Cargando…

Use of ultrasound guidance in central venous catheter placement by emergency physicians in Saudi Arabia

OBJECTIVES: To determine the ultrasound guidance for central venous catheter (USG-CVC) placement rate of emergency physicians (EPs) in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study regarding the respondents’ demographic profiles, formal and informal training in USG-CVC placement,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aseri, Zohair A. Al, Hussein, Reema M. Al, Malabarey, Mohammed A., Yahya, Bader A. Al, Moaiqel, Faisal A. Al, Ansari, Mariam A. Al, Alrajhi, Khaled N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Saudi Medical Journal 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7502917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32601636
http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2020.7.25162
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To determine the ultrasound guidance for central venous catheter (USG-CVC) placement rate of emergency physicians (EPs) in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study regarding the respondents’ demographic profiles, formal and informal training in USG-CVC placement, experiences, and attitudes towards the procedure was emailed to all EPs registered with the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS) between October and December 2018. RESULTS: In total, 234/350 SCFHS-registered EPs completed the survey; the response rate was 66.9%. Most respondents (70.5%) were board-certified in emergency medicine (EM). Ninety percent indicated that US device for CVC placement assistance was available. Most EPs (78.2%) had performed USG-CVC placement; the US usage rate correlated significantly with recent graduation from residency (p=0.048). In total, 83.3% received formal training during residency. Of the 234 respondents, 53.8% felt extremely comfortable with CVC placement with USG and 19.7% without USG (p<0.01). Nevertheless, most respondents desired further USG-CVC training. CONCLUSION: Despite existing evidence and a consensus on its superiority over the landmark technique, USG-CVC placement has not been adopted by a small proportion of EPs into clinical practice. Formal training, education, and institutional provision of permanent onsite US machines may address any barriers.