Cargando…

Cognitive, Affective, and Feedback-Based Flexibility – Disentangling Shared and Different Aspects of Three Facets of Psychological Flexibility

Cognitive flexibility – the ability to adjust one ´s behavior to changing environmental demands – is crucial for controlled behavior. However, the term ‘cognitive flexibility’ is used heterogeneously, and associations between cognitive flexibility and other facets of flexible behavior have only rare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kraft, Dominik, Rademacher, Lena, Eckart, Cindy, Fiebach, Christian J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32984758
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.120
_version_ 1783583822788427776
author Kraft, Dominik
Rademacher, Lena
Eckart, Cindy
Fiebach, Christian J.
author_facet Kraft, Dominik
Rademacher, Lena
Eckart, Cindy
Fiebach, Christian J.
author_sort Kraft, Dominik
collection PubMed
description Cognitive flexibility – the ability to adjust one ´s behavior to changing environmental demands – is crucial for controlled behavior. However, the term ‘cognitive flexibility’ is used heterogeneously, and associations between cognitive flexibility and other facets of flexible behavior have only rarely been studied systematically. To resolve some of these conceptual uncertainties, we directly compared cognitive flexibility (cue-instructed switching between two affectively neutral tasks), affective flexibility (switching between a neutral and an affective task using emotional stimuli), and feedback-based flexibility (non-cued, feedback-dependent switching between two neutral tasks). Three experimental paradigms were established that share as many procedural features (in terms of stimuli and/or task rules) as possible and administered in a pre-registered study plan (N = 100). Correlation analyses revealed significant associations between the efficiency of cognitive and affective task switching (response time switch costs). Feedback-based flexibility (measured as mean number of errors after rule reversals) did not correlate with task switching efficiency in the other paradigms, but selectively with the effectiveness of affective switching (error rate costs when switching from neutral to emotion task). While preregistered confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) provided no clear evidence for a shared factor underlying the efficiency of switching in all three domains of flexibility, an exploratory CFA suggested commonalities regarding switching effectiveness (accuracy-based switch costs). We propose shared mechanisms controlling the efficiency of cue-dependent task switching across domains, while the relationship to feedback-based flexibility may depend on mechanisms controlling switching effectiveness. Our results call for a more stringent conceptual differentiation between different variants of psychological flexibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7500224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75002242020-09-25 Cognitive, Affective, and Feedback-Based Flexibility – Disentangling Shared and Different Aspects of Three Facets of Psychological Flexibility Kraft, Dominik Rademacher, Lena Eckart, Cindy Fiebach, Christian J. J Cogn Research Article Cognitive flexibility – the ability to adjust one ´s behavior to changing environmental demands – is crucial for controlled behavior. However, the term ‘cognitive flexibility’ is used heterogeneously, and associations between cognitive flexibility and other facets of flexible behavior have only rarely been studied systematically. To resolve some of these conceptual uncertainties, we directly compared cognitive flexibility (cue-instructed switching between two affectively neutral tasks), affective flexibility (switching between a neutral and an affective task using emotional stimuli), and feedback-based flexibility (non-cued, feedback-dependent switching between two neutral tasks). Three experimental paradigms were established that share as many procedural features (in terms of stimuli and/or task rules) as possible and administered in a pre-registered study plan (N = 100). Correlation analyses revealed significant associations between the efficiency of cognitive and affective task switching (response time switch costs). Feedback-based flexibility (measured as mean number of errors after rule reversals) did not correlate with task switching efficiency in the other paradigms, but selectively with the effectiveness of affective switching (error rate costs when switching from neutral to emotion task). While preregistered confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) provided no clear evidence for a shared factor underlying the efficiency of switching in all three domains of flexibility, an exploratory CFA suggested commonalities regarding switching effectiveness (accuracy-based switch costs). We propose shared mechanisms controlling the efficiency of cue-dependent task switching across domains, while the relationship to feedback-based flexibility may depend on mechanisms controlling switching effectiveness. Our results call for a more stringent conceptual differentiation between different variants of psychological flexibility. Ubiquity Press 2020-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7500224/ /pubmed/32984758 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.120 Text en Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kraft, Dominik
Rademacher, Lena
Eckart, Cindy
Fiebach, Christian J.
Cognitive, Affective, and Feedback-Based Flexibility – Disentangling Shared and Different Aspects of Three Facets of Psychological Flexibility
title Cognitive, Affective, and Feedback-Based Flexibility – Disentangling Shared and Different Aspects of Three Facets of Psychological Flexibility
title_full Cognitive, Affective, and Feedback-Based Flexibility – Disentangling Shared and Different Aspects of Three Facets of Psychological Flexibility
title_fullStr Cognitive, Affective, and Feedback-Based Flexibility – Disentangling Shared and Different Aspects of Three Facets of Psychological Flexibility
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive, Affective, and Feedback-Based Flexibility – Disentangling Shared and Different Aspects of Three Facets of Psychological Flexibility
title_short Cognitive, Affective, and Feedback-Based Flexibility – Disentangling Shared and Different Aspects of Three Facets of Psychological Flexibility
title_sort cognitive, affective, and feedback-based flexibility – disentangling shared and different aspects of three facets of psychological flexibility
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32984758
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.120
work_keys_str_mv AT kraftdominik cognitiveaffectiveandfeedbackbasedflexibilitydisentanglingsharedanddifferentaspectsofthreefacetsofpsychologicalflexibility
AT rademacherlena cognitiveaffectiveandfeedbackbasedflexibilitydisentanglingsharedanddifferentaspectsofthreefacetsofpsychologicalflexibility
AT eckartcindy cognitiveaffectiveandfeedbackbasedflexibilitydisentanglingsharedanddifferentaspectsofthreefacetsofpsychologicalflexibility
AT fiebachchristianj cognitiveaffectiveandfeedbackbasedflexibilitydisentanglingsharedanddifferentaspectsofthreefacetsofpsychologicalflexibility