertsinjapan AT setokanako prioritizationofpatientsafetyhealthpoliciesdelphisurveyusingpatientsafetyexpertsinjapan AT matsumotokunichika prioritizationofpatientsafetyhealthpoliciesdelphisurveyusingpatientsafetyexpertsinjapan AT hasegawatomonori prioritizationofpatientsafetyhealthpoliciesdelphisurveyusingpatientsafetyexpertsinjapan |