Cargando…

Colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography in FIT-positive colorectal cancer screening subjects: a prospective randomised trial—the VICOCA study

BACKGROUND: Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) and CT colonography (CTC) are minimally invasive techniques for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Our objective is to compare CCE and CTC for the identification of patients with colorectal neoplasia among participants in a CRC screening programme with posit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: González-Suárez, Begoña, Pagés, Mario, Araujo, Isis Karina, Romero, Cristina, Rodríguez de Miguel, Cristina, Ayuso, Juan Ramón, Pozo, Àngels, Vila-Casadesús, Maria, Serradesanferm, Anna, Ginès, Àngels, Fernández-Esparrach, Glòria, Pellisé, Maria, López-Cerón, María, Flores, David, Córdova, Henry, Sendino, Oriol, Grau, Jaume, Llach, Josep, Serra-Burriel, Miquel, Cárdenas, Andrés, Balaguer, Francesc, Castells, Antoni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32943059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01717-4
_version_ 1783583876186112000
author González-Suárez, Begoña
Pagés, Mario
Araujo, Isis Karina
Romero, Cristina
Rodríguez de Miguel, Cristina
Ayuso, Juan Ramón
Pozo, Àngels
Vila-Casadesús, Maria
Serradesanferm, Anna
Ginès, Àngels
Fernández-Esparrach, Glòria
Pellisé, Maria
López-Cerón, María
Flores, David
Córdova, Henry
Sendino, Oriol
Grau, Jaume
Llach, Josep
Serra-Burriel, Miquel
Cárdenas, Andrés
Balaguer, Francesc
Castells, Antoni
author_facet González-Suárez, Begoña
Pagés, Mario
Araujo, Isis Karina
Romero, Cristina
Rodríguez de Miguel, Cristina
Ayuso, Juan Ramón
Pozo, Àngels
Vila-Casadesús, Maria
Serradesanferm, Anna
Ginès, Àngels
Fernández-Esparrach, Glòria
Pellisé, Maria
López-Cerón, María
Flores, David
Córdova, Henry
Sendino, Oriol
Grau, Jaume
Llach, Josep
Serra-Burriel, Miquel
Cárdenas, Andrés
Balaguer, Francesc
Castells, Antoni
author_sort González-Suárez, Begoña
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) and CT colonography (CTC) are minimally invasive techniques for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Our objective is to compare CCE and CTC for the identification of patients with colorectal neoplasia among participants in a CRC screening programme with positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT). Primary outcome was to compare the performance of CCE and CTC in detecting patients with neoplastic lesions. METHODS: The VICOCA study is a prospective, single-centre, randomised trial conducted from March 2014 to May 2016; 662 individuals were invited and 349 were randomised to CCE or CTC before colonoscopy. Endoscopists were blinded to the results of CCE and CTC. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-nine individuals were included: 173 in the CCE group and 176 in the CTC group. Two hundred ninety individuals agreed to participate: 147 in the CCE group and 143 in the CTC group. In the intention-to-screen analysis, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for the identification of individuals with colorectal neoplasia were 98.1%, 76.6%, 93.7% and 92.0% in the CCE group and 64.9%, 95.7%, 96.8% and 57.7% in the CTC group. In terms of detecting significant neoplastic lesions, the sensitivity of CCE and CTC was 96.1% and 79.3%, respectively. Detection rate for advanced colorectal neoplasm was higher in the CCE group than in the CTC group (100% and 93.1%, respectively; RR = 1.07; p = 0.08). Both CCE and CTC identified all patients with cancer. CCE detected more patients with any lesion than CTC (98.6% and 81.0%, respectively; RR = 1.22; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Although both techniques seem to be similar in detecting patients with advanced colorectal neoplasms, CCE is more sensitive for the detection of any neoplastic lesion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02081742. Registered: September 16, 2013.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7500543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75005432020-09-22 Colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography in FIT-positive colorectal cancer screening subjects: a prospective randomised trial—the VICOCA study González-Suárez, Begoña Pagés, Mario Araujo, Isis Karina Romero, Cristina Rodríguez de Miguel, Cristina Ayuso, Juan Ramón Pozo, Àngels Vila-Casadesús, Maria Serradesanferm, Anna Ginès, Àngels Fernández-Esparrach, Glòria Pellisé, Maria López-Cerón, María Flores, David Córdova, Henry Sendino, Oriol Grau, Jaume Llach, Josep Serra-Burriel, Miquel Cárdenas, Andrés Balaguer, Francesc Castells, Antoni BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) and CT colonography (CTC) are minimally invasive techniques for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Our objective is to compare CCE and CTC for the identification of patients with colorectal neoplasia among participants in a CRC screening programme with positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT). Primary outcome was to compare the performance of CCE and CTC in detecting patients with neoplastic lesions. METHODS: The VICOCA study is a prospective, single-centre, randomised trial conducted from March 2014 to May 2016; 662 individuals were invited and 349 were randomised to CCE or CTC before colonoscopy. Endoscopists were blinded to the results of CCE and CTC. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-nine individuals were included: 173 in the CCE group and 176 in the CTC group. Two hundred ninety individuals agreed to participate: 147 in the CCE group and 143 in the CTC group. In the intention-to-screen analysis, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for the identification of individuals with colorectal neoplasia were 98.1%, 76.6%, 93.7% and 92.0% in the CCE group and 64.9%, 95.7%, 96.8% and 57.7% in the CTC group. In terms of detecting significant neoplastic lesions, the sensitivity of CCE and CTC was 96.1% and 79.3%, respectively. Detection rate for advanced colorectal neoplasm was higher in the CCE group than in the CTC group (100% and 93.1%, respectively; RR = 1.07; p = 0.08). Both CCE and CTC identified all patients with cancer. CCE detected more patients with any lesion than CTC (98.6% and 81.0%, respectively; RR = 1.22; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Although both techniques seem to be similar in detecting patients with advanced colorectal neoplasms, CCE is more sensitive for the detection of any neoplastic lesion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02081742. Registered: September 16, 2013. BioMed Central 2020-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7500543/ /pubmed/32943059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01717-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
González-Suárez, Begoña
Pagés, Mario
Araujo, Isis Karina
Romero, Cristina
Rodríguez de Miguel, Cristina
Ayuso, Juan Ramón
Pozo, Àngels
Vila-Casadesús, Maria
Serradesanferm, Anna
Ginès, Àngels
Fernández-Esparrach, Glòria
Pellisé, Maria
López-Cerón, María
Flores, David
Córdova, Henry
Sendino, Oriol
Grau, Jaume
Llach, Josep
Serra-Burriel, Miquel
Cárdenas, Andrés
Balaguer, Francesc
Castells, Antoni
Colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography in FIT-positive colorectal cancer screening subjects: a prospective randomised trial—the VICOCA study
title Colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography in FIT-positive colorectal cancer screening subjects: a prospective randomised trial—the VICOCA study
title_full Colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography in FIT-positive colorectal cancer screening subjects: a prospective randomised trial—the VICOCA study
title_fullStr Colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography in FIT-positive colorectal cancer screening subjects: a prospective randomised trial—the VICOCA study
title_full_unstemmed Colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography in FIT-positive colorectal cancer screening subjects: a prospective randomised trial—the VICOCA study
title_short Colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography in FIT-positive colorectal cancer screening subjects: a prospective randomised trial—the VICOCA study
title_sort colon capsule endoscopy versus ct colonography in fit-positive colorectal cancer screening subjects: a prospective randomised trial—the vicoca study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32943059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01717-4
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalezsuarezbegona coloncapsuleendoscopyversusctcolonographyinfitpositivecolorectalcancerscreeningsubjectsaprospectiverandomisedtrialthevicocastudy
AT pagesmario coloncapsuleendoscopyversusctcolonographyinfitpositivecolorectalcancerscreeningsubjectsaprospectiverandomisedtrialthevicocastudy
AT araujoisiskarina coloncapsuleendoscopyversusctcolonographyinfitpositivecolorectalcancerscreeningsubjectsaprospectiverandomisedtrialthevicocastudy
AT romerocristina coloncapsuleendoscopyversusctcolonographyinfitpositivecolorectalcancerscreeningsubjectsaprospectiverandomisedtrialthevicocastudy
AT rodriguezdemiguelcristina coloncapsuleendoscopyversusctcolonographyinfitpositivecolorectalcancerscreeningsubjectsaprospectiverandomisedtrialthevicocastudy
AT ayusojuanramon coloncapsuleendoscopyversusctcolonographyinfitpositivecolorectalcancerscreeningsubjectsaprospectiverandomisedtrialthevicocastudy
AT pozoangels coloncapsuleendoscopyversusctcolonographyinfitpositivecolorectalcancerscreeningsubjectsaprospectiverandomisedtrialthevicocastudy
AT vilacasadesusmaria coloncapsuleendoscopyversusctcolonographyinfitpositivecolorectalcancerscreeningsubjectsaprospectiverandomisedtrialthevicocastudy
AT serradesanfermanna coloncapsuleendoscopyversusctcolonographyinfitpositivecolorectalcancerscreeningsubjectsaprospectiverandomisedtrialthevicocastudy
AT ginesangels coloncapsuleendoscopyversusctcolonographyinfitpositivecolorectalcancerscreeningsubjectsaprospectiverandomisedtrialthevicocastudy
AT fernandezesparrachgloria coloncapsuleendoscopyversusctcolonographyinfitpositivecolorectalcancerscreeningsubjectsaprospectiverandomisedtrialthevicocastudy
AT pellisemaria coloncapsuleendoscopyversusctcolonographyinfitpositivecolorectalcancerscreeningsubjectsaprospectiverandomisedtrialthevicocastudy
AT lopezceronmaria coloncapsuleendoscopyversusctcolonographyinfitpositivecolorectalcancerscreeningsubjectsaprospectiverandomisedtrialthevicocastudy
AT floresdavid coloncapsuleendoscopyversusctcolonographyinfitpositivecolorectalcancerscreeningsubjectsaprospectiverandomisedtrialthevicocastudy
AT cordovahenry coloncapsuleendoscopyversusctcolonographyinfitpositivecolorectalcancerscreeningsubjectsaprospectiverandomisedtrialthevicocastudy
AT sendinooriol coloncapsuleendoscopyversusctcolonographyinfitpositivecolorectalcancerscreeningsubjectsaprospectiverandomisedtrialthevicocastudy
AT graujaume coloncapsuleendoscopyversusctcolonographyinfitpositivecolorectalcancerscreeningsubjectsaprospectiverandomisedtrialthevicocastudy
AT llachjosep coloncapsuleendoscopyversusctcolonographyinfitpositivecolorectalcancerscreeningsubjectsaprospectiverandomisedtrialthevicocastudy
AT serraburrielmiquel coloncapsuleendoscopyversusctcolonographyinfitpositivecolorectalcancerscreeningsubjectsaprospectiverandomisedtrialthevicocastudy
AT cardenasandres coloncapsuleendoscopyversusctcolonographyinfitpositivecolorectalcancerscreeningsubjectsaprospectiverandomisedtrialthevicocastudy
AT balaguerfrancesc coloncapsuleendoscopyversusctcolonographyinfitpositivecolorectalcancerscreeningsubjectsaprospectiverandomisedtrialthevicocastudy
AT castellsantoni coloncapsuleendoscopyversusctcolonographyinfitpositivecolorectalcancerscreeningsubjectsaprospectiverandomisedtrialthevicocastudy