Cargando…

Throwing darts in ICU: how close are we in estimating energy requirements?

BACKGROUND: Indirect calorimetry (IC) is the gold standard for determining energy requirement. Due to lack of availability in many institutions, predictive equations are used to estimate energy requirements. The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of predictive equations (ie, Harris-B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grguric, Laryssa, Musillo, Lisa, DiGiacomo, Jody C, Munnangi, Swapna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33024828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2020-000493
_version_ 1783583818044669952
author Grguric, Laryssa
Musillo, Lisa
DiGiacomo, Jody C
Munnangi, Swapna
author_facet Grguric, Laryssa
Musillo, Lisa
DiGiacomo, Jody C
Munnangi, Swapna
author_sort Grguric, Laryssa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Indirect calorimetry (IC) is the gold standard for determining energy requirement. Due to lack of availability in many institutions, predictive equations are used to estimate energy requirements. The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of predictive equations (ie, Harris-Benedict equation (HBE), Mifflin-St Jeor equation (MSJ), and Penn State University equation (PSU)) used to determine energy needs for critically ill, ventilated patients compared with measured resting energy expenditure (mREE). METHODS: The researchers examined data routinely collected as part of clinical care for patients within intensive care units (ICUs). The final sample consisted of 68 patients. All studies were recorded during a single inpatient stay within an ICU. RESULTS: Patients, on average, had an mREE of 33.9 kcal/kg using IC. The estimated energy requirement when using predictive equations was 24.8 kcal/kg (HBE×1.25), 24.0 kcal/kg (MSJ×1.25), and 26.8 kcal/kg (PSU). DISCUSSION: This study identified significant differences between mREE and commonly used predictive equations in the ICU. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7500195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75001952020-10-05 Throwing darts in ICU: how close are we in estimating energy requirements? Grguric, Laryssa Musillo, Lisa DiGiacomo, Jody C Munnangi, Swapna Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Original Research BACKGROUND: Indirect calorimetry (IC) is the gold standard for determining energy requirement. Due to lack of availability in many institutions, predictive equations are used to estimate energy requirements. The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of predictive equations (ie, Harris-Benedict equation (HBE), Mifflin-St Jeor equation (MSJ), and Penn State University equation (PSU)) used to determine energy needs for critically ill, ventilated patients compared with measured resting energy expenditure (mREE). METHODS: The researchers examined data routinely collected as part of clinical care for patients within intensive care units (ICUs). The final sample consisted of 68 patients. All studies were recorded during a single inpatient stay within an ICU. RESULTS: Patients, on average, had an mREE of 33.9 kcal/kg using IC. The estimated energy requirement when using predictive equations was 24.8 kcal/kg (HBE×1.25), 24.0 kcal/kg (MSJ×1.25), and 26.8 kcal/kg (PSU). DISCUSSION: This study identified significant differences between mREE and commonly used predictive equations in the ICU. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7500195/ /pubmed/33024828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2020-000493 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Grguric, Laryssa
Musillo, Lisa
DiGiacomo, Jody C
Munnangi, Swapna
Throwing darts in ICU: how close are we in estimating energy requirements?
title Throwing darts in ICU: how close are we in estimating energy requirements?
title_full Throwing darts in ICU: how close are we in estimating energy requirements?
title_fullStr Throwing darts in ICU: how close are we in estimating energy requirements?
title_full_unstemmed Throwing darts in ICU: how close are we in estimating energy requirements?
title_short Throwing darts in ICU: how close are we in estimating energy requirements?
title_sort throwing darts in icu: how close are we in estimating energy requirements?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33024828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2020-000493
work_keys_str_mv AT grguriclaryssa throwingdartsinicuhowcloseareweinestimatingenergyrequirements
AT musillolisa throwingdartsinicuhowcloseareweinestimatingenergyrequirements
AT digiacomojodyc throwingdartsinicuhowcloseareweinestimatingenergyrequirements
AT munnangiswapna throwingdartsinicuhowcloseareweinestimatingenergyrequirements