Cargando…
Multi-site benchmarking of clinical (13)C RF coils at 3T
A quality assurance protocol for RF coils is proposed, which can be used for volume (Tx/Rx) and surface (Rx) coils. Following this protocol, a benchmarking of seven coils (from three different MR sites) dedicated to (13)C MRI at 3T is reported. Coil performance is particularly important for 3T MRI a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7501735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32755748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2020.106798 |
_version_ | 1783584088974688256 |
---|---|
author | Sánchez-Heredia, Juan Diego Olin, Rie B. McLean, Mary A. Laustsen, Christoffer Hansen, Adam E. Hanson, Lars G. Ardenkjær-Larsen, Jan Henrik |
author_facet | Sánchez-Heredia, Juan Diego Olin, Rie B. McLean, Mary A. Laustsen, Christoffer Hansen, Adam E. Hanson, Lars G. Ardenkjær-Larsen, Jan Henrik |
author_sort | Sánchez-Heredia, Juan Diego |
collection | PubMed |
description | A quality assurance protocol for RF coils is proposed, which can be used for volume (Tx/Rx) and surface (Rx) coils. Following this protocol, a benchmarking of seven coils (from three different MR sites) dedicated to (13)C MRI at 3T is reported. Coil performance is particularly important for 3T MRI at the (13)C frequency, since the coil-to-sample noise ratio is typically high. The coils are evaluated experimentally using the proposed protocol based on MR spectroscopic imaging performed with two different phantoms: one head-shaped, and one with cylindrical shape and nearly twice the volume of the first one. To achieve an unbiased SNR comparison of volume and array coils, coil combination was done using sensitivity profiles extracted from the data. SNR, noise correlation matrices and example g-factor maps are reported. For globally calibrated, equal excitation angles, the measured SNR shows large differences for the volume coils of up to 115% at the phantom center for a head phantom. The arrays show lower differences in superficial SNR. The sample surface depth at which the volume coils outperform the arrays is estimated to 7 cm, and SNR furthest away from the coil surface is 28% lower for the best array compared to the best volume coil. A broad set of coils for (13)C at 3T have been benchmarked. The results reported, and the method used to benchmark them, should guide the (13)C community to choose the most suitable coil for a given experiment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7501735 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75017352020-09-28 Multi-site benchmarking of clinical (13)C RF coils at 3T Sánchez-Heredia, Juan Diego Olin, Rie B. McLean, Mary A. Laustsen, Christoffer Hansen, Adam E. Hanson, Lars G. Ardenkjær-Larsen, Jan Henrik J Magn Reson Article A quality assurance protocol for RF coils is proposed, which can be used for volume (Tx/Rx) and surface (Rx) coils. Following this protocol, a benchmarking of seven coils (from three different MR sites) dedicated to (13)C MRI at 3T is reported. Coil performance is particularly important for 3T MRI at the (13)C frequency, since the coil-to-sample noise ratio is typically high. The coils are evaluated experimentally using the proposed protocol based on MR spectroscopic imaging performed with two different phantoms: one head-shaped, and one with cylindrical shape and nearly twice the volume of the first one. To achieve an unbiased SNR comparison of volume and array coils, coil combination was done using sensitivity profiles extracted from the data. SNR, noise correlation matrices and example g-factor maps are reported. For globally calibrated, equal excitation angles, the measured SNR shows large differences for the volume coils of up to 115% at the phantom center for a head phantom. The arrays show lower differences in superficial SNR. The sample surface depth at which the volume coils outperform the arrays is estimated to 7 cm, and SNR furthest away from the coil surface is 28% lower for the best array compared to the best volume coil. A broad set of coils for (13)C at 3T have been benchmarked. The results reported, and the method used to benchmark them, should guide the (13)C community to choose the most suitable coil for a given experiment. Elsevier 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7501735/ /pubmed/32755748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2020.106798 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sánchez-Heredia, Juan Diego Olin, Rie B. McLean, Mary A. Laustsen, Christoffer Hansen, Adam E. Hanson, Lars G. Ardenkjær-Larsen, Jan Henrik Multi-site benchmarking of clinical (13)C RF coils at 3T |
title | Multi-site benchmarking of clinical (13)C RF coils at 3T |
title_full | Multi-site benchmarking of clinical (13)C RF coils at 3T |
title_fullStr | Multi-site benchmarking of clinical (13)C RF coils at 3T |
title_full_unstemmed | Multi-site benchmarking of clinical (13)C RF coils at 3T |
title_short | Multi-site benchmarking of clinical (13)C RF coils at 3T |
title_sort | multi-site benchmarking of clinical (13)c rf coils at 3t |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7501735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32755748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2020.106798 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sanchezherediajuandiego multisitebenchmarkingofclinical13crfcoilsat3t AT olinrieb multisitebenchmarkingofclinical13crfcoilsat3t AT mcleanmarya multisitebenchmarkingofclinical13crfcoilsat3t AT laustsenchristoffer multisitebenchmarkingofclinical13crfcoilsat3t AT hansenadame multisitebenchmarkingofclinical13crfcoilsat3t AT hansonlarsg multisitebenchmarkingofclinical13crfcoilsat3t AT ardenkjærlarsenjanhenrik multisitebenchmarkingofclinical13crfcoilsat3t |