Cargando…
A mixed methods evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a pilot project ECHO for community health workers (CHWs)
BACKGROUND: Despite the positive effects of community health workers (CHWs) on addressing social determinants of health, improving patient health outcomes, and decreasing overall healthcare costs, there is a lack of standardization in training and certifying this workforce, resulting in different ap...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7499981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32963804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00678-y |
_version_ | 1783583774968119296 |
---|---|
author | Damian, April Joy Robinson, Sarafina Manzoor, Faaiza Lamb, Mandy Rojas, Adriana Porto, Ariel Anderson, Daren |
author_facet | Damian, April Joy Robinson, Sarafina Manzoor, Faaiza Lamb, Mandy Rojas, Adriana Porto, Ariel Anderson, Daren |
author_sort | Damian, April Joy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite the positive effects of community health workers (CHWs) on addressing social determinants of health, improving patient health outcomes, and decreasing overall healthcare costs, there is a lack of standardization in training and certifying this workforce, resulting in different approaches to integrating this role into medical home models. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the application of Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes) in enhancing CHWs’ capacity to address health and social issues of vulnerable populations. METHODS: An explanatory sequential mixed methods design was applied in which all participants (N = 49) completed pre (January 2019) and post (July 2019) quantitative online surveys measuring changes in self-efficacy, behavior change intent, and knowledge. Virtual focus groups were conducted with a subset of participants (n = 20) in July 2019 to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of Project ECHO. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference of + 0.453 in the composite self-efficacy mean score pre- to post-series. For every 1 additional Project ECHO CHW session attended, there was a .05 improvement in participants’ self-efficacy to perform CHW-related job duties and address social determinants of health (SDOH). Four major themes emerged from the qualitative focus group data: value in learning from other participants’ caseloads, CHW-care team integration, availability of training and resources, and shared decision-making with patients. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation suggests that ECHO is a viable means of increasing access to training resources for CHWs. Future studies on the ECHO model as a means of educating and broadening implementation of CHWs are warranted. Programs such as Project ECHO can support CHWs by providing continuing education opportunities, as well as standardizing training content across large geographic areas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7499981 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74999812020-09-21 A mixed methods evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a pilot project ECHO for community health workers (CHWs) Damian, April Joy Robinson, Sarafina Manzoor, Faaiza Lamb, Mandy Rojas, Adriana Porto, Ariel Anderson, Daren Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: Despite the positive effects of community health workers (CHWs) on addressing social determinants of health, improving patient health outcomes, and decreasing overall healthcare costs, there is a lack of standardization in training and certifying this workforce, resulting in different approaches to integrating this role into medical home models. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the application of Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes) in enhancing CHWs’ capacity to address health and social issues of vulnerable populations. METHODS: An explanatory sequential mixed methods design was applied in which all participants (N = 49) completed pre (January 2019) and post (July 2019) quantitative online surveys measuring changes in self-efficacy, behavior change intent, and knowledge. Virtual focus groups were conducted with a subset of participants (n = 20) in July 2019 to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of Project ECHO. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference of + 0.453 in the composite self-efficacy mean score pre- to post-series. For every 1 additional Project ECHO CHW session attended, there was a .05 improvement in participants’ self-efficacy to perform CHW-related job duties and address social determinants of health (SDOH). Four major themes emerged from the qualitative focus group data: value in learning from other participants’ caseloads, CHW-care team integration, availability of training and resources, and shared decision-making with patients. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation suggests that ECHO is a viable means of increasing access to training resources for CHWs. Future studies on the ECHO model as a means of educating and broadening implementation of CHWs are warranted. Programs such as Project ECHO can support CHWs by providing continuing education opportunities, as well as standardizing training content across large geographic areas. BioMed Central 2020-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7499981/ /pubmed/32963804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00678-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Damian, April Joy Robinson, Sarafina Manzoor, Faaiza Lamb, Mandy Rojas, Adriana Porto, Ariel Anderson, Daren A mixed methods evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a pilot project ECHO for community health workers (CHWs) |
title | A mixed methods evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a pilot project ECHO for community health workers (CHWs) |
title_full | A mixed methods evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a pilot project ECHO for community health workers (CHWs) |
title_fullStr | A mixed methods evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a pilot project ECHO for community health workers (CHWs) |
title_full_unstemmed | A mixed methods evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a pilot project ECHO for community health workers (CHWs) |
title_short | A mixed methods evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a pilot project ECHO for community health workers (CHWs) |
title_sort | mixed methods evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a pilot project echo for community health workers (chws) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7499981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32963804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00678-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT damianapriljoy amixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws AT robinsonsarafina amixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws AT manzoorfaaiza amixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws AT lambmandy amixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws AT rojasadriana amixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws AT portoariel amixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws AT andersondaren amixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws AT damianapriljoy mixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws AT robinsonsarafina mixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws AT manzoorfaaiza mixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws AT lambmandy mixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws AT rojasadriana mixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws AT portoariel mixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws AT andersondaren mixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws |