Cargando…
Throwing darts in ICU: how close are we in estimating energy requirements?
BACKGROUND: Indirect calorimetry (IC) is the gold standard for determining energy requirement. Due to lack of availability in many institutions, predictive equations are used to estimate energy requirements. The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of predictive equations (ie, Harris-B...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33024828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2020-000493 |
_version_ | 1783583818044669952 |
---|---|
author | Grguric, Laryssa Musillo, Lisa DiGiacomo, Jody C Munnangi, Swapna |
author_facet | Grguric, Laryssa Musillo, Lisa DiGiacomo, Jody C Munnangi, Swapna |
author_sort | Grguric, Laryssa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Indirect calorimetry (IC) is the gold standard for determining energy requirement. Due to lack of availability in many institutions, predictive equations are used to estimate energy requirements. The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of predictive equations (ie, Harris-Benedict equation (HBE), Mifflin-St Jeor equation (MSJ), and Penn State University equation (PSU)) used to determine energy needs for critically ill, ventilated patients compared with measured resting energy expenditure (mREE). METHODS: The researchers examined data routinely collected as part of clinical care for patients within intensive care units (ICUs). The final sample consisted of 68 patients. All studies were recorded during a single inpatient stay within an ICU. RESULTS: Patients, on average, had an mREE of 33.9 kcal/kg using IC. The estimated energy requirement when using predictive equations was 24.8 kcal/kg (HBE×1.25), 24.0 kcal/kg (MSJ×1.25), and 26.8 kcal/kg (PSU). DISCUSSION: This study identified significant differences between mREE and commonly used predictive equations in the ICU. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7500195 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75001952020-10-05 Throwing darts in ICU: how close are we in estimating energy requirements? Grguric, Laryssa Musillo, Lisa DiGiacomo, Jody C Munnangi, Swapna Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Original Research BACKGROUND: Indirect calorimetry (IC) is the gold standard for determining energy requirement. Due to lack of availability in many institutions, predictive equations are used to estimate energy requirements. The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of predictive equations (ie, Harris-Benedict equation (HBE), Mifflin-St Jeor equation (MSJ), and Penn State University equation (PSU)) used to determine energy needs for critically ill, ventilated patients compared with measured resting energy expenditure (mREE). METHODS: The researchers examined data routinely collected as part of clinical care for patients within intensive care units (ICUs). The final sample consisted of 68 patients. All studies were recorded during a single inpatient stay within an ICU. RESULTS: Patients, on average, had an mREE of 33.9 kcal/kg using IC. The estimated energy requirement when using predictive equations was 24.8 kcal/kg (HBE×1.25), 24.0 kcal/kg (MSJ×1.25), and 26.8 kcal/kg (PSU). DISCUSSION: This study identified significant differences between mREE and commonly used predictive equations in the ICU. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7500195/ /pubmed/33024828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2020-000493 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Grguric, Laryssa Musillo, Lisa DiGiacomo, Jody C Munnangi, Swapna Throwing darts in ICU: how close are we in estimating energy requirements? |
title | Throwing darts in ICU: how close are we in estimating energy requirements? |
title_full | Throwing darts in ICU: how close are we in estimating energy requirements? |
title_fullStr | Throwing darts in ICU: how close are we in estimating energy requirements? |
title_full_unstemmed | Throwing darts in ICU: how close are we in estimating energy requirements? |
title_short | Throwing darts in ICU: how close are we in estimating energy requirements? |
title_sort | throwing darts in icu: how close are we in estimating energy requirements? |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33024828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2020-000493 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grguriclaryssa throwingdartsinicuhowcloseareweinestimatingenergyrequirements AT musillolisa throwingdartsinicuhowcloseareweinestimatingenergyrequirements AT digiacomojodyc throwingdartsinicuhowcloseareweinestimatingenergyrequirements AT munnangiswapna throwingdartsinicuhowcloseareweinestimatingenergyrequirements |