Cargando…
Coronavirus: Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications from 1968 to 2020
Background: The World Health Organization declared the outbreak of COVID-19as a public health emergency of international concern on January 30, 2020. Therefore, relevant research metrics would be an added value for understanding the virus for researchers. Methods: Research outputs related to the Cor...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Iran University of Medical Sciences
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32974230 http://dx.doi.org/10.34171/mjiri.34.64 |
_version_ | 1783583860869562368 |
---|---|
author | Joshua, Vasna Sivaprakasam, Satish |
author_facet | Joshua, Vasna Sivaprakasam, Satish |
author_sort | Joshua, Vasna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The World Health Organization declared the outbreak of COVID-19as a public health emergency of international concern on January 30, 2020. Therefore, relevant research metrics would be an added value for understanding the virus for researchers. Methods: Research outputs related to the Coronavirus were retrieved from the Web of Science database from January 1968 to March 2020 and were analyzed using MS-office, Word Cloud generator, VOS viewer, and ArcGIS software. The analysis was based on the number of research publications per year, contributing author’s clustering pattern, most preferred journals, leading publication, document type, broad research areas, commonly used keywords, the geographical distribution of publications, commonly used languages, and productive institutes. Results: The search retrieved 6424 Coronavirus research publications. The number of articles found in the year 1968 was 1, but it was 275 in 2019. A total of 33 clusters of authors contributed to studies on COVID-19 across the globe. The Journal of Virology had the most productivityon Coronavirus publications (n=810). An article published by Ksiazek TG et al in the New England Journal of Medicine had the maximum citation (n=2175); 90% of the research outputs were articles, broadly classified under Infectious diseases (n=5341); and the most commonly used keyword was ‘Coronavirus’. The higher number of publications was from the USA (n=2345) and the commonly used language was English (n=5948), and the most productive institute was the University of Hong Kong (n=506). Conclusion: The results of the study showed that the growth pattern was not uniform, the United States, and the University of Hong Kong have played a major role in the contribution of Coronavirus research. Even though this depicts a higher scientific growth, it is an alarming sign to the community for preparedness. Under the prevailing situation of seeking better prevention, treatment and vaccination for COVID-19, in-depth research in the above portrayed metrics would be an added knowledge for the researchers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7500428 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Iran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75004282020-09-23 Coronavirus: Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications from 1968 to 2020 Joshua, Vasna Sivaprakasam, Satish Med J Islam Repub Iran Original Article Background: The World Health Organization declared the outbreak of COVID-19as a public health emergency of international concern on January 30, 2020. Therefore, relevant research metrics would be an added value for understanding the virus for researchers. Methods: Research outputs related to the Coronavirus were retrieved from the Web of Science database from January 1968 to March 2020 and were analyzed using MS-office, Word Cloud generator, VOS viewer, and ArcGIS software. The analysis was based on the number of research publications per year, contributing author’s clustering pattern, most preferred journals, leading publication, document type, broad research areas, commonly used keywords, the geographical distribution of publications, commonly used languages, and productive institutes. Results: The search retrieved 6424 Coronavirus research publications. The number of articles found in the year 1968 was 1, but it was 275 in 2019. A total of 33 clusters of authors contributed to studies on COVID-19 across the globe. The Journal of Virology had the most productivityon Coronavirus publications (n=810). An article published by Ksiazek TG et al in the New England Journal of Medicine had the maximum citation (n=2175); 90% of the research outputs were articles, broadly classified under Infectious diseases (n=5341); and the most commonly used keyword was ‘Coronavirus’. The higher number of publications was from the USA (n=2345) and the commonly used language was English (n=5948), and the most productive institute was the University of Hong Kong (n=506). Conclusion: The results of the study showed that the growth pattern was not uniform, the United States, and the University of Hong Kong have played a major role in the contribution of Coronavirus research. Even though this depicts a higher scientific growth, it is an alarming sign to the community for preparedness. Under the prevailing situation of seeking better prevention, treatment and vaccination for COVID-19, in-depth research in the above portrayed metrics would be an added knowledge for the researchers. Iran University of Medical Sciences 2020-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7500428/ /pubmed/32974230 http://dx.doi.org/10.34171/mjiri.34.64 Text en © 2020 Iran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-ShareAlike 1.0 License (CC BY-NC-SA 1.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Joshua, Vasna Sivaprakasam, Satish Coronavirus: Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications from 1968 to 2020 |
title | Coronavirus: Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications from 1968 to 2020 |
title_full | Coronavirus: Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications from 1968 to 2020 |
title_fullStr | Coronavirus: Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications from 1968 to 2020 |
title_full_unstemmed | Coronavirus: Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications from 1968 to 2020 |
title_short | Coronavirus: Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications from 1968 to 2020 |
title_sort | coronavirus: bibliometric analysis of scientific publications from 1968 to 2020 |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32974230 http://dx.doi.org/10.34171/mjiri.34.64 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joshuavasna coronavirusbibliometricanalysisofscientificpublicationsfrom1968to2020 AT sivaprakasamsatish coronavirusbibliometricanalysisofscientificpublicationsfrom1968to2020 |