Cargando…

Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Psychological factors such as fear avoidance beliefs, depression, anxiety, catastrophic thinking and familial and social stress, have been associated with high disability levels in people with chronic low back pain (LBP). Guidelines endorse the integration of psychological intervention...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ho, Emma, Ferreira, Manuela, Chen, Lingxiao, Simic, Milena, Ashton-James, Claire, Comachio, Josielli, Hayden, Jill, Ferreira, Paulo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32948543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034996
_version_ 1783583837833396224
author Ho, Emma
Ferreira, Manuela
Chen, Lingxiao
Simic, Milena
Ashton-James, Claire
Comachio, Josielli
Hayden, Jill
Ferreira, Paulo
author_facet Ho, Emma
Ferreira, Manuela
Chen, Lingxiao
Simic, Milena
Ashton-James, Claire
Comachio, Josielli
Hayden, Jill
Ferreira, Paulo
author_sort Ho, Emma
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Psychological factors such as fear avoidance beliefs, depression, anxiety, catastrophic thinking and familial and social stress, have been associated with high disability levels in people with chronic low back pain (LBP). Guidelines endorse the integration of psychological interventions in the management of chronic LBP. However, uncertainty surrounds the comparative effectiveness of different psychological approaches. Network meta-analysis (NMA) allows comparison and ranking of numerous competing interventions for a given outcome of interest. Therefore, we will perform a systematic review with a NMA to determine which type of psychological intervention is most effective for adults with chronic non-specific LBP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, SCOPUS and CINAHL) from inception until 22 August 2019 for randomised controlled trials comparing psychological interventions to any comparison interventions in adults with chronic non-specific LBP. There will be no restriction on language. The primary outcomes will include physical function and pain intensity, and secondary outcomes will include health-related quality of life, fear avoidance, intervention compliance and safety. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2) tool and confidence in the evidence will be assessed using the Confidence in NMA (CINeMA) framework. We will conduct a random-effects NMA using a frequentist approach to estimate relative effects for all comparisons between treatments and rank treatments according to the mean rank and surface under the cumulative ranking curve values. All analyses will be performed in Stata. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required. The research will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019138074.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7500308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75003082020-10-05 Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis Ho, Emma Ferreira, Manuela Chen, Lingxiao Simic, Milena Ashton-James, Claire Comachio, Josielli Hayden, Jill Ferreira, Paulo BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: Psychological factors such as fear avoidance beliefs, depression, anxiety, catastrophic thinking and familial and social stress, have been associated with high disability levels in people with chronic low back pain (LBP). Guidelines endorse the integration of psychological interventions in the management of chronic LBP. However, uncertainty surrounds the comparative effectiveness of different psychological approaches. Network meta-analysis (NMA) allows comparison and ranking of numerous competing interventions for a given outcome of interest. Therefore, we will perform a systematic review with a NMA to determine which type of psychological intervention is most effective for adults with chronic non-specific LBP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, SCOPUS and CINAHL) from inception until 22 August 2019 for randomised controlled trials comparing psychological interventions to any comparison interventions in adults with chronic non-specific LBP. There will be no restriction on language. The primary outcomes will include physical function and pain intensity, and secondary outcomes will include health-related quality of life, fear avoidance, intervention compliance and safety. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2) tool and confidence in the evidence will be assessed using the Confidence in NMA (CINeMA) framework. We will conduct a random-effects NMA using a frequentist approach to estimate relative effects for all comparisons between treatments and rank treatments according to the mean rank and surface under the cumulative ranking curve values. All analyses will be performed in Stata. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required. The research will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019138074. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7500308/ /pubmed/32948543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034996 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Ho, Emma
Ferreira, Manuela
Chen, Lingxiao
Simic, Milena
Ashton-James, Claire
Comachio, Josielli
Hayden, Jill
Ferreira, Paulo
Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis
title Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis
title_full Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis
title_short Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis
title_sort psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32948543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034996
work_keys_str_mv AT hoemma psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT ferreiramanuela psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT chenlingxiao psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT simicmilena psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT ashtonjamesclaire psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT comachiojosielli psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT haydenjill psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT ferreirapaulo psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis