Cargando…

Environmental contamination related to SARS-CoV-2 in ICU patients

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak is a primary global concern, and data are lacking concerning risk of novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) environmental contamination. OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 environmental contamina...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lomont, Alexandra, Boubaya, Marouane, Khamis, Warda, Deslandes, Antoine, Cordel, Hugues, Seytre, Delphine, Alloui, Chakib, Malaure, Célie, Bonnet, Nicolas, Carbonnelle, Etienne, Cohen, Yves, Nunes, Hilario, Bouchaud, Olivier, Zahar, Jean-Ralph, Tandjaoui-Lambiotte, Yacine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Respiratory Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7503055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33257911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00595-2020
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak is a primary global concern, and data are lacking concerning risk of novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) environmental contamination. OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 environmental contamination in COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A prospective single centre 1-day study was carried out in an ICU. Four surfaces (the ventilator control screen, the control buttons of the syringe pump, the bed rails and the computer table located >1 m away from the patient) were systematically swabbed at least 8 h after any cleaning process. We analysed clinical, microbiological and radiological data to identify risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 environmental contamination. RESULTS: 40% of ICU patients were found to contaminate their environment. No particular trend emerged regarding the type of surface contaminated. Modality of oxygen support (high-flow nasal cannula oxygenation, invasive mechanical ventilation, standard oxygen mask) was not associated with the risk of environmental contamination. Univariate analysis showed that lymphopenia <0.7×10(9)·L(−1) was associated with environmental contamination. CONCLUSION: Despite small sample size, our study generated surprising results. Modality of oxygen support is not associated with risk of environmental contamination. Further studies are needed.