Cargando…

A mixed methods evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a pilot project ECHO for community health workers (CHWs)

BACKGROUND: Despite the positive effects of community health workers (CHWs) on addressing social determinants of health, improving patient health outcomes, and decreasing overall healthcare costs, there is a lack of standardization in training and certifying this workforce, resulting in different ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Damian, April Joy, Robinson, Sarafina, Manzoor, Faaiza, Lamb, Mandy, Rojas, Adriana, Porto, Ariel, Anderson, Daren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7499981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32963804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00678-y
_version_ 1783583774968119296
author Damian, April Joy
Robinson, Sarafina
Manzoor, Faaiza
Lamb, Mandy
Rojas, Adriana
Porto, Ariel
Anderson, Daren
author_facet Damian, April Joy
Robinson, Sarafina
Manzoor, Faaiza
Lamb, Mandy
Rojas, Adriana
Porto, Ariel
Anderson, Daren
author_sort Damian, April Joy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the positive effects of community health workers (CHWs) on addressing social determinants of health, improving patient health outcomes, and decreasing overall healthcare costs, there is a lack of standardization in training and certifying this workforce, resulting in different approaches to integrating this role into medical home models. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the application of Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes) in enhancing CHWs’ capacity to address health and social issues of vulnerable populations. METHODS: An explanatory sequential mixed methods design was applied in which all participants (N = 49) completed pre (January 2019) and post (July 2019) quantitative online surveys measuring changes in self-efficacy, behavior change intent, and knowledge. Virtual focus groups were conducted with a subset of participants (n = 20) in July 2019 to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of Project ECHO. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference of + 0.453 in the composite self-efficacy mean score pre- to post-series. For every 1 additional Project ECHO CHW session attended, there was a .05 improvement in participants’ self-efficacy to perform CHW-related job duties and address social determinants of health (SDOH). Four major themes emerged from the qualitative focus group data: value in learning from other participants’ caseloads, CHW-care team integration, availability of training and resources, and shared decision-making with patients. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation suggests that ECHO is a viable means of increasing access to training resources for CHWs. Future studies on the ECHO model as a means of educating and broadening implementation of CHWs are warranted. Programs such as Project ECHO can support CHWs by providing continuing education opportunities, as well as standardizing training content across large geographic areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7499981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74999812020-09-21 A mixed methods evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a pilot project ECHO for community health workers (CHWs) Damian, April Joy Robinson, Sarafina Manzoor, Faaiza Lamb, Mandy Rojas, Adriana Porto, Ariel Anderson, Daren Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: Despite the positive effects of community health workers (CHWs) on addressing social determinants of health, improving patient health outcomes, and decreasing overall healthcare costs, there is a lack of standardization in training and certifying this workforce, resulting in different approaches to integrating this role into medical home models. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the application of Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes) in enhancing CHWs’ capacity to address health and social issues of vulnerable populations. METHODS: An explanatory sequential mixed methods design was applied in which all participants (N = 49) completed pre (January 2019) and post (July 2019) quantitative online surveys measuring changes in self-efficacy, behavior change intent, and knowledge. Virtual focus groups were conducted with a subset of participants (n = 20) in July 2019 to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of Project ECHO. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference of + 0.453 in the composite self-efficacy mean score pre- to post-series. For every 1 additional Project ECHO CHW session attended, there was a .05 improvement in participants’ self-efficacy to perform CHW-related job duties and address social determinants of health (SDOH). Four major themes emerged from the qualitative focus group data: value in learning from other participants’ caseloads, CHW-care team integration, availability of training and resources, and shared decision-making with patients. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation suggests that ECHO is a viable means of increasing access to training resources for CHWs. Future studies on the ECHO model as a means of educating and broadening implementation of CHWs are warranted. Programs such as Project ECHO can support CHWs by providing continuing education opportunities, as well as standardizing training content across large geographic areas. BioMed Central 2020-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7499981/ /pubmed/32963804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00678-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Damian, April Joy
Robinson, Sarafina
Manzoor, Faaiza
Lamb, Mandy
Rojas, Adriana
Porto, Ariel
Anderson, Daren
A mixed methods evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a pilot project ECHO for community health workers (CHWs)
title A mixed methods evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a pilot project ECHO for community health workers (CHWs)
title_full A mixed methods evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a pilot project ECHO for community health workers (CHWs)
title_fullStr A mixed methods evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a pilot project ECHO for community health workers (CHWs)
title_full_unstemmed A mixed methods evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a pilot project ECHO for community health workers (CHWs)
title_short A mixed methods evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a pilot project ECHO for community health workers (CHWs)
title_sort mixed methods evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a pilot project echo for community health workers (chws)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7499981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32963804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00678-y
work_keys_str_mv AT damianapriljoy amixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws
AT robinsonsarafina amixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws
AT manzoorfaaiza amixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws
AT lambmandy amixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws
AT rojasadriana amixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws
AT portoariel amixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws
AT andersondaren amixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws
AT damianapriljoy mixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws
AT robinsonsarafina mixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws
AT manzoorfaaiza mixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws
AT lambmandy mixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws
AT rojasadriana mixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws
AT portoariel mixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws
AT andersondaren mixedmethodsevaluationofthefeasibilityacceptabilityandimpactofapilotprojectechoforcommunityhealthworkerschws