Cargando…

Nonlinear biomarker interactions in conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease

Multiple biomarkers can capture different facets of Alzheimer's disease. However, statistical models of biomarkers to predict outcomes in Alzheimer's rarely model nonlinear interactions between these measures. Here, we used Gaussian Processes to address this, modelling nonlinear interactio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Popescu, Sebastian G., Whittington, Alex, Gunn, Roger N., Matthews, Paul M., Glocker, Ben, Sharp, David J, Cole, James H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7502835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32643852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25133
_version_ 1783584273711759360
author Popescu, Sebastian G.
Whittington, Alex
Gunn, Roger N.
Matthews, Paul M.
Glocker, Ben
Sharp, David J
Cole, James H
author_facet Popescu, Sebastian G.
Whittington, Alex
Gunn, Roger N.
Matthews, Paul M.
Glocker, Ben
Sharp, David J
Cole, James H
author_sort Popescu, Sebastian G.
collection PubMed
description Multiple biomarkers can capture different facets of Alzheimer's disease. However, statistical models of biomarkers to predict outcomes in Alzheimer's rarely model nonlinear interactions between these measures. Here, we used Gaussian Processes to address this, modelling nonlinear interactions to predict progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's over 3 years, using Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) data. Measures included: demographics, APOE4 genotype, CSF (amyloid‐β42, total tau, phosphorylated tau), [18(F)]florbetapir, hippocampal volume and brain‐age. We examined: (a) the independent value of each biomarker; and (b) whether modelling nonlinear interactions between biomarkers improved predictions. Each measured added complementary information when predicting conversion to Alzheimer's. A linear model classifying stable from progressive MCI explained over half the variance (R(2) = 0.51, p < .001); the strongest independently contributing biomarker was hippocampal volume (R(2) = 0.13). When comparing sensitivity of different models to progressive MCI (independent biomarker models, additive models, nonlinear interaction models), we observed a significant improvement (p < .001) for various two‐way interaction models. The best performing model included an interaction between amyloid‐β‐PET and P‐tau, while accounting for hippocampal volume (sensitivity = 0.77, AUC = 0.826). Closely related biomarkers contributed uniquely to predict conversion to Alzheimer's. Nonlinear biomarker interactions were also implicated, and results showed that although for some patients adding additional biomarkers may add little value (i.e., when hippocampal volume is high), for others (i.e., with low hippocampal volume) further invasive and expensive examination may be warranted. Our framework enables visualisation of these interactions, in individual patient biomarker ‘space', providing information for personalised or stratified healthcare or clinical trial design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7502835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75028352020-09-28 Nonlinear biomarker interactions in conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease Popescu, Sebastian G. Whittington, Alex Gunn, Roger N. Matthews, Paul M. Glocker, Ben Sharp, David J Cole, James H Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Multiple biomarkers can capture different facets of Alzheimer's disease. However, statistical models of biomarkers to predict outcomes in Alzheimer's rarely model nonlinear interactions between these measures. Here, we used Gaussian Processes to address this, modelling nonlinear interactions to predict progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's over 3 years, using Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) data. Measures included: demographics, APOE4 genotype, CSF (amyloid‐β42, total tau, phosphorylated tau), [18(F)]florbetapir, hippocampal volume and brain‐age. We examined: (a) the independent value of each biomarker; and (b) whether modelling nonlinear interactions between biomarkers improved predictions. Each measured added complementary information when predicting conversion to Alzheimer's. A linear model classifying stable from progressive MCI explained over half the variance (R(2) = 0.51, p < .001); the strongest independently contributing biomarker was hippocampal volume (R(2) = 0.13). When comparing sensitivity of different models to progressive MCI (independent biomarker models, additive models, nonlinear interaction models), we observed a significant improvement (p < .001) for various two‐way interaction models. The best performing model included an interaction between amyloid‐β‐PET and P‐tau, while accounting for hippocampal volume (sensitivity = 0.77, AUC = 0.826). Closely related biomarkers contributed uniquely to predict conversion to Alzheimer's. Nonlinear biomarker interactions were also implicated, and results showed that although for some patients adding additional biomarkers may add little value (i.e., when hippocampal volume is high), for others (i.e., with low hippocampal volume) further invasive and expensive examination may be warranted. Our framework enables visualisation of these interactions, in individual patient biomarker ‘space', providing information for personalised or stratified healthcare or clinical trial design. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7502835/ /pubmed/32643852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25133 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Popescu, Sebastian G.
Whittington, Alex
Gunn, Roger N.
Matthews, Paul M.
Glocker, Ben
Sharp, David J
Cole, James H
Nonlinear biomarker interactions in conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease
title Nonlinear biomarker interactions in conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease
title_full Nonlinear biomarker interactions in conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease
title_fullStr Nonlinear biomarker interactions in conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease
title_full_unstemmed Nonlinear biomarker interactions in conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease
title_short Nonlinear biomarker interactions in conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease
title_sort nonlinear biomarker interactions in conversion from mild cognitive impairment to alzheimer's disease
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7502835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32643852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25133
work_keys_str_mv AT popescusebastiang nonlinearbiomarkerinteractionsinconversionfrommildcognitiveimpairmenttoalzheimersdisease
AT whittingtonalex nonlinearbiomarkerinteractionsinconversionfrommildcognitiveimpairmenttoalzheimersdisease
AT gunnrogern nonlinearbiomarkerinteractionsinconversionfrommildcognitiveimpairmenttoalzheimersdisease
AT matthewspaulm nonlinearbiomarkerinteractionsinconversionfrommildcognitiveimpairmenttoalzheimersdisease
AT glockerben nonlinearbiomarkerinteractionsinconversionfrommildcognitiveimpairmenttoalzheimersdisease
AT sharpdavidj nonlinearbiomarkerinteractionsinconversionfrommildcognitiveimpairmenttoalzheimersdisease
AT colejamesh nonlinearbiomarkerinteractionsinconversionfrommildcognitiveimpairmenttoalzheimersdisease
AT nonlinearbiomarkerinteractionsinconversionfrommildcognitiveimpairmenttoalzheimersdisease