Cargando…

Mathematical evaluation of responses to surgical stimuli under general anesthesia

Surgical invasion activates nociception, while anesthesia suppresses it. Under general anesthesia, stimulation, which is the balance between nociception and anti-nociception, induces responses, including activation of the autonomic nervous system. To evaluate the associations between stimulation (S)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ooba, Shohei, Ueki, Ryusuke, Kariya, Nobutaka, Tatara, Tsuneo, Hirose, Munetaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7499303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32943724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72307-w
_version_ 1783583686630834176
author Ooba, Shohei
Ueki, Ryusuke
Kariya, Nobutaka
Tatara, Tsuneo
Hirose, Munetaka
author_facet Ooba, Shohei
Ueki, Ryusuke
Kariya, Nobutaka
Tatara, Tsuneo
Hirose, Munetaka
author_sort Ooba, Shohei
collection PubMed
description Surgical invasion activates nociception, while anesthesia suppresses it. Under general anesthesia, stimulation, which is the balance between nociception and anti-nociception, induces responses, including activation of the autonomic nervous system. To evaluate the associations between stimulation (S) and the resultant responses (R), we examined R values, which were calculated using mathematical models of Stevens’ power law, Gompertz function and logistic function. The previously developed Nociceptive Response (NR) formula was applied as a modified logistic model. S values were calculated using a linear function in the NR formula. In a retrospective study, we developed an exponential model of Stevens’ power law and a sigmoidal model of Gompertz function using differential equations, by adjusting R values to correspond to NR values, in consecutive patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia (n = 4,395). In a subsequent prospective study, we validated the superiority of R values of Gompertz function and the NR formula in an exponential model in adult patients undergoing tympanoplasty (n = 141) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 86). In conclusion, both modified logistic function and Gompertz function are likely appropriate mathematical models for representing responses to stimulation resulting from the balance between nociception/anti-nociception during surgical procedures under general anesthesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7499303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74993032020-09-22 Mathematical evaluation of responses to surgical stimuli under general anesthesia Ooba, Shohei Ueki, Ryusuke Kariya, Nobutaka Tatara, Tsuneo Hirose, Munetaka Sci Rep Article Surgical invasion activates nociception, while anesthesia suppresses it. Under general anesthesia, stimulation, which is the balance between nociception and anti-nociception, induces responses, including activation of the autonomic nervous system. To evaluate the associations between stimulation (S) and the resultant responses (R), we examined R values, which were calculated using mathematical models of Stevens’ power law, Gompertz function and logistic function. The previously developed Nociceptive Response (NR) formula was applied as a modified logistic model. S values were calculated using a linear function in the NR formula. In a retrospective study, we developed an exponential model of Stevens’ power law and a sigmoidal model of Gompertz function using differential equations, by adjusting R values to correspond to NR values, in consecutive patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia (n = 4,395). In a subsequent prospective study, we validated the superiority of R values of Gompertz function and the NR formula in an exponential model in adult patients undergoing tympanoplasty (n = 141) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 86). In conclusion, both modified logistic function and Gompertz function are likely appropriate mathematical models for representing responses to stimulation resulting from the balance between nociception/anti-nociception during surgical procedures under general anesthesia. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7499303/ /pubmed/32943724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72307-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Ooba, Shohei
Ueki, Ryusuke
Kariya, Nobutaka
Tatara, Tsuneo
Hirose, Munetaka
Mathematical evaluation of responses to surgical stimuli under general anesthesia
title Mathematical evaluation of responses to surgical stimuli under general anesthesia
title_full Mathematical evaluation of responses to surgical stimuli under general anesthesia
title_fullStr Mathematical evaluation of responses to surgical stimuli under general anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Mathematical evaluation of responses to surgical stimuli under general anesthesia
title_short Mathematical evaluation of responses to surgical stimuli under general anesthesia
title_sort mathematical evaluation of responses to surgical stimuli under general anesthesia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7499303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32943724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72307-w
work_keys_str_mv AT oobashohei mathematicalevaluationofresponsestosurgicalstimuliundergeneralanesthesia
AT uekiryusuke mathematicalevaluationofresponsestosurgicalstimuliundergeneralanesthesia
AT kariyanobutaka mathematicalevaluationofresponsestosurgicalstimuliundergeneralanesthesia
AT tataratsuneo mathematicalevaluationofresponsestosurgicalstimuliundergeneralanesthesia
AT hirosemunetaka mathematicalevaluationofresponsestosurgicalstimuliundergeneralanesthesia