Cargando…

Neurophysiological parameters of sensory perception and cognition among different modalities of learners

INTRODUCTION: Different types of learners based on sensory modalities are observed. Cognition or physiological alterations in the sensory pathways might play its role in different modalities of visual, auditory, read and write, and kinesthetic learners which are based on different sensory modalities...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parashar, Rachna, Shukla, Mukesh, Ganguly, Abhimanyu, Hulke, Sandip M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33015200
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_654_19
_version_ 1783583853446692864
author Parashar, Rachna
Shukla, Mukesh
Ganguly, Abhimanyu
Hulke, Sandip M.
author_facet Parashar, Rachna
Shukla, Mukesh
Ganguly, Abhimanyu
Hulke, Sandip M.
author_sort Parashar, Rachna
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Different types of learners based on sensory modalities are observed. Cognition or physiological alterations in the sensory pathways might play its role in different modalities of visual, auditory, read and write, and kinesthetic learners which are based on different sensory modalities of perception OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to ascertain an objective parameter (neurophysiological parameters) for the classification of learners based on their preferred sensory modality MATERIALS AND METHODS: An experimental cross-sectional study was conducted among 100 medical students. Learners were classified into visual, auditory, read-write, and kinesthetic learners based on the interpretation drawn on the basis of the VARK questionnaire. Sensory-evoked potentials (SEPs), including pattern shift visual (PSVEPs), brain stem auditory (BAEPs), short-latency somatosensory (SSEP), and event-related potentials (P300) were measured. SEPs measured in microvolts were recorded from the scalp with the help of active and reference electrodes. Multiple responses to sensory stimuli (using NIHON KOHDEN Corporation Neuropack X1, Tokyo, Japan) were recored and averaged using the computerized signal averging technique. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed in conduction velocities (in terms of latency and amplitude) of SEP among different type of learners, except latency N145 wave form in VEP (P < 0.05). A characteristic pattern of minimal comparative latency was observed among the majority of visual learners. Similary, P300 has shown a characteristic pattern of decreased comparative latency among majority of read and write learners. CONCLUSION: Study findings suggested that among existing teaching and learning modalities, visual modalities were observed faster but to retain it in memory and for abstract thinking, students should utilize read and writing skills which are lacking in the era of digitalization and overuse of electronic devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7500395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75003952020-10-01 Neurophysiological parameters of sensory perception and cognition among different modalities of learners Parashar, Rachna Shukla, Mukesh Ganguly, Abhimanyu Hulke, Sandip M. J Educ Health Promot Original Article INTRODUCTION: Different types of learners based on sensory modalities are observed. Cognition or physiological alterations in the sensory pathways might play its role in different modalities of visual, auditory, read and write, and kinesthetic learners which are based on different sensory modalities of perception OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to ascertain an objective parameter (neurophysiological parameters) for the classification of learners based on their preferred sensory modality MATERIALS AND METHODS: An experimental cross-sectional study was conducted among 100 medical students. Learners were classified into visual, auditory, read-write, and kinesthetic learners based on the interpretation drawn on the basis of the VARK questionnaire. Sensory-evoked potentials (SEPs), including pattern shift visual (PSVEPs), brain stem auditory (BAEPs), short-latency somatosensory (SSEP), and event-related potentials (P300) were measured. SEPs measured in microvolts were recorded from the scalp with the help of active and reference electrodes. Multiple responses to sensory stimuli (using NIHON KOHDEN Corporation Neuropack X1, Tokyo, Japan) were recored and averaged using the computerized signal averging technique. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed in conduction velocities (in terms of latency and amplitude) of SEP among different type of learners, except latency N145 wave form in VEP (P < 0.05). A characteristic pattern of minimal comparative latency was observed among the majority of visual learners. Similary, P300 has shown a characteristic pattern of decreased comparative latency among majority of read and write learners. CONCLUSION: Study findings suggested that among existing teaching and learning modalities, visual modalities were observed faster but to retain it in memory and for abstract thinking, students should utilize read and writing skills which are lacking in the era of digitalization and overuse of electronic devices. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7500395/ /pubmed/33015200 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_654_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Education and Health Promotion http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Parashar, Rachna
Shukla, Mukesh
Ganguly, Abhimanyu
Hulke, Sandip M.
Neurophysiological parameters of sensory perception and cognition among different modalities of learners
title Neurophysiological parameters of sensory perception and cognition among different modalities of learners
title_full Neurophysiological parameters of sensory perception and cognition among different modalities of learners
title_fullStr Neurophysiological parameters of sensory perception and cognition among different modalities of learners
title_full_unstemmed Neurophysiological parameters of sensory perception and cognition among different modalities of learners
title_short Neurophysiological parameters of sensory perception and cognition among different modalities of learners
title_sort neurophysiological parameters of sensory perception and cognition among different modalities of learners
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33015200
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_654_19
work_keys_str_mv AT parasharrachna neurophysiologicalparametersofsensoryperceptionandcognitionamongdifferentmodalitiesoflearners
AT shuklamukesh neurophysiologicalparametersofsensoryperceptionandcognitionamongdifferentmodalitiesoflearners
AT gangulyabhimanyu neurophysiologicalparametersofsensoryperceptionandcognitionamongdifferentmodalitiesoflearners
AT hulkesandipm neurophysiologicalparametersofsensoryperceptionandcognitionamongdifferentmodalitiesoflearners