Cargando…

Validation of 24‐h dietary recall for estimating nutrient intakes and adequacy in adolescents in Burkina Faso

Data on dietary nutrient intakes of adolescents in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMIC) is lacking partly due to the absence of validation studies of the 24‐h recall method in adolescents. We conducted a validation study of 24‐h recall (24HR) compared with observed weighed records (OWR) in adoles...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arsenault, Joanne E., Moursi, Mourad, Olney, Deanna K., Becquey, Elodie, Ganaba, Rasmané
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7503205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13014
_version_ 1783584342245638144
author Arsenault, Joanne E.
Moursi, Mourad
Olney, Deanna K.
Becquey, Elodie
Ganaba, Rasmané
author_facet Arsenault, Joanne E.
Moursi, Mourad
Olney, Deanna K.
Becquey, Elodie
Ganaba, Rasmané
author_sort Arsenault, Joanne E.
collection PubMed
description Data on dietary nutrient intakes of adolescents in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMIC) is lacking partly due to the absence of validation studies of the 24‐h recall method in adolescents. We conducted a validation study of 24‐h recall (24HR) compared with observed weighed records (OWR) in adolescents (n = 132, 10–11 years; n = 105, 12–14 years). Dietary data were collected for the same day by both methods by conducting the 24HR the day after the OWR. For OWR, all foods consumed by adolescents from the first to last meal of the day were weighed; for 24HR adolescents reported foods consumed using portion aids. Food intakes were converted to nutrients. Nutrient intakes by both methods were tested for equivalence by comparing the ratios (24HR/OWR) with equivalence margins of within ±10%, 15% and 20% of the ratio. Prevalences of inadequacy (POIs) were obtained using the NCI method. Mean ratios for energy were 0.88 and 0.92, for younger and older adolescents, respectively, and other nutrients ranged between 0.84 and 1.02. Energy intakes were equivalent within the 15% bound, and most nutrients fell within the 20% bound. POI was overestimated by 24HR, but differences were less than 25 percentage points for most nutrients. Half of adolescents omitted foods in recalls, mainly sweet or savoury snacks, fruits and beverages. Our study showed that adolescents underestimated intakes by 24HR; however, the degree of underestimation was generally acceptable for 12–14‐year‐olds within a bound of 15%. Errors could possibly be reduced with further training and targeted probing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7503205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75032052020-09-28 Validation of 24‐h dietary recall for estimating nutrient intakes and adequacy in adolescents in Burkina Faso Arsenault, Joanne E. Moursi, Mourad Olney, Deanna K. Becquey, Elodie Ganaba, Rasmané Matern Child Nutr Original Articles Data on dietary nutrient intakes of adolescents in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMIC) is lacking partly due to the absence of validation studies of the 24‐h recall method in adolescents. We conducted a validation study of 24‐h recall (24HR) compared with observed weighed records (OWR) in adolescents (n = 132, 10–11 years; n = 105, 12–14 years). Dietary data were collected for the same day by both methods by conducting the 24HR the day after the OWR. For OWR, all foods consumed by adolescents from the first to last meal of the day were weighed; for 24HR adolescents reported foods consumed using portion aids. Food intakes were converted to nutrients. Nutrient intakes by both methods were tested for equivalence by comparing the ratios (24HR/OWR) with equivalence margins of within ±10%, 15% and 20% of the ratio. Prevalences of inadequacy (POIs) were obtained using the NCI method. Mean ratios for energy were 0.88 and 0.92, for younger and older adolescents, respectively, and other nutrients ranged between 0.84 and 1.02. Energy intakes were equivalent within the 15% bound, and most nutrients fell within the 20% bound. POI was overestimated by 24HR, but differences were less than 25 percentage points for most nutrients. Half of adolescents omitted foods in recalls, mainly sweet or savoury snacks, fruits and beverages. Our study showed that adolescents underestimated intakes by 24HR; however, the degree of underestimation was generally acceptable for 12–14‐year‐olds within a bound of 15%. Errors could possibly be reduced with further training and targeted probing. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7503205/ /pubmed/32337835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13014 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Maternal & Child Nutrition published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Arsenault, Joanne E.
Moursi, Mourad
Olney, Deanna K.
Becquey, Elodie
Ganaba, Rasmané
Validation of 24‐h dietary recall for estimating nutrient intakes and adequacy in adolescents in Burkina Faso
title Validation of 24‐h dietary recall for estimating nutrient intakes and adequacy in adolescents in Burkina Faso
title_full Validation of 24‐h dietary recall for estimating nutrient intakes and adequacy in adolescents in Burkina Faso
title_fullStr Validation of 24‐h dietary recall for estimating nutrient intakes and adequacy in adolescents in Burkina Faso
title_full_unstemmed Validation of 24‐h dietary recall for estimating nutrient intakes and adequacy in adolescents in Burkina Faso
title_short Validation of 24‐h dietary recall for estimating nutrient intakes and adequacy in adolescents in Burkina Faso
title_sort validation of 24‐h dietary recall for estimating nutrient intakes and adequacy in adolescents in burkina faso
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7503205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13014
work_keys_str_mv AT arsenaultjoannee validationof24hdietaryrecallforestimatingnutrientintakesandadequacyinadolescentsinburkinafaso
AT moursimourad validationof24hdietaryrecallforestimatingnutrientintakesandadequacyinadolescentsinburkinafaso
AT olneydeannak validationof24hdietaryrecallforestimatingnutrientintakesandadequacyinadolescentsinburkinafaso
AT becqueyelodie validationof24hdietaryrecallforestimatingnutrientintakesandadequacyinadolescentsinburkinafaso
AT ganabarasmane validationof24hdietaryrecallforestimatingnutrientintakesandadequacyinadolescentsinburkinafaso