Cargando…

X-Ray Hesitancy: Patients’ Radiophobic Concerns Over Medical X-rays

All too often the family physician, orthopedic surgeon, dentist or chiropractor is met with radiophobic concerns about X-ray imaging in the clinical setting. These concerns, however, are unwarranted fears based on common but ill-informed and perpetuated ideology versus current understanding of the e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oakley, Paul A., Harrison, Deed E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7503016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32994755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325820959542
_version_ 1783584310231564288
author Oakley, Paul A.
Harrison, Deed E.
author_facet Oakley, Paul A.
Harrison, Deed E.
author_sort Oakley, Paul A.
collection PubMed
description All too often the family physician, orthopedic surgeon, dentist or chiropractor is met with radiophobic concerns about X-ray imaging in the clinical setting. These concerns, however, are unwarranted fears based on common but ill-informed and perpetuated ideology versus current understanding of the effects of low-dose radiation exposures. Themes of X-ray hesitancy come in 3 forms: 1. All radiation exposures are harmful (i.e. carcinogenic); 2. Radiation exposures are cumulative; 3. Children are more susceptible to radiation. Herein we address these concerns and find that low-dose radiation activates the body’s adaptive responses and leads to reduced cancers. Low-dose radiation is not cumulative as long as enough time (e.g. 24 hrs) passes prior to a repeated exposure, and any damage is repaired, removed, or eliminated. Children have more active immune systems; the literature shows children are no more affected than adults by radiation exposures. Medical X-rays present a small, insignificant addition to background radiation exposure that is not likely to cause harm. Doctors and patients alike should be better informed of the lack of risks from diagnostic radiation and the decision to image should rely on the best evidence, unique needs of the patient, and the expertise of the physician—not radiophobia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7503016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75030162020-09-28 X-Ray Hesitancy: Patients’ Radiophobic Concerns Over Medical X-rays Oakley, Paul A. Harrison, Deed E. Dose Response Commentary All too often the family physician, orthopedic surgeon, dentist or chiropractor is met with radiophobic concerns about X-ray imaging in the clinical setting. These concerns, however, are unwarranted fears based on common but ill-informed and perpetuated ideology versus current understanding of the effects of low-dose radiation exposures. Themes of X-ray hesitancy come in 3 forms: 1. All radiation exposures are harmful (i.e. carcinogenic); 2. Radiation exposures are cumulative; 3. Children are more susceptible to radiation. Herein we address these concerns and find that low-dose radiation activates the body’s adaptive responses and leads to reduced cancers. Low-dose radiation is not cumulative as long as enough time (e.g. 24 hrs) passes prior to a repeated exposure, and any damage is repaired, removed, or eliminated. Children have more active immune systems; the literature shows children are no more affected than adults by radiation exposures. Medical X-rays present a small, insignificant addition to background radiation exposure that is not likely to cause harm. Doctors and patients alike should be better informed of the lack of risks from diagnostic radiation and the decision to image should rely on the best evidence, unique needs of the patient, and the expertise of the physician—not radiophobia. SAGE Publications 2020-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7503016/ /pubmed/32994755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325820959542 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Commentary
Oakley, Paul A.
Harrison, Deed E.
X-Ray Hesitancy: Patients’ Radiophobic Concerns Over Medical X-rays
title X-Ray Hesitancy: Patients’ Radiophobic Concerns Over Medical X-rays
title_full X-Ray Hesitancy: Patients’ Radiophobic Concerns Over Medical X-rays
title_fullStr X-Ray Hesitancy: Patients’ Radiophobic Concerns Over Medical X-rays
title_full_unstemmed X-Ray Hesitancy: Patients’ Radiophobic Concerns Over Medical X-rays
title_short X-Ray Hesitancy: Patients’ Radiophobic Concerns Over Medical X-rays
title_sort x-ray hesitancy: patients’ radiophobic concerns over medical x-rays
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7503016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32994755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325820959542
work_keys_str_mv AT oakleypaula xrayhesitancypatientsradiophobicconcernsovermedicalxrays
AT harrisondeede xrayhesitancypatientsradiophobicconcernsovermedicalxrays