Cargando…
Is COVID-19 the end of US hegemony? Public bads, leadership failures and monetary hegemony
COVID-19 is the most invasive global crisis in the postwar era, jeopardizing all dimensions of human activity. By theorizing COVID-19 as a public bad, I shed light on one of the great debates of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries regarding the relationship between the United States and liberal...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7499638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34191870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaa134 |
_version_ | 1783583728349478912 |
---|---|
author | Norrlöf, Carla |
author_facet | Norrlöf, Carla |
author_sort | Norrlöf, Carla |
collection | PubMed |
description | COVID-19 is the most invasive global crisis in the postwar era, jeopardizing all dimensions of human activity. By theorizing COVID-19 as a public bad, I shed light on one of the great debates of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries regarding the relationship between the United States and liberal international order (LIO). Conceptualizing the pandemic as a public bad, I analyze its consequences for US hegemony. Unlike other international public bads and many of the most important public goods that make up the LIO, the COVID-19 public bad not only has some degree of rivalry but can be made partially excludable, transforming it into more of a club good. Domestically, I demonstrate how the failure to effectively manage the COVID-19 public bad has compromised America's ability to secure the health of its citizens and the domestic economy, the very foundations for its international leadership. These failures jeopardize US provision of other global public goods. Internationally, I show how the US has already used the crisis strategically to reinforce its opposition to free international movement while abandoning the primary international institution tasked with fighting the public bad, the World Health Organization (WHO). While the only area where the United States has exercised leadership is in the monetary sphere, I argue this feat is more consequential for maintaining hegemony. However, even monetary hegemony could be at risk if the pandemic continues to be mismanaged. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7499638 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74996382020-09-21 Is COVID-19 the end of US hegemony? Public bads, leadership failures and monetary hegemony Norrlöf, Carla Int Aff Articles COVID-19 is the most invasive global crisis in the postwar era, jeopardizing all dimensions of human activity. By theorizing COVID-19 as a public bad, I shed light on one of the great debates of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries regarding the relationship between the United States and liberal international order (LIO). Conceptualizing the pandemic as a public bad, I analyze its consequences for US hegemony. Unlike other international public bads and many of the most important public goods that make up the LIO, the COVID-19 public bad not only has some degree of rivalry but can be made partially excludable, transforming it into more of a club good. Domestically, I demonstrate how the failure to effectively manage the COVID-19 public bad has compromised America's ability to secure the health of its citizens and the domestic economy, the very foundations for its international leadership. These failures jeopardize US provision of other global public goods. Internationally, I show how the US has already used the crisis strategically to reinforce its opposition to free international movement while abandoning the primary international institution tasked with fighting the public bad, the World Health Organization (WHO). While the only area where the United States has exercised leadership is in the monetary sphere, I argue this feat is more consequential for maintaining hegemony. However, even monetary hegemony could be at risk if the pandemic continues to be mismanaged. Oxford University Press 2020-09 2020-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7499638/ /pubmed/34191870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaa134 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal Institute of International Affairs. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Norrlöf, Carla Is COVID-19 the end of US hegemony? Public bads, leadership failures and monetary hegemony |
title | Is COVID-19 the end of US hegemony? Public bads, leadership failures and monetary hegemony |
title_full | Is COVID-19 the end of US hegemony? Public bads, leadership failures and monetary hegemony |
title_fullStr | Is COVID-19 the end of US hegemony? Public bads, leadership failures and monetary hegemony |
title_full_unstemmed | Is COVID-19 the end of US hegemony? Public bads, leadership failures and monetary hegemony |
title_short | Is COVID-19 the end of US hegemony? Public bads, leadership failures and monetary hegemony |
title_sort | is covid-19 the end of us hegemony? public bads, leadership failures and monetary hegemony |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7499638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34191870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaa134 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT norrlofcarla iscovid19theendofushegemonypublicbadsleadershipfailuresandmonetaryhegemony |