Cargando…

Frailty Status and Transport Disadvantage: Comparison of Older Adults’ Travel Behaviours between Metropolitan, Suburban, and Rural Areas of Japan

This study examined differences in older adults’ travel behaviours by frailty status in metropolitan, suburban, and rural areas of Japan. Data were collected from 9104 older adults (73.5 ± 5.7 years; 51% women; 19% frail) living in metropolitan (n = 5032), suburban (n = 2853), and rural areas (n = 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abe, Takumi, Kitamura, Akihiko, Seino, Satoshi, Yokoyama, Yuri, Amano, Hidenori, Taniguchi, Yu, Nishi, Mariko, Nofuji, Yu, Ikeuchi, Tomoko, Sugiyama, Takemi, Shinkai, Shoji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7504364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32882994
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176367
_version_ 1783584607658049536
author Abe, Takumi
Kitamura, Akihiko
Seino, Satoshi
Yokoyama, Yuri
Amano, Hidenori
Taniguchi, Yu
Nishi, Mariko
Nofuji, Yu
Ikeuchi, Tomoko
Sugiyama, Takemi
Shinkai, Shoji
author_facet Abe, Takumi
Kitamura, Akihiko
Seino, Satoshi
Yokoyama, Yuri
Amano, Hidenori
Taniguchi, Yu
Nishi, Mariko
Nofuji, Yu
Ikeuchi, Tomoko
Sugiyama, Takemi
Shinkai, Shoji
author_sort Abe, Takumi
collection PubMed
description This study examined differences in older adults’ travel behaviours by frailty status in metropolitan, suburban, and rural areas of Japan. Data were collected from 9104 older adults (73.5 ± 5.7 years; 51% women; 19% frail) living in metropolitan (n = 5032), suburban (n = 2853), and rural areas (n = 1219) of Japan. Participants reported if they walked, cycled, drove a car, rode a car as a passenger, and used public transportation (PT) once per week or more. A standardised questionnaire was used to assess frailty status. We conducted logistic regression analysis to calculate the odds ratios of using each travel mode by frailty status stratified by locality. Relative to non-frail participants, frail participants were less likely to walk and drive a car in all three areas. Frail participants had significantly higher odds of being a car passenger in the suburban (OR = 1.73 (95% CI: 1.32, 2.25)) and rural areas (OR = 1.61 (1.10, 2.35)) but not in the metropolitan area (OR = 1.08 (0.87, 1.33)). This study found that frail older adults living in suburban and rural areas tended to rely more on cars driven by someone else, suggesting that transport disadvantage is more pronounced in suburban and rural areas than in metropolitan areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7504364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75043642020-09-24 Frailty Status and Transport Disadvantage: Comparison of Older Adults’ Travel Behaviours between Metropolitan, Suburban, and Rural Areas of Japan Abe, Takumi Kitamura, Akihiko Seino, Satoshi Yokoyama, Yuri Amano, Hidenori Taniguchi, Yu Nishi, Mariko Nofuji, Yu Ikeuchi, Tomoko Sugiyama, Takemi Shinkai, Shoji Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This study examined differences in older adults’ travel behaviours by frailty status in metropolitan, suburban, and rural areas of Japan. Data were collected from 9104 older adults (73.5 ± 5.7 years; 51% women; 19% frail) living in metropolitan (n = 5032), suburban (n = 2853), and rural areas (n = 1219) of Japan. Participants reported if they walked, cycled, drove a car, rode a car as a passenger, and used public transportation (PT) once per week or more. A standardised questionnaire was used to assess frailty status. We conducted logistic regression analysis to calculate the odds ratios of using each travel mode by frailty status stratified by locality. Relative to non-frail participants, frail participants were less likely to walk and drive a car in all three areas. Frail participants had significantly higher odds of being a car passenger in the suburban (OR = 1.73 (95% CI: 1.32, 2.25)) and rural areas (OR = 1.61 (1.10, 2.35)) but not in the metropolitan area (OR = 1.08 (0.87, 1.33)). This study found that frail older adults living in suburban and rural areas tended to rely more on cars driven by someone else, suggesting that transport disadvantage is more pronounced in suburban and rural areas than in metropolitan areas. MDPI 2020-09-01 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7504364/ /pubmed/32882994 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176367 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Abe, Takumi
Kitamura, Akihiko
Seino, Satoshi
Yokoyama, Yuri
Amano, Hidenori
Taniguchi, Yu
Nishi, Mariko
Nofuji, Yu
Ikeuchi, Tomoko
Sugiyama, Takemi
Shinkai, Shoji
Frailty Status and Transport Disadvantage: Comparison of Older Adults’ Travel Behaviours between Metropolitan, Suburban, and Rural Areas of Japan
title Frailty Status and Transport Disadvantage: Comparison of Older Adults’ Travel Behaviours between Metropolitan, Suburban, and Rural Areas of Japan
title_full Frailty Status and Transport Disadvantage: Comparison of Older Adults’ Travel Behaviours between Metropolitan, Suburban, and Rural Areas of Japan
title_fullStr Frailty Status and Transport Disadvantage: Comparison of Older Adults’ Travel Behaviours between Metropolitan, Suburban, and Rural Areas of Japan
title_full_unstemmed Frailty Status and Transport Disadvantage: Comparison of Older Adults’ Travel Behaviours between Metropolitan, Suburban, and Rural Areas of Japan
title_short Frailty Status and Transport Disadvantage: Comparison of Older Adults’ Travel Behaviours between Metropolitan, Suburban, and Rural Areas of Japan
title_sort frailty status and transport disadvantage: comparison of older adults’ travel behaviours between metropolitan, suburban, and rural areas of japan
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7504364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32882994
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176367
work_keys_str_mv AT abetakumi frailtystatusandtransportdisadvantagecomparisonofolderadultstravelbehavioursbetweenmetropolitansuburbanandruralareasofjapan
AT kitamuraakihiko frailtystatusandtransportdisadvantagecomparisonofolderadultstravelbehavioursbetweenmetropolitansuburbanandruralareasofjapan
AT seinosatoshi frailtystatusandtransportdisadvantagecomparisonofolderadultstravelbehavioursbetweenmetropolitansuburbanandruralareasofjapan
AT yokoyamayuri frailtystatusandtransportdisadvantagecomparisonofolderadultstravelbehavioursbetweenmetropolitansuburbanandruralareasofjapan
AT amanohidenori frailtystatusandtransportdisadvantagecomparisonofolderadultstravelbehavioursbetweenmetropolitansuburbanandruralareasofjapan
AT taniguchiyu frailtystatusandtransportdisadvantagecomparisonofolderadultstravelbehavioursbetweenmetropolitansuburbanandruralareasofjapan
AT nishimariko frailtystatusandtransportdisadvantagecomparisonofolderadultstravelbehavioursbetweenmetropolitansuburbanandruralareasofjapan
AT nofujiyu frailtystatusandtransportdisadvantagecomparisonofolderadultstravelbehavioursbetweenmetropolitansuburbanandruralareasofjapan
AT ikeuchitomoko frailtystatusandtransportdisadvantagecomparisonofolderadultstravelbehavioursbetweenmetropolitansuburbanandruralareasofjapan
AT sugiyamatakemi frailtystatusandtransportdisadvantagecomparisonofolderadultstravelbehavioursbetweenmetropolitansuburbanandruralareasofjapan
AT shinkaishoji frailtystatusandtransportdisadvantagecomparisonofolderadultstravelbehavioursbetweenmetropolitansuburbanandruralareasofjapan