Cargando…
Assessment of biorisk management systems in high containment laboratories, 18 countries in Europe, 2016 and 2017
Europe-wide activities to improve biosafety and biosecurity performed within the frameworks of the European Union (EU)-funded Joint Actions EMERGE and QUANDHIP led to the development of an Integrated European Checklist for Laboratory Biorisk Management (ECL). To better understand different approache...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7502897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32914748 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.36.2000089 |
_version_ | 1783584283540062208 |
---|---|
author | Appelt, Sandra Jacob, Daniela Rohleder, Anna-Maria Bråve, Andreas Szekely Björndal, Åsa Di Caro, Antonino Grunow, Roland |
author_facet | Appelt, Sandra Jacob, Daniela Rohleder, Anna-Maria Bråve, Andreas Szekely Björndal, Åsa Di Caro, Antonino Grunow, Roland |
author_sort | Appelt, Sandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Europe-wide activities to improve biosafety and biosecurity performed within the frameworks of the European Union (EU)-funded Joint Actions EMERGE and QUANDHIP led to the development of an Integrated European Checklist for Laboratory Biorisk Management (ECL). To better understand different approaches shaping biorisk management (BRM) systems on an operational level in high containment laboratories, the ECL was used to map the implementation of BRM in 32 high containment laboratories in 18 countries in Europe. The results suggest that the BRM elements referring to standard microbiological working practices and the handling of infectious material were fulfilled particularly well. The elements safety exercises involving internal and external emergency responders, and appropriate decommissioning plans were not fulfilled particularly well. BRM in Biosafety Level (BSL) 4 laboratories handling Risk Group (RG) 4 viruses appear to vary among each other less than BSL3 laboratories handling RG 3 bacteria. It is important to agree on comparable regulations in Europe as high containment laboratories are indispensable for a safe, quick and effective response to public health threats. As high containment laboratories may also present a public health risk it is crucial to have robust BRM on organisational and operational levels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7502897 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75028972020-09-28 Assessment of biorisk management systems in high containment laboratories, 18 countries in Europe, 2016 and 2017 Appelt, Sandra Jacob, Daniela Rohleder, Anna-Maria Bråve, Andreas Szekely Björndal, Åsa Di Caro, Antonino Grunow, Roland Euro Surveill Perspective Europe-wide activities to improve biosafety and biosecurity performed within the frameworks of the European Union (EU)-funded Joint Actions EMERGE and QUANDHIP led to the development of an Integrated European Checklist for Laboratory Biorisk Management (ECL). To better understand different approaches shaping biorisk management (BRM) systems on an operational level in high containment laboratories, the ECL was used to map the implementation of BRM in 32 high containment laboratories in 18 countries in Europe. The results suggest that the BRM elements referring to standard microbiological working practices and the handling of infectious material were fulfilled particularly well. The elements safety exercises involving internal and external emergency responders, and appropriate decommissioning plans were not fulfilled particularly well. BRM in Biosafety Level (BSL) 4 laboratories handling Risk Group (RG) 4 viruses appear to vary among each other less than BSL3 laboratories handling RG 3 bacteria. It is important to agree on comparable regulations in Europe as high containment laboratories are indispensable for a safe, quick and effective response to public health threats. As high containment laboratories may also present a public health risk it is crucial to have robust BRM on organisational and operational levels. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2020-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7502897/ /pubmed/32914748 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.36.2000089 Text en This article is copyright of the authors or their affiliated institutions, 2020. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Perspective Appelt, Sandra Jacob, Daniela Rohleder, Anna-Maria Bråve, Andreas Szekely Björndal, Åsa Di Caro, Antonino Grunow, Roland Assessment of biorisk management systems in high containment laboratories, 18 countries in Europe, 2016 and 2017 |
title | Assessment of biorisk management systems in high containment laboratories, 18 countries in Europe, 2016 and 2017 |
title_full | Assessment of biorisk management systems in high containment laboratories, 18 countries in Europe, 2016 and 2017 |
title_fullStr | Assessment of biorisk management systems in high containment laboratories, 18 countries in Europe, 2016 and 2017 |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of biorisk management systems in high containment laboratories, 18 countries in Europe, 2016 and 2017 |
title_short | Assessment of biorisk management systems in high containment laboratories, 18 countries in Europe, 2016 and 2017 |
title_sort | assessment of biorisk management systems in high containment laboratories, 18 countries in europe, 2016 and 2017 |
topic | Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7502897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32914748 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.36.2000089 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT appeltsandra assessmentofbioriskmanagementsystemsinhighcontainmentlaboratories18countriesineurope2016and2017 AT jacobdaniela assessmentofbioriskmanagementsystemsinhighcontainmentlaboratories18countriesineurope2016and2017 AT rohlederannamaria assessmentofbioriskmanagementsystemsinhighcontainmentlaboratories18countriesineurope2016and2017 AT braveandreas assessmentofbioriskmanagementsystemsinhighcontainmentlaboratories18countriesineurope2016and2017 AT szekelybjorndalasa assessmentofbioriskmanagementsystemsinhighcontainmentlaboratories18countriesineurope2016and2017 AT dicaroantonino assessmentofbioriskmanagementsystemsinhighcontainmentlaboratories18countriesineurope2016and2017 AT grunowroland assessmentofbioriskmanagementsystemsinhighcontainmentlaboratories18countriesineurope2016and2017 AT assessmentofbioriskmanagementsystemsinhighcontainmentlaboratories18countriesineurope2016and2017 |