Cargando…
Key Factors Related to Short Course 100 m Breaststroke Performance
Background and aim: To identify kinematic variables related to short course 100 m breaststroke performance. Methods: An automatic race analysis system was utilized to obtain start (0–15 m), turn (5 m before the wall until 10 m out), finish (95–100 m), and clean swimming (the rest of the race) segmen...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7503867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32867383 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176257 |
_version_ | 1783584491909939200 |
---|---|
author | Olstad, Bjørn Harald Wathne, Henrik Gonjo, Tomohiro |
author_facet | Olstad, Bjørn Harald Wathne, Henrik Gonjo, Tomohiro |
author_sort | Olstad, Bjørn Harald |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and aim: To identify kinematic variables related to short course 100 m breaststroke performance. Methods: An automatic race analysis system was utilized to obtain start (0–15 m), turn (5 m before the wall until 10 m out), finish (95–100 m), and clean swimming (the rest of the race) segment times as well as cycle rate and cycle length during each swimming cycle from 15 male swimmers during a 100 m breaststroke race. A bivariate correlation and a partial correlation were employed to assess the relationship between each variable and swimming time. Results: Turns were the largest time contributor to the finishing time (44.30 ± 0.58%), followed by clean swimming (38.93 ± 0.50%), start (11.39 ± 0.22%), and finish (5.36 ± 0.18%). The finishing time was correlated (p < 0.001) with start segment time (r = 0.979), clean swimming time (r = 0.940), and 10 m turn-out time (r = 0.829). The clean swimming time was associated with the finishing time, but cycle rate and cycle length were not. In both start and turns, the peak velocity (i.e., take-off and push-off velocity) and the transition velocity were related to the segment time (r ≤ −0.673, p ≤ 0.006). Conclusions: Breaststroke training should focus on: (I) 15 m start with generating high take-off velocity, (II) improving clean swimming velocity by finding an optimal balance between cycle length and rate, (III) 10 m turn-out with maintaining a strong wall push-off, and (IV) establishing a high transition velocity from underwater to surface swimming. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7503867 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75038672020-09-27 Key Factors Related to Short Course 100 m Breaststroke Performance Olstad, Bjørn Harald Wathne, Henrik Gonjo, Tomohiro Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background and aim: To identify kinematic variables related to short course 100 m breaststroke performance. Methods: An automatic race analysis system was utilized to obtain start (0–15 m), turn (5 m before the wall until 10 m out), finish (95–100 m), and clean swimming (the rest of the race) segment times as well as cycle rate and cycle length during each swimming cycle from 15 male swimmers during a 100 m breaststroke race. A bivariate correlation and a partial correlation were employed to assess the relationship between each variable and swimming time. Results: Turns were the largest time contributor to the finishing time (44.30 ± 0.58%), followed by clean swimming (38.93 ± 0.50%), start (11.39 ± 0.22%), and finish (5.36 ± 0.18%). The finishing time was correlated (p < 0.001) with start segment time (r = 0.979), clean swimming time (r = 0.940), and 10 m turn-out time (r = 0.829). The clean swimming time was associated with the finishing time, but cycle rate and cycle length were not. In both start and turns, the peak velocity (i.e., take-off and push-off velocity) and the transition velocity were related to the segment time (r ≤ −0.673, p ≤ 0.006). Conclusions: Breaststroke training should focus on: (I) 15 m start with generating high take-off velocity, (II) improving clean swimming velocity by finding an optimal balance between cycle length and rate, (III) 10 m turn-out with maintaining a strong wall push-off, and (IV) establishing a high transition velocity from underwater to surface swimming. MDPI 2020-08-27 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7503867/ /pubmed/32867383 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176257 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Olstad, Bjørn Harald Wathne, Henrik Gonjo, Tomohiro Key Factors Related to Short Course 100 m Breaststroke Performance |
title | Key Factors Related to Short Course 100 m Breaststroke Performance |
title_full | Key Factors Related to Short Course 100 m Breaststroke Performance |
title_fullStr | Key Factors Related to Short Course 100 m Breaststroke Performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Key Factors Related to Short Course 100 m Breaststroke Performance |
title_short | Key Factors Related to Short Course 100 m Breaststroke Performance |
title_sort | key factors related to short course 100 m breaststroke performance |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7503867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32867383 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176257 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT olstadbjørnharald keyfactorsrelatedtoshortcourse100mbreaststrokeperformance AT wathnehenrik keyfactorsrelatedtoshortcourse100mbreaststrokeperformance AT gonjotomohiro keyfactorsrelatedtoshortcourse100mbreaststrokeperformance |