Cargando…

Comparison of Ammonia Emission Estimation between Passive Sampler and Chamber System in Paddy Soil after Fertilizer Application

Ammonia (NH(3)) is an important precursor for particulate secondary aerosol formation. This study was conducted to evaluate the applicability of a passive sampler (PAS) for estimating the NH(3) emission from chemical fertilizer application (85 kg-N·ha(−1)) at field scale and to compare the results w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Min-Suk, Koo, Namin, Hyun, Seunghun, Kim, Jeong-Gyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7504389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32887283
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176387
_version_ 1783584613570969600
author Kim, Min-Suk
Koo, Namin
Hyun, Seunghun
Kim, Jeong-Gyu
author_facet Kim, Min-Suk
Koo, Namin
Hyun, Seunghun
Kim, Jeong-Gyu
author_sort Kim, Min-Suk
collection PubMed
description Ammonia (NH(3)) is an important precursor for particulate secondary aerosol formation. This study was conducted to evaluate the applicability of a passive sampler (PAS) for estimating the NH(3) emission from chemical fertilizer application (85 kg-N·ha(−1)) at field scale and to compare the results with a chamber system for the calculation of NH(3) emission flux at lab scale. The application of chemical fertilizer increased the ambient NH(3) concentration from 7.11 to 16.87 μg·m(−3). Also, the ambient NH(3) concentration measured by the PAS was found to be highly influenced by not only the chemical fertilizer application but also the weather (temperature and rainfall). Wind rose diagram data can be useful for understanding the distribution of ambient NH(3) concentration. In the case of a chamber with few environmental variables, NH(3) was emitted very quickly in the early stages and gradually decreased, whereas it was delayed at intervals of about one week at the site. It was found that daily temperature range, atmospheric disturbance by wind and rainfall, changes in soil moisture, and the presence of a flooded water table were the main influencing factors. The PAS data and the chamber system data were observed to have significant differences in spatial-temporal scale. In order to reduce the gap, it seems to be necessary to further develop a chamber system, in order to improve the precision of field analysis and to strengthen the connection between experimental results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7504389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75043892020-09-24 Comparison of Ammonia Emission Estimation between Passive Sampler and Chamber System in Paddy Soil after Fertilizer Application Kim, Min-Suk Koo, Namin Hyun, Seunghun Kim, Jeong-Gyu Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Ammonia (NH(3)) is an important precursor for particulate secondary aerosol formation. This study was conducted to evaluate the applicability of a passive sampler (PAS) for estimating the NH(3) emission from chemical fertilizer application (85 kg-N·ha(−1)) at field scale and to compare the results with a chamber system for the calculation of NH(3) emission flux at lab scale. The application of chemical fertilizer increased the ambient NH(3) concentration from 7.11 to 16.87 μg·m(−3). Also, the ambient NH(3) concentration measured by the PAS was found to be highly influenced by not only the chemical fertilizer application but also the weather (temperature and rainfall). Wind rose diagram data can be useful for understanding the distribution of ambient NH(3) concentration. In the case of a chamber with few environmental variables, NH(3) was emitted very quickly in the early stages and gradually decreased, whereas it was delayed at intervals of about one week at the site. It was found that daily temperature range, atmospheric disturbance by wind and rainfall, changes in soil moisture, and the presence of a flooded water table were the main influencing factors. The PAS data and the chamber system data were observed to have significant differences in spatial-temporal scale. In order to reduce the gap, it seems to be necessary to further develop a chamber system, in order to improve the precision of field analysis and to strengthen the connection between experimental results. MDPI 2020-09-02 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7504389/ /pubmed/32887283 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176387 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Min-Suk
Koo, Namin
Hyun, Seunghun
Kim, Jeong-Gyu
Comparison of Ammonia Emission Estimation between Passive Sampler and Chamber System in Paddy Soil after Fertilizer Application
title Comparison of Ammonia Emission Estimation between Passive Sampler and Chamber System in Paddy Soil after Fertilizer Application
title_full Comparison of Ammonia Emission Estimation between Passive Sampler and Chamber System in Paddy Soil after Fertilizer Application
title_fullStr Comparison of Ammonia Emission Estimation between Passive Sampler and Chamber System in Paddy Soil after Fertilizer Application
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Ammonia Emission Estimation between Passive Sampler and Chamber System in Paddy Soil after Fertilizer Application
title_short Comparison of Ammonia Emission Estimation between Passive Sampler and Chamber System in Paddy Soil after Fertilizer Application
title_sort comparison of ammonia emission estimation between passive sampler and chamber system in paddy soil after fertilizer application
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7504389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32887283
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176387
work_keys_str_mv AT kimminsuk comparisonofammoniaemissionestimationbetweenpassivesamplerandchambersysteminpaddysoilafterfertilizerapplication
AT koonamin comparisonofammoniaemissionestimationbetweenpassivesamplerandchambersysteminpaddysoilafterfertilizerapplication
AT hyunseunghun comparisonofammoniaemissionestimationbetweenpassivesamplerandchambersysteminpaddysoilafterfertilizerapplication
AT kimjeonggyu comparisonofammoniaemissionestimationbetweenpassivesamplerandchambersysteminpaddysoilafterfertilizerapplication