Cargando…
Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Psychological factors such as fear avoidance beliefs, depression, anxiety, catastrophic thinking and familial and social stress, have been associated with high disability levels in people with chronic low back pain (LBP). Guidelines endorse the integration of psychological intervention...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32948543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034996 |
_version_ | 1783583837833396224 |
---|---|
author | Ho, Emma Ferreira, Manuela Chen, Lingxiao Simic, Milena Ashton-James, Claire Comachio, Josielli Hayden, Jill Ferreira, Paulo |
author_facet | Ho, Emma Ferreira, Manuela Chen, Lingxiao Simic, Milena Ashton-James, Claire Comachio, Josielli Hayden, Jill Ferreira, Paulo |
author_sort | Ho, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Psychological factors such as fear avoidance beliefs, depression, anxiety, catastrophic thinking and familial and social stress, have been associated with high disability levels in people with chronic low back pain (LBP). Guidelines endorse the integration of psychological interventions in the management of chronic LBP. However, uncertainty surrounds the comparative effectiveness of different psychological approaches. Network meta-analysis (NMA) allows comparison and ranking of numerous competing interventions for a given outcome of interest. Therefore, we will perform a systematic review with a NMA to determine which type of psychological intervention is most effective for adults with chronic non-specific LBP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, SCOPUS and CINAHL) from inception until 22 August 2019 for randomised controlled trials comparing psychological interventions to any comparison interventions in adults with chronic non-specific LBP. There will be no restriction on language. The primary outcomes will include physical function and pain intensity, and secondary outcomes will include health-related quality of life, fear avoidance, intervention compliance and safety. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2) tool and confidence in the evidence will be assessed using the Confidence in NMA (CINeMA) framework. We will conduct a random-effects NMA using a frequentist approach to estimate relative effects for all comparisons between treatments and rank treatments according to the mean rank and surface under the cumulative ranking curve values. All analyses will be performed in Stata. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required. The research will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019138074. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7500308 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75003082020-10-05 Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis Ho, Emma Ferreira, Manuela Chen, Lingxiao Simic, Milena Ashton-James, Claire Comachio, Josielli Hayden, Jill Ferreira, Paulo BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: Psychological factors such as fear avoidance beliefs, depression, anxiety, catastrophic thinking and familial and social stress, have been associated with high disability levels in people with chronic low back pain (LBP). Guidelines endorse the integration of psychological interventions in the management of chronic LBP. However, uncertainty surrounds the comparative effectiveness of different psychological approaches. Network meta-analysis (NMA) allows comparison and ranking of numerous competing interventions for a given outcome of interest. Therefore, we will perform a systematic review with a NMA to determine which type of psychological intervention is most effective for adults with chronic non-specific LBP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, SCOPUS and CINAHL) from inception until 22 August 2019 for randomised controlled trials comparing psychological interventions to any comparison interventions in adults with chronic non-specific LBP. There will be no restriction on language. The primary outcomes will include physical function and pain intensity, and secondary outcomes will include health-related quality of life, fear avoidance, intervention compliance and safety. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2) tool and confidence in the evidence will be assessed using the Confidence in NMA (CINeMA) framework. We will conduct a random-effects NMA using a frequentist approach to estimate relative effects for all comparisons between treatments and rank treatments according to the mean rank and surface under the cumulative ranking curve values. All analyses will be performed in Stata. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required. The research will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019138074. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7500308/ /pubmed/32948543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034996 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Ho, Emma Ferreira, Manuela Chen, Lingxiao Simic, Milena Ashton-James, Claire Comachio, Josielli Hayden, Jill Ferreira, Paulo Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis |
title | Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis |
title_full | Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis |
title_short | Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis |
title_sort | psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32948543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034996 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoemma psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis AT ferreiramanuela psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis AT chenlingxiao psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis AT simicmilena psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis AT ashtonjamesclaire psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis AT comachiojosielli psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis AT haydenjill psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis AT ferreirapaulo psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis |