Cargando…
Metacognitive beliefs and their relationship with anxiety and depression in physical illnesses: A systematic review
Anxiety and depression are common among patients with chronic physical illnesses and have a significant impact on morbidity, quality of life, and health service utilisation. Psychological treatment of anxiety and depression has small to moderate efficacy in this group and is not commonly based on a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32911486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238457 |
_version_ | 1783583786802348032 |
---|---|
author | Capobianco, Lora Faija, Cintia Husain, Zara Wells, Adrian |
author_facet | Capobianco, Lora Faija, Cintia Husain, Zara Wells, Adrian |
author_sort | Capobianco, Lora |
collection | PubMed |
description | Anxiety and depression are common among patients with chronic physical illnesses and have a significant impact on morbidity, quality of life, and health service utilisation. Psychological treatment of anxiety and depression has small to moderate efficacy in this group and is not commonly based on a model of causal mechanisms. A novel approach to understanding and improving mental health outcomes in physical illnesses is needed. One approach may be to explore the role of metacognitive beliefs which are reliably associated with anxiety and depression in individuals with mental health difficulties. The current systematic review aimed to evaluate the contribution of metacognitive beliefs to anxiety and depression across physical illnesses. Systematic searches were conducted on Web of Science, PsychINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL of studies published between 1997 and January 2019. 13 eligible studies were identified that in sum comprised 2851 participants. Metacognitive beliefs were found to have reliable, moderate, positive and significant associations with anxiety and depression symptoms across a range of physical illnesses. There appeared to be commonality and some specificity in the relationships. Negative metacognitive beliefs concerned with uncontrollability and danger of worry were associated with both anxiety and depression across all physical illnesses assessed, whilst more specific associations emerged for individual medical conditions where positive beliefs about worry, cognitive confidence and cognitive self-consciousness were unique correlates. Negative metacognitive beliefs of uncontrollability and danger significantly and positively predicted symptoms of anxiety and depression after controlling for factors including age, gender, disease factors and cognition (illness perceptions and intolerance of uncertainty). The results suggest that the metacognitive model of psychological disorder is applicable to psychological symptoms of anxiety and depression across a range of chronic medical conditions, implying that metacognitive therapy might be helpful in improving outcomes in multiple morbidities that involve poor mental and medical health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7500039 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75000392020-09-24 Metacognitive beliefs and their relationship with anxiety and depression in physical illnesses: A systematic review Capobianco, Lora Faija, Cintia Husain, Zara Wells, Adrian PLoS One Research Article Anxiety and depression are common among patients with chronic physical illnesses and have a significant impact on morbidity, quality of life, and health service utilisation. Psychological treatment of anxiety and depression has small to moderate efficacy in this group and is not commonly based on a model of causal mechanisms. A novel approach to understanding and improving mental health outcomes in physical illnesses is needed. One approach may be to explore the role of metacognitive beliefs which are reliably associated with anxiety and depression in individuals with mental health difficulties. The current systematic review aimed to evaluate the contribution of metacognitive beliefs to anxiety and depression across physical illnesses. Systematic searches were conducted on Web of Science, PsychINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL of studies published between 1997 and January 2019. 13 eligible studies were identified that in sum comprised 2851 participants. Metacognitive beliefs were found to have reliable, moderate, positive and significant associations with anxiety and depression symptoms across a range of physical illnesses. There appeared to be commonality and some specificity in the relationships. Negative metacognitive beliefs concerned with uncontrollability and danger of worry were associated with both anxiety and depression across all physical illnesses assessed, whilst more specific associations emerged for individual medical conditions where positive beliefs about worry, cognitive confidence and cognitive self-consciousness were unique correlates. Negative metacognitive beliefs of uncontrollability and danger significantly and positively predicted symptoms of anxiety and depression after controlling for factors including age, gender, disease factors and cognition (illness perceptions and intolerance of uncertainty). The results suggest that the metacognitive model of psychological disorder is applicable to psychological symptoms of anxiety and depression across a range of chronic medical conditions, implying that metacognitive therapy might be helpful in improving outcomes in multiple morbidities that involve poor mental and medical health. Public Library of Science 2020-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7500039/ /pubmed/32911486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238457 Text en © 2020 Capobianco et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Capobianco, Lora Faija, Cintia Husain, Zara Wells, Adrian Metacognitive beliefs and their relationship with anxiety and depression in physical illnesses: A systematic review |
title | Metacognitive beliefs and their relationship with anxiety and
depression in physical illnesses: A systematic review |
title_full | Metacognitive beliefs and their relationship with anxiety and
depression in physical illnesses: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Metacognitive beliefs and their relationship with anxiety and
depression in physical illnesses: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Metacognitive beliefs and their relationship with anxiety and
depression in physical illnesses: A systematic review |
title_short | Metacognitive beliefs and their relationship with anxiety and
depression in physical illnesses: A systematic review |
title_sort | metacognitive beliefs and their relationship with anxiety and
depression in physical illnesses: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32911486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238457 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT capobiancolora metacognitivebeliefsandtheirrelationshipwithanxietyanddepressioninphysicalillnessesasystematicreview AT faijacintia metacognitivebeliefsandtheirrelationshipwithanxietyanddepressioninphysicalillnessesasystematicreview AT husainzara metacognitivebeliefsandtheirrelationshipwithanxietyanddepressioninphysicalillnessesasystematicreview AT wellsadrian metacognitivebeliefsandtheirrelationshipwithanxietyanddepressioninphysicalillnessesasystematicreview |