Cargando…

Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Validity of Brief Cognitive Screenings for Early Dementia Detection in Spanish-Speaking Adults in Latin America

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of brief cognitive screening (BCS) tools designed to diagnose mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia in Spanish-speaking individuals over the age of 50 years from Latin America (LA). Methods: A systematic search of titles and abstra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Custodio, Nilton, Duque, Lissette, Montesinos, Rosa, Alva-Diaz, Carlos, Mellado, Martin, Slachevsky, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33101004
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.00270
_version_ 1783583791711780864
author Custodio, Nilton
Duque, Lissette
Montesinos, Rosa
Alva-Diaz, Carlos
Mellado, Martin
Slachevsky, Andrea
author_facet Custodio, Nilton
Duque, Lissette
Montesinos, Rosa
Alva-Diaz, Carlos
Mellado, Martin
Slachevsky, Andrea
author_sort Custodio, Nilton
collection PubMed
description Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of brief cognitive screening (BCS) tools designed to diagnose mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia in Spanish-speaking individuals over the age of 50 years from Latin America (LA). Methods: A systematic search of titles and abstracts in Medline, Biomed Central, Embase, Scopus, Scirus, PsycINFO, LILACS, and SciELO was conducted. Inclusion criteria were papers written in English or Spanish involving samples from Spanish-speaking Latin American individuals published until 2018. Standard procedures were applied for reviewing the literature. The data related to the study sample, methodology, and procedures applied, as well as the performance obtained with the corresponding BCS, were collected and systematized. Results: Thirteen of 211 articles met the inclusion criteria. The studies primarily involved memory clinic-based samples, with the exception of two studies from an adult day-care center, one from a primary care clinic, and one from a community-based sample. All the studies originated from five of the 20 countries of LA and all used standardized diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of dementia and MCI; however, the diagnostic protocols applied differed. Most studies reported samples with an average of 10 years of education and only one reported a sample with an average of <5 years of education. No publication to date has included an illiterate population. Although the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) is the most widely-used BCS tool in LA, it is significantly influenced by education level. Conclusions: Although evidence is still limited, the findings from studies on LA populations suggest that MoCA requires cultural adaptations and different cutoff points according to education level. Moreover, the diagnostic validity of the INECO frontal screening (IFS) test should be evaluated in populations with a low level of education. Given the heterogeneity that exists in the levels of education in LA, more studies involving illiterate and indigenous populations are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7500065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75000652020-10-22 Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Validity of Brief Cognitive Screenings for Early Dementia Detection in Spanish-Speaking Adults in Latin America Custodio, Nilton Duque, Lissette Montesinos, Rosa Alva-Diaz, Carlos Mellado, Martin Slachevsky, Andrea Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of brief cognitive screening (BCS) tools designed to diagnose mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia in Spanish-speaking individuals over the age of 50 years from Latin America (LA). Methods: A systematic search of titles and abstracts in Medline, Biomed Central, Embase, Scopus, Scirus, PsycINFO, LILACS, and SciELO was conducted. Inclusion criteria were papers written in English or Spanish involving samples from Spanish-speaking Latin American individuals published until 2018. Standard procedures were applied for reviewing the literature. The data related to the study sample, methodology, and procedures applied, as well as the performance obtained with the corresponding BCS, were collected and systematized. Results: Thirteen of 211 articles met the inclusion criteria. The studies primarily involved memory clinic-based samples, with the exception of two studies from an adult day-care center, one from a primary care clinic, and one from a community-based sample. All the studies originated from five of the 20 countries of LA and all used standardized diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of dementia and MCI; however, the diagnostic protocols applied differed. Most studies reported samples with an average of 10 years of education and only one reported a sample with an average of <5 years of education. No publication to date has included an illiterate population. Although the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) is the most widely-used BCS tool in LA, it is significantly influenced by education level. Conclusions: Although evidence is still limited, the findings from studies on LA populations suggest that MoCA requires cultural adaptations and different cutoff points according to education level. Moreover, the diagnostic validity of the INECO frontal screening (IFS) test should be evaluated in populations with a low level of education. Given the heterogeneity that exists in the levels of education in LA, more studies involving illiterate and indigenous populations are required. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7500065/ /pubmed/33101004 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.00270 Text en Copyright © 2020 Custodio, Duque, Montesinos, Alva-Diaz, Mellado and Slachevsky. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Custodio, Nilton
Duque, Lissette
Montesinos, Rosa
Alva-Diaz, Carlos
Mellado, Martin
Slachevsky, Andrea
Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Validity of Brief Cognitive Screenings for Early Dementia Detection in Spanish-Speaking Adults in Latin America
title Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Validity of Brief Cognitive Screenings for Early Dementia Detection in Spanish-Speaking Adults in Latin America
title_full Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Validity of Brief Cognitive Screenings for Early Dementia Detection in Spanish-Speaking Adults in Latin America
title_fullStr Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Validity of Brief Cognitive Screenings for Early Dementia Detection in Spanish-Speaking Adults in Latin America
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Validity of Brief Cognitive Screenings for Early Dementia Detection in Spanish-Speaking Adults in Latin America
title_short Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Validity of Brief Cognitive Screenings for Early Dementia Detection in Spanish-Speaking Adults in Latin America
title_sort systematic review of the diagnostic validity of brief cognitive screenings for early dementia detection in spanish-speaking adults in latin america
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33101004
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.00270
work_keys_str_mv AT custodionilton systematicreviewofthediagnosticvalidityofbriefcognitivescreeningsforearlydementiadetectioninspanishspeakingadultsinlatinamerica
AT duquelissette systematicreviewofthediagnosticvalidityofbriefcognitivescreeningsforearlydementiadetectioninspanishspeakingadultsinlatinamerica
AT montesinosrosa systematicreviewofthediagnosticvalidityofbriefcognitivescreeningsforearlydementiadetectioninspanishspeakingadultsinlatinamerica
AT alvadiazcarlos systematicreviewofthediagnosticvalidityofbriefcognitivescreeningsforearlydementiadetectioninspanishspeakingadultsinlatinamerica
AT melladomartin systematicreviewofthediagnosticvalidityofbriefcognitivescreeningsforearlydementiadetectioninspanishspeakingadultsinlatinamerica
AT slachevskyandrea systematicreviewofthediagnosticvalidityofbriefcognitivescreeningsforearlydementiadetectioninspanishspeakingadultsinlatinamerica