Cargando…

Prioritization of patient safety health policies: Delphi survey using patient safety experts in Japan

Various patient safety interventions have been implemented since the late 1990s, but their evaluation has been lacking. To obtain basic information for prioritizing patient safety interventions, this study aimed to extract high-priority interventions in Japan and to identify the factors that influen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hatakeyama, Yosuke, Fujita, Shigeru, Iida, Shuhei, Nagai, Yoji, Shimamori, Yoshiko, Ayuzawa, Junko, Hirao, Tomohiro, Onishi, Ryo, Seto, Kanako, Matsumoto, Kunichika, Hasegawa, Tomonori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32941481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239179
_version_ 1783583412011925504
author Hatakeyama, Yosuke
Fujita, Shigeru
Iida, Shuhei
Nagai, Yoji
Shimamori, Yoshiko
Ayuzawa, Junko
Hirao, Tomohiro
Onishi, Ryo
Seto, Kanako
Matsumoto, Kunichika
Hasegawa, Tomonori
author_facet Hatakeyama, Yosuke
Fujita, Shigeru
Iida, Shuhei
Nagai, Yoji
Shimamori, Yoshiko
Ayuzawa, Junko
Hirao, Tomohiro
Onishi, Ryo
Seto, Kanako
Matsumoto, Kunichika
Hasegawa, Tomonori
author_sort Hatakeyama, Yosuke
collection PubMed
description Various patient safety interventions have been implemented since the late 1990s, but their evaluation has been lacking. To obtain basic information for prioritizing patient safety interventions, this study aimed to extract high-priority interventions in Japan and to identify the factors that influence the setting of priority. Six perspectives (contribution, dissemination, impact, cost, urgency, and priority) on 42 patient safety interventions classified into 3 levels (system, organizational, and clinical) were evaluated by Japanese experts using the Delphi technique. We examined the relationships of the levels and the perspectives on interventions with the transition of the consensus state in rounds 1 and 3. After extracting the high-priority interventions, a chi-squared test was used to examine the relationship of the levels and the impact/cost ratio with high priority. Regression models were used to examine the influence of each perspective on priority. There was a significant relationship between the level of interventions and the transition of the consensus state (p = 0.033). System-level interventions had a low probability of achieving consensus. “Human resources interventions,” “professional education and training,” “medication management/reconciliation protocols,” “pay-for performance (P4P) schemes and financing for safety,” “digital technology solutions to improve safety,” and “hand hygiene initiatives” were extracted as high-priority interventions. The level and the impact/cost ratio of interventions had no significant relationships with high priority. In the regression model, dissemination and impact had an influence on priority (β = -0.628 and 0.941, respectively; adjusted R-squared = 0.646). The influence of impact and dissemination on the priority of interventions suggests that it is important to examine the dissemination degree and impact of interventions in each country for prioritizing interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7497979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74979792020-09-24 Prioritization of patient safety health policies: Delphi survey using patient safety experts in Japan Hatakeyama, Yosuke Fujita, Shigeru Iida, Shuhei Nagai, Yoji Shimamori, Yoshiko Ayuzawa, Junko Hirao, Tomohiro Onishi, Ryo Seto, Kanako Matsumoto, Kunichika Hasegawa, Tomonori PLoS One Research Article Various patient safety interventions have been implemented since the late 1990s, but their evaluation has been lacking. To obtain basic information for prioritizing patient safety interventions, this study aimed to extract high-priority interventions in Japan and to identify the factors that influence the setting of priority. Six perspectives (contribution, dissemination, impact, cost, urgency, and priority) on 42 patient safety interventions classified into 3 levels (system, organizational, and clinical) were evaluated by Japanese experts using the Delphi technique. We examined the relationships of the levels and the perspectives on interventions with the transition of the consensus state in rounds 1 and 3. After extracting the high-priority interventions, a chi-squared test was used to examine the relationship of the levels and the impact/cost ratio with high priority. Regression models were used to examine the influence of each perspective on priority. There was a significant relationship between the level of interventions and the transition of the consensus state (p = 0.033). System-level interventions had a low probability of achieving consensus. “Human resources interventions,” “professional education and training,” “medication management/reconciliation protocols,” “pay-for performance (P4P) schemes and financing for safety,” “digital technology solutions to improve safety,” and “hand hygiene initiatives” were extracted as high-priority interventions. The level and the impact/cost ratio of interventions had no significant relationships with high priority. In the regression model, dissemination and impact had an influence on priority (β = -0.628 and 0.941, respectively; adjusted R-squared = 0.646). The influence of impact and dissemination on the priority of interventions suggests that it is important to examine the dissemination degree and impact of interventions in each country for prioritizing interventions. Public Library of Science 2020-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7497979/ /pubmed/32941481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239179 Text en © 2020 Hatakeyama et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hatakeyama, Yosuke
Fujita, Shigeru
Iida, Shuhei
Nagai, Yoji
Shimamori, Yoshiko
Ayuzawa, Junko
Hirao, Tomohiro
Onishi, Ryo
Seto, Kanako
Matsumoto, Kunichika
Hasegawa, Tomonori
Prioritization of patient safety health policies: Delphi survey using patient safety experts in Japan
title Prioritization of patient safety health policies: Delphi survey using patient safety experts in Japan
title_full Prioritization of patient safety health policies: Delphi survey using patient safety experts in Japan
title_fullStr Prioritization of patient safety health policies: Delphi survey using patient safety experts in Japan
title_full_unstemmed Prioritization of patient safety health policies: Delphi survey using patient safety experts in Japan
title_short Prioritization of patient safety health policies: Delphi survey using patient safety experts in Japan
title_sort prioritization of patient safety health policies: delphi survey using patient safety experts in japan
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7497979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32941481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239179
work_keys_str_mv AT hatakeyamayosuke prioritizationofpatientsafetyhealthpoliciesdelphisurveyusingpatientsafetyexpertsinjapan
AT fujitashigeru prioritizationofpatientsafetyhealthpoliciesdelphisurveyusingpatientsafetyexpertsinjapan
AT iidashuhei prioritizationofpatientsafetyhealthpoliciesdelphisurveyusingpatientsafetyexpertsinjapan
AT nagaiyoji prioritizationofpatientsafetyhealthpoliciesdelphisurveyusingpatientsafetyexpertsinjapan
AT shimamoriyoshiko prioritizationofpatientsafetyhealthpoliciesdelphisurveyusingpatientsafetyexpertsinjapan
AT ayuzawajunko prioritizationofpatientsafetyhealthpoliciesdelphisurveyusingpatientsafetyexpertsinjapan
AT hiraotomohiro prioritizationofpatientsafetyhealthpoliciesdelphisurveyusingpatientsafetyexpertsinjapan
AT onishiryo prioritizationofpatientsafetyhealthpoliciesdelphisurveyusingpatientsafetyexpertsinjapan
AT setokanako prioritizationofpatientsafetyhealthpoliciesdelphisurveyusingpatientsafetyexpertsinjapan
AT matsumotokunichika prioritizationofpatientsafetyhealthpoliciesdelphisurveyusingpatientsafetyexpertsinjapan
AT hasegawatomonori prioritizationofpatientsafetyhealthpoliciesdelphisurveyusingpatientsafetyexpertsinjapan