Cargando…

Patient and healthcare professional experiences of the Salford Lung Studies: qualitative insights for future effectiveness trials

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in the routine care setting provide the opportunity to better understand the effectiveness of new medicines but can present recruitment difficulties. An improved understanding of the challenges/opportunities for patient and healthcare profess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gemzoe, Kim, Crawford, Rebecca, Caress, Ann, McCorkindale, Sheila, Conroy, Rebecca, Collier, Susan, Doward, Lynda, Vekaria, Renu M., Worsley, Sally, Leather, David A., Irving, Elaine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7499906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32943093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04655-x
_version_ 1783583759027666944
author Gemzoe, Kim
Crawford, Rebecca
Caress, Ann
McCorkindale, Sheila
Conroy, Rebecca
Collier, Susan
Doward, Lynda
Vekaria, Renu M.
Worsley, Sally
Leather, David A.
Irving, Elaine
author_facet Gemzoe, Kim
Crawford, Rebecca
Caress, Ann
McCorkindale, Sheila
Conroy, Rebecca
Collier, Susan
Doward, Lynda
Vekaria, Renu M.
Worsley, Sally
Leather, David A.
Irving, Elaine
author_sort Gemzoe, Kim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in the routine care setting provide the opportunity to better understand the effectiveness of new medicines but can present recruitment difficulties. An improved understanding of the challenges/opportunities for patient and healthcare professional (HCP) engagement in clinical research is needed to enhance participation and trial experience. In this study, we explored patient and HCP drivers for, and experiences of, participation in the Salford Lung Studies (SLS), and their views on future trial participation and the overall value of such trials. METHODS: This was a qualitative study set in Salford, UK, comprising patient telephone interviews (N = 10) and HCP advisory boards (one with general practitioners [GPs], one with practice managers [PMs]); all individuals had participated in the SLS. Semi-structured telephone interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically. Advisory board meetings were analysed based on transcriptions of audio recordings and field notes. RESULTS: For patients, key positive aspects of the SLS were the ease/convenience of study assessments and excellent relationships with study nurses. GPs and PMs considered the SLS to be well-organized and highlighted the value of research nurse support; they also described minor challenges relating to trial systems, initial financial strain on practices and staff turnover. All participants indicated that they were very likely to participate in future trials, citing a design closely aligned with routine care practice as essential. Several strategies to encourage trial participation were suggested, such as clearly communicating benefits to patients and ensuring flexible study assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and HCPs had positive experiences of the SLS. The study design, closely aligned with routine care, was considered important to their high likelihood of participating in future trials. The experiences of patients and HCPs in the SLS provide valuable insights that will help inform future best practice in the design and conduct of future real-world effectiveness RCTs in primary care. The detailed first-hand experiences of HCPs will be of significant value to others considering engaging in clinical research and participating in effectiveness RCTs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7499906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74999062020-09-21 Patient and healthcare professional experiences of the Salford Lung Studies: qualitative insights for future effectiveness trials Gemzoe, Kim Crawford, Rebecca Caress, Ann McCorkindale, Sheila Conroy, Rebecca Collier, Susan Doward, Lynda Vekaria, Renu M. Worsley, Sally Leather, David A. Irving, Elaine Trials Research BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in the routine care setting provide the opportunity to better understand the effectiveness of new medicines but can present recruitment difficulties. An improved understanding of the challenges/opportunities for patient and healthcare professional (HCP) engagement in clinical research is needed to enhance participation and trial experience. In this study, we explored patient and HCP drivers for, and experiences of, participation in the Salford Lung Studies (SLS), and their views on future trial participation and the overall value of such trials. METHODS: This was a qualitative study set in Salford, UK, comprising patient telephone interviews (N = 10) and HCP advisory boards (one with general practitioners [GPs], one with practice managers [PMs]); all individuals had participated in the SLS. Semi-structured telephone interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically. Advisory board meetings were analysed based on transcriptions of audio recordings and field notes. RESULTS: For patients, key positive aspects of the SLS were the ease/convenience of study assessments and excellent relationships with study nurses. GPs and PMs considered the SLS to be well-organized and highlighted the value of research nurse support; they also described minor challenges relating to trial systems, initial financial strain on practices and staff turnover. All participants indicated that they were very likely to participate in future trials, citing a design closely aligned with routine care practice as essential. Several strategies to encourage trial participation were suggested, such as clearly communicating benefits to patients and ensuring flexible study assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and HCPs had positive experiences of the SLS. The study design, closely aligned with routine care, was considered important to their high likelihood of participating in future trials. The experiences of patients and HCPs in the SLS provide valuable insights that will help inform future best practice in the design and conduct of future real-world effectiveness RCTs in primary care. The detailed first-hand experiences of HCPs will be of significant value to others considering engaging in clinical research and participating in effectiveness RCTs. BioMed Central 2020-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7499906/ /pubmed/32943093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04655-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gemzoe, Kim
Crawford, Rebecca
Caress, Ann
McCorkindale, Sheila
Conroy, Rebecca
Collier, Susan
Doward, Lynda
Vekaria, Renu M.
Worsley, Sally
Leather, David A.
Irving, Elaine
Patient and healthcare professional experiences of the Salford Lung Studies: qualitative insights for future effectiveness trials
title Patient and healthcare professional experiences of the Salford Lung Studies: qualitative insights for future effectiveness trials
title_full Patient and healthcare professional experiences of the Salford Lung Studies: qualitative insights for future effectiveness trials
title_fullStr Patient and healthcare professional experiences of the Salford Lung Studies: qualitative insights for future effectiveness trials
title_full_unstemmed Patient and healthcare professional experiences of the Salford Lung Studies: qualitative insights for future effectiveness trials
title_short Patient and healthcare professional experiences of the Salford Lung Studies: qualitative insights for future effectiveness trials
title_sort patient and healthcare professional experiences of the salford lung studies: qualitative insights for future effectiveness trials
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7499906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32943093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04655-x
work_keys_str_mv AT gemzoekim patientandhealthcareprofessionalexperiencesofthesalfordlungstudiesqualitativeinsightsforfutureeffectivenesstrials
AT crawfordrebecca patientandhealthcareprofessionalexperiencesofthesalfordlungstudiesqualitativeinsightsforfutureeffectivenesstrials
AT caressann patientandhealthcareprofessionalexperiencesofthesalfordlungstudiesqualitativeinsightsforfutureeffectivenesstrials
AT mccorkindalesheila patientandhealthcareprofessionalexperiencesofthesalfordlungstudiesqualitativeinsightsforfutureeffectivenesstrials
AT conroyrebecca patientandhealthcareprofessionalexperiencesofthesalfordlungstudiesqualitativeinsightsforfutureeffectivenesstrials
AT colliersusan patientandhealthcareprofessionalexperiencesofthesalfordlungstudiesqualitativeinsightsforfutureeffectivenesstrials
AT dowardlynda patientandhealthcareprofessionalexperiencesofthesalfordlungstudiesqualitativeinsightsforfutureeffectivenesstrials
AT vekariarenum patientandhealthcareprofessionalexperiencesofthesalfordlungstudiesqualitativeinsightsforfutureeffectivenesstrials
AT worsleysally patientandhealthcareprofessionalexperiencesofthesalfordlungstudiesqualitativeinsightsforfutureeffectivenesstrials
AT leatherdavida patientandhealthcareprofessionalexperiencesofthesalfordlungstudiesqualitativeinsightsforfutureeffectivenesstrials
AT irvingelaine patientandhealthcareprofessionalexperiencesofthesalfordlungstudiesqualitativeinsightsforfutureeffectivenesstrials