Cargando…

Maxillary protraction using customized mini-plates for anchorage in an adolescent girl with skeletal Class III malocclusion

The treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion in adolescents is challenging. Maxillary protraction, particularly that using bone anchorage, has been proven to be an effective method for the stimulation of maxillary growth. However, the conventional procedure, which involves the surgical implantat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Liang, Shuran, Xie, Xianju, Wang, Fan, Chang, Qiao, Wang, Hongmei, Bai, Yuxing
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Korean Association of Orthodontists 2020
Materias:	Case Report
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32938827 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2020.50.5.346

Ejemplares similares

Maxillary protraction using skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics in Skeletal Class III patients
por: Esenlik, Elçin, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Maxillary protraction and vertical control utilizing skeletal anchorage for midfacial-maxillary deficiency
por: MATSUMOTO, Kensuke, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Maxillary protraction with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask versus skeletal anchorage with mini-implants in class III patients: a non-randomized clinical trial
por: de Souza, Ricardo Alves, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Orthopedic and Nonsurgical Orthodontic Treatment of Adolescent Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Using Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction and Temporary Anchorage Devices: A Case Report
por: Alnefaie, Mohammed, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Skeletal Class III malocclusion treatment using mandibular and maxillary skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics: a case report
por: Fakharian, Mehrnaz, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of class II malocclusion treatment using bi-maxillary skeletal anchorage: a systematic review
por: Alhammadi, Maged S., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Treatment Options for Class III Malocclusion in Growing Patients with Emphasis on Maxillary Protraction
por: Azamian, Zeinab, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Severe skeletal Class II Division 1 malocclusion in postpubertal girl treated using Forsus with miniplate anchorage
por: Patil, Harshal Ashok, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Individualized 3D-Printed Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction Device for Growth Modification in Skeletal Class III Malocclusion
por: Kim, Minji, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

3D Printed Customized Facemask for Maxillary Protraction in the Early Treatment of a Class III Malocclusion: Proof-of-Concept Clinical Case
por: Franchi, Lorenzo, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Skeletal versus conventional intraoral anchorage for the treatment of class II malocclusion: dentoalveolar and skeletal effects
por: Mariani, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Bimaxillary Distalization with Skeletal Anchorage for Management of Severe Skeletal Class III Open Bite Malocclusion
por: Alshehri, Abdulrahman
Publicado: (2022)

Clinical effectiveness of different types of bone-anchored maxillary protraction devices for skeletal Class III malocclusion: Systematic review and network meta-analysis
por: Wang, Jiangwei, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Prevalence of maxillary canine impaction in skeletal Class III malocclusions compared to Class I malocclusions
por: Di Carlo, Gabriele, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Does surgically assisted maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage and Class III elastics affect the pharyngeal airway? A retrospective, long-term study
por: Ozbilen, Elvan Onem, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of Movement of the Upper Dentition According to Anchorage Method: Orthodontic Mini-Implant versus Conventional Anchorage Reinforcement in Class I Malocclusion
por: Lee, Ah-Young, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

The Effects of Maxillary Protraction with or without Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Age Factors in Treating Class III Malocclusion: A Meta-Analysis
por: Zhang, Wei, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Treatment of a skeletal Class II malocclusion using fixed functional appliance with miniplate anchorage
por: Celikoglu, Mevlut, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Herbst appliance with skeletal anchorage versus dental anchorage in adolescents with Class II malocclusion: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
por: Batista, Klaus Barretto dos Santos Lopes, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Skeletal Changes in Growing Cleft Patients with Class III Malocclusion Treated with Bone Anchored Maxillary Protraction—A 3.5-Year Follow-Up
por: Steegman, Ralph M., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparison of the effects on the pharyngeal airway space of maxillary protraction appliances according to the methods of anchorage
por: Seo, Won-Gyo, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Preliminary three-dimensional analysis of tooth movement and arch dimension change of the maxillary dentition in Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with first premolar extraction: conventional anchorage vs. mini-implant anchorage
por: Park, Heon-Mook, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

A Retrospective Evaluation of Conventional Rapid Maxillary Expansion versus Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Constriction Protocol Combined with Protraction Headgear in the Management of Developing Skeletal Class III Malocclusion
por: Parayaruthottam, Prathapan, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Zygomatic miniplates for skeletal anchorage in orthopedic correction of Class III malocclusion: A controlled clinical trial
por: Bozkaya, Erdal, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Effectiveness of interceptive treatment of class III malocclusions with skeletal anchorage: A systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Rodríguez de Guzmán-Barrera, Jorge, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Three-dimensional evaluation of tooth movement in Class II malocclusions treated without extraction by orthodontic mini-implant anchorage
por: Ali, Dler, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

New approach of maxillary protraction using modified C-palatal plates in Class III patients
por: Kook, Yoon-Ah, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Effects of the long-term use of maxillary protraction facemasks with skeletal anchorage on pharyngeal airway dimensions in growing patients with cleft lip and palate
por: Kim, Jung-Eun, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Effects of different force directions of intra-oral skeletally anchored maxillary protraction on craniomaxillofacial complex, in Class III malocclusion: a 3D finite element analysis
por: GARG, Dhiraj, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Maxillary protraction in adult cleft lip and palate by a rigid external distraction device with dentoskeletal anchorage
por: Akarsu, Bengisu, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Management of skeletal Cl III malocclusion using simultaneous alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction (Alt-RAMEC) and facemask protraction in adolescence
por: Singh, Harpreet, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Class II correction by maxillary en masse distalization using a completely customized lingual appliance and a novel mini-screw anchorage concept – preliminary results
por: Beyling, Frauke, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparison of anchorage reinforcement with temporary anchorage devices or a Herbst appliance during lingual orthodontic protraction of mandibular molars without maxillary counterbalance extraction
por: Metzner, Rebecca, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Efficacy and safety of micro-implant anchorage in Angle class II malocclusion orthodontic treatment: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Wang, Kaiting, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Management of Class II malocclusion with ectopic maxillary canines
por: Mascarenhas, Rohan, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Treatment Approach for Maxillary Hypoplasia in Cleft Patients: Class III Elastics with Skeletal Anchorage (Report of Two Cases)
por: Jahanbin, Arezoo, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Maxillary molar distalization with MGBM-system in class II malocclusion
por: Maino, Giuliano, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Therapeutic approach in Class I malocclusion with impacted maxillary canines
por: PITHON, Matheus Melo
Publicado: (2022)

Orthodontic camouflage treatment of pseudo‐Class III malocclusion on skeletal class III Base complicated with canine impaction treated with temporary anchorage devices: A case report
por: Alotaibi, Saud
Publicado: (2023)

Construction of Customized Palatal Orthodontic Devices on Skeletal Anchorage Using Biomechanical Modeling
por: Suetenkov, Dmitriy, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_aluo9oi14d6s0hvmq53ck5mucl