Cargando…
A Comparison Study of Posture and Fatigue of Neck According to Monitor Types (Moving and Fixed Monitor) by Using Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon (FRP) and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA)
This study quantified the neck posture and fatigue using the flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) and craniovertebral angle (CVA); further, it compared the difference between the level of fatigue and neck posture induced by two types of monitors (regular fixed monitor and moving monitor). Twenty-thre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7504159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32878184 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176345 |
_version_ | 1783584560274997248 |
---|---|
author | Choi, Kyeong-Hee Cho, Min-Uk Park, Chae-Won Kim, Seoung-Yeon Kim, Min-Jung Hong, Boram Kong, Yong-Ku |
author_facet | Choi, Kyeong-Hee Cho, Min-Uk Park, Chae-Won Kim, Seoung-Yeon Kim, Min-Jung Hong, Boram Kong, Yong-Ku |
author_sort | Choi, Kyeong-Hee |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study quantified the neck posture and fatigue using the flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) and craniovertebral angle (CVA); further, it compared the difference between the level of fatigue and neck posture induced by two types of monitors (regular fixed monitor and moving monitor). Twenty-three male participants were classified into two groups—the low-flexion relaxation ratio (FRR) group and the normal-FRR group, depending on the FRR value. All participants performed a document task for 50 min using both types of monitors. It was found that the FRR values significantly decreased after the documentation task. The CVA analysis showed that the moving monitor’s frequency of forward head posture (FHP) was lower than that for the fixed monitor. Overall, the moving monitor worked better than the fixed monitor; this can be interpreted as proof that such monitors can reduce neck fatigue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7504159 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75041592020-09-24 A Comparison Study of Posture and Fatigue of Neck According to Monitor Types (Moving and Fixed Monitor) by Using Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon (FRP) and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA) Choi, Kyeong-Hee Cho, Min-Uk Park, Chae-Won Kim, Seoung-Yeon Kim, Min-Jung Hong, Boram Kong, Yong-Ku Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This study quantified the neck posture and fatigue using the flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) and craniovertebral angle (CVA); further, it compared the difference between the level of fatigue and neck posture induced by two types of monitors (regular fixed monitor and moving monitor). Twenty-three male participants were classified into two groups—the low-flexion relaxation ratio (FRR) group and the normal-FRR group, depending on the FRR value. All participants performed a document task for 50 min using both types of monitors. It was found that the FRR values significantly decreased after the documentation task. The CVA analysis showed that the moving monitor’s frequency of forward head posture (FHP) was lower than that for the fixed monitor. Overall, the moving monitor worked better than the fixed monitor; this can be interpreted as proof that such monitors can reduce neck fatigue. MDPI 2020-08-31 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7504159/ /pubmed/32878184 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176345 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Choi, Kyeong-Hee Cho, Min-Uk Park, Chae-Won Kim, Seoung-Yeon Kim, Min-Jung Hong, Boram Kong, Yong-Ku A Comparison Study of Posture and Fatigue of Neck According to Monitor Types (Moving and Fixed Monitor) by Using Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon (FRP) and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA) |
title | A Comparison Study of Posture and Fatigue of Neck According to Monitor Types (Moving and Fixed Monitor) by Using Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon (FRP) and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA) |
title_full | A Comparison Study of Posture and Fatigue of Neck According to Monitor Types (Moving and Fixed Monitor) by Using Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon (FRP) and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA) |
title_fullStr | A Comparison Study of Posture and Fatigue of Neck According to Monitor Types (Moving and Fixed Monitor) by Using Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon (FRP) and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA) |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison Study of Posture and Fatigue of Neck According to Monitor Types (Moving and Fixed Monitor) by Using Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon (FRP) and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA) |
title_short | A Comparison Study of Posture and Fatigue of Neck According to Monitor Types (Moving and Fixed Monitor) by Using Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon (FRP) and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA) |
title_sort | comparison study of posture and fatigue of neck according to monitor types (moving and fixed monitor) by using flexion relaxation phenomenon (frp) and craniovertebral angle (cva) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7504159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32878184 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176345 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choikyeonghee acomparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva AT chominuk acomparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva AT parkchaewon acomparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva AT kimseoungyeon acomparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva AT kimminjung acomparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva AT hongboram acomparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva AT kongyongku acomparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva AT choikyeonghee comparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva AT chominuk comparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva AT parkchaewon comparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva AT kimseoungyeon comparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva AT kimminjung comparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva AT hongboram comparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva AT kongyongku comparisonstudyofpostureandfatigueofneckaccordingtomonitortypesmovingandfixedmonitorbyusingflexionrelaxationphenomenonfrpandcraniovertebralanglecva |