Cargando…

Metacognitive beliefs and their relationship with anxiety and depression in physical illnesses: A systematic review

Anxiety and depression are common among patients with chronic physical illnesses and have a significant impact on morbidity, quality of life, and health service utilisation. Psychological treatment of anxiety and depression has small to moderate efficacy in this group and is not commonly based on a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Capobianco, Lora, Faija, Cintia, Husain, Zara, Wells, Adrian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32911486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238457
_version_ 1783583786802348032
author Capobianco, Lora
Faija, Cintia
Husain, Zara
Wells, Adrian
author_facet Capobianco, Lora
Faija, Cintia
Husain, Zara
Wells, Adrian
author_sort Capobianco, Lora
collection PubMed
description Anxiety and depression are common among patients with chronic physical illnesses and have a significant impact on morbidity, quality of life, and health service utilisation. Psychological treatment of anxiety and depression has small to moderate efficacy in this group and is not commonly based on a model of causal mechanisms. A novel approach to understanding and improving mental health outcomes in physical illnesses is needed. One approach may be to explore the role of metacognitive beliefs which are reliably associated with anxiety and depression in individuals with mental health difficulties. The current systematic review aimed to evaluate the contribution of metacognitive beliefs to anxiety and depression across physical illnesses. Systematic searches were conducted on Web of Science, PsychINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL of studies published between 1997 and January 2019. 13 eligible studies were identified that in sum comprised 2851 participants. Metacognitive beliefs were found to have reliable, moderate, positive and significant associations with anxiety and depression symptoms across a range of physical illnesses. There appeared to be commonality and some specificity in the relationships. Negative metacognitive beliefs concerned with uncontrollability and danger of worry were associated with both anxiety and depression across all physical illnesses assessed, whilst more specific associations emerged for individual medical conditions where positive beliefs about worry, cognitive confidence and cognitive self-consciousness were unique correlates. Negative metacognitive beliefs of uncontrollability and danger significantly and positively predicted symptoms of anxiety and depression after controlling for factors including age, gender, disease factors and cognition (illness perceptions and intolerance of uncertainty). The results suggest that the metacognitive model of psychological disorder is applicable to psychological symptoms of anxiety and depression across a range of chronic medical conditions, implying that metacognitive therapy might be helpful in improving outcomes in multiple morbidities that involve poor mental and medical health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7500039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75000392020-09-24 Metacognitive beliefs and their relationship with anxiety and depression in physical illnesses: A systematic review Capobianco, Lora Faija, Cintia Husain, Zara Wells, Adrian PLoS One Research Article Anxiety and depression are common among patients with chronic physical illnesses and have a significant impact on morbidity, quality of life, and health service utilisation. Psychological treatment of anxiety and depression has small to moderate efficacy in this group and is not commonly based on a model of causal mechanisms. A novel approach to understanding and improving mental health outcomes in physical illnesses is needed. One approach may be to explore the role of metacognitive beliefs which are reliably associated with anxiety and depression in individuals with mental health difficulties. The current systematic review aimed to evaluate the contribution of metacognitive beliefs to anxiety and depression across physical illnesses. Systematic searches were conducted on Web of Science, PsychINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL of studies published between 1997 and January 2019. 13 eligible studies were identified that in sum comprised 2851 participants. Metacognitive beliefs were found to have reliable, moderate, positive and significant associations with anxiety and depression symptoms across a range of physical illnesses. There appeared to be commonality and some specificity in the relationships. Negative metacognitive beliefs concerned with uncontrollability and danger of worry were associated with both anxiety and depression across all physical illnesses assessed, whilst more specific associations emerged for individual medical conditions where positive beliefs about worry, cognitive confidence and cognitive self-consciousness were unique correlates. Negative metacognitive beliefs of uncontrollability and danger significantly and positively predicted symptoms of anxiety and depression after controlling for factors including age, gender, disease factors and cognition (illness perceptions and intolerance of uncertainty). The results suggest that the metacognitive model of psychological disorder is applicable to psychological symptoms of anxiety and depression across a range of chronic medical conditions, implying that metacognitive therapy might be helpful in improving outcomes in multiple morbidities that involve poor mental and medical health. Public Library of Science 2020-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7500039/ /pubmed/32911486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238457 Text en © 2020 Capobianco et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Capobianco, Lora
Faija, Cintia
Husain, Zara
Wells, Adrian
Metacognitive beliefs and their relationship with anxiety and depression in physical illnesses: A systematic review
title Metacognitive beliefs and their relationship with anxiety and depression in physical illnesses: A systematic review
title_full Metacognitive beliefs and their relationship with anxiety and depression in physical illnesses: A systematic review
title_fullStr Metacognitive beliefs and their relationship with anxiety and depression in physical illnesses: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Metacognitive beliefs and their relationship with anxiety and depression in physical illnesses: A systematic review
title_short Metacognitive beliefs and their relationship with anxiety and depression in physical illnesses: A systematic review
title_sort metacognitive beliefs and their relationship with anxiety and depression in physical illnesses: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32911486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238457
work_keys_str_mv AT capobiancolora metacognitivebeliefsandtheirrelationshipwithanxietyanddepressioninphysicalillnessesasystematicreview
AT faijacintia metacognitivebeliefsandtheirrelationshipwithanxietyanddepressioninphysicalillnessesasystematicreview
AT husainzara metacognitivebeliefsandtheirrelationshipwithanxietyanddepressioninphysicalillnessesasystematicreview
AT wellsadrian metacognitivebeliefsandtheirrelationshipwithanxietyanddepressioninphysicalillnessesasystematicreview