Cargando…

A Comparison Study of Posture and Fatigue of Neck According to Monitor Types (Moving and Fixed Monitor) by Using Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon (FRP) and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA)

This study quantified the neck posture and fatigue using the flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) and craniovertebral angle (CVA); further, it compared the difference between the level of fatigue and neck posture induced by two types of monitors (regular fixed monitor and moving monitor). Twenty-thre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Kyeong-Hee, Cho, Min-Uk, Park, Chae-Won, Kim, Seoung-Yeon, Kim, Min-Jung, Hong, Boram, Kong, Yong-Ku
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7504159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32878184
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176345
_version_ 1783584560274997248
author Choi, Kyeong-Hee
Cho, Min-Uk
Park, Chae-Won
Kim, Seoung-Yeon
Kim, Min-Jung
Hong, Boram
Kong, Yong-Ku
author_facet Choi, Kyeong-Hee
Cho, Min-Uk
Park, Chae-Won
Kim, Seoung-Yeon
Kim, Min-Jung
Hong, Boram
Kong, Yong-Ku
author_sort Choi, Kyeong-Hee
collection PubMed
description This study quantified the neck posture and fatigue using the flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) and craniovertebral angle (CVA); further, it compared the difference between the level of fatigue and neck posture induced by two types of monitors (regular fixed monitor and moving monitor). Twenty-three male participants were classified into two groups—the low-flexion relaxation ratio (FRR) group and the normal-FRR group, depending on the FRR value. All participants performed a document task for 50 min using both types of monitors. It was found that the FRR values significantly decreased after the documentation task. The CVA analysis showed that the moving monitor’s frequency of forward head posture (FHP) was lower than that for the fixed monitor. Overall, the moving monitor worked better than the fixed monitor; this can be interpreted as proof that such monitors can reduce neck fatigue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7504159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75041592020-09-24 A Comparison Study of Posture and Fatigue of Neck According to Monitor Types (Moving and Fixed Monitor) by Using Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon (FRP) and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA) Choi, Kyeong-Hee Cho, Min-Uk Park, Chae-Won Kim, Seoung-Yeon Kim, Min-Jung Hong, Boram Kong, Yong-Ku Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This study quantified the neck posture and fatigue using the flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) and craniovertebral angle (CVA); further, it compared the difference between the level of fatigue and neck posture induced by two types of monitors (regular fixed monitor and moving monitor). Twenty-three male participants were classified into two groups—the low-flexion relaxation ratio (FRR) group and the normal-FRR group, depending on the FRR value. All participants performed a document task for 50 min using both types of monitors. It was found that the FRR values significantly decreased after the documentation task. The CVA analysis showed that the moving monitor’s frequency of forward head posture (FHP) was lower than that for the fixed monitor. Overall, the moving monitor worked better than the fixed monitor; this can be interpreted as proof that such monitors can reduce neck fatigue. MDPI 2020-08-31 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7504159/ /pubmed/32878184 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176345 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Choi, Kyeong-Hee
Cho, Min-Uk
Park, Chae-Won
Kim, Seoung-Yeon
Kim, Min-Jung
Hong, Boram
Kong, Yong-Ku
A Comparison Study of Posture and Fatigue of Neck According to Monitor Types (Moving and Fixed Monitor) by Using Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon (FRP) and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA)
title A Comparison Study of Posture and Fatigue of Neck According to Monitor Types (Moving and Fixed Monitor) by Using Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon (FRP) and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA)
title_full A Comparison Study of Posture and Fatigue of Neck According to Monitor Types (Moving and Fixed Monitor) by Using Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon (FRP) and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA)
title_fullStr A Comparison Study of Posture and Fatigue of Neck According to Monitor Types (Moving and Fixed Monitor) by Using Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon (FRP) and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA)
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison Study of Posture and Fatigue of Neck According to Monitor Types (Moving and Fixed Monitor) by Using Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon (FRP) and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA)
title_short A Comparison Study of Posture and Fatigue of Neck According to Monitor Types (Moving and Fixed Monitor) by Using Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon (FRP) and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA)
title_sort comparison study of posture and fatigue of neck according to monitor types (moving and fixed monitor) by using flexion relaxation phenomenon (frp) and craniovertebral angle (cva)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7504159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32878184
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176345
work_keys_str_mv AT choikyeonghee acomparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva
AT chominuk acomparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva
AT parkchaewon acomparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva
AT kimseoungyeon acomparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva
AT kimminjung acomparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva
AT hongboram acomparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva
AT kongyongku acomparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva
AT choikyeonghee comparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva
AT chominuk comparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva
AT parkchaewon comparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva
AT kimseoungyeon comparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva
AT kimminjung comparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva
AT hongboram comparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva
AT kongyongku comparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva